Re: [patch] config.sub recognize m68k-next-openstep as openstep not nextstep3
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:11:08PM +0100, Urs Janßen wrote: > ChangeLog: > 2019-03-28 Urs Janßen >* config.sub recognize m68k-next-openstep* as openstep*, not nextstep3 It would be cool if you had updated the testsuite, given that you had already developed the test cases. Patch applied. Ben signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
[patch] config.sub recognize m68k-next-openstep as openstep not nextstep3
Before the patch: ./config.sub.o m68k-next-openstep4 m68k-next-nextstep3 # <- this is wrong ./config.sub.o i386-next-openstep4 i386-next-openstep4 ./config.sub.o m68k-next-nextstep3 m68k-next-nextstep3 After the patch: ./config.sub m68k-next-openstep4 m68k-next-openstep4 ./config.sub i386-next-openstep4 i386-next-openstep4 ./config.sub m68k-next-nextstep3 m68k-next-nextstep3 Comment: I belive that *-next-openstep* is limited to *-next-openstep4 (config.guess emmit 1 digit version number and starting with version 5 the os was renamed to rhapsody) but I didn't "hardcode" that in the patch. ChangeLog: 2019-03-28 Urs Janßen * config.sub recognize m68k-next-openstep* as openstep*, not nextstep3 --- config.sub.o 2019-03-28 21:52:46.476144364 +0100 +++ config.sub 2019-03-28 21:55:53.506810964 +0100 @@ -822,7 +822,9 @@ cpu=m68k vendor=next case $os in - nextstep* ) + openstep*) + ;; + nextstep*) ;; ns2*) os=nextstep2 ___ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
Re: lcm 1.1.2 install on NVIDIA Jetson TX2
Hi Ben, You are cirrect. The vendor original name was "aarch64". I have changed the uname to ARM to enable remote debugging from visual studio with Jetson tx2. after reverting to original uname, the installation is successful. Thanks Boris בתאריך יום ד׳, 27 במרץ 2019, 22:14, מאת Ben Elliston : > Hi Boris > > Thanks for your report. > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:01:26PM +, Boris Borukhin wrote: > > > uname -m = ARM > > uname -r = 4.4.38-tegra > > uname -s = Linux > > uname -v = #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 6 07:57:23 CDT 2018 > > Why does this Linux kernel report "ARM" in upper case instead of lower > case, like everyone else? What a pain. I wish vendors wouldn't make > unnecessary changes like this. > > Before we make the obvious change to recognise "ARM", can you please > try and establish why this is so? Are you sure you're not running a > patched kernel, or running an unintended version of unane? Perhaps > check with "which uname"? > > Thanks, > Ben > ___ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
Re: lcm 1.1.2 install on NVIDIA Jetson TX2
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 08:13:52AM +0200, Boris Borukhin wrote: > after reverting to original uname, the installation is successful. Phew, I am glad. :) Cheers, Ben signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
