Re: audit of Windows triplets

[Earnie]

On 9/11/2017 9:54 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I committed the following:
> 
> * config.sub (maybe_os): Remove -windowsnt*.
> * config.guess (Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*): Remove obsolete case.
> (21064:Windows_NT:50:3): Likewise.
> (i*:windows32*:*): Likewise.
> ([345]86:Windows_95:*, [345]86:Windows_98:*): Likewise.
> ([345]86:Windows_NT:*): Likewise.
> (8664:Windows_NT:*): Likewise.
> (i*:Windows_NT*:* | Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*): Likewise.
> (p*:CYGWIN*:*): Likewise.
> * testsuite/config-guess.data: Remove relevant test cases.
> 

Now we wait to see who complains.

-- 
Earnie

___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches

Re: audit of Windows triplets

[Ben Elliston]

I committed the following:

* config.sub (maybe_os): Remove -windowsnt*.
* config.guess (Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*): Remove obsolete case.
(21064:Windows_NT:50:3): Likewise.
(i*:windows32*:*): Likewise.
([345]86:Windows_95:*, [345]86:Windows_98:*): Likewise.
([345]86:Windows_NT:*): Likewise.
(8664:Windows_NT:*): Likewise.
(i*:Windows_NT*:* | Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*): Likewise.
(p*:CYGWIN*:*): Likewise.
* testsuite/config-guess.data: Remove relevant test cases.

Cheers,
Ben


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches

Re: audit of Windows triplets

[Ben Elliston]

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:36:13AM -0400, Earnie wrote:

> > I am thinking of removing the following cases:
> > 
> >Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
> >21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
> >[345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
> >i*:windows32*:*)
> >i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
> >p*:CYGWIN*:*)(matched PPC)
> >*:Interix*:*)
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> As far as MinGW is concerned I have no problems with removing these.
> You didn't list 8664:Windows_NT:*), I'm okay with that one too.

Thanks. I'm not normally inclined to remove triplets (because I find
it a useful way to preserve the history!) but in this case, it's too
confusing for all of these defunct attempts to do Unix on Windows.

Cheers,
Ben


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches

Re: audit of Windows triplets

[Earnie]

On 9/11/2017 12:45 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I wanted to ask if there are any of these cases that can be sensibly
> be removed from config.guess to simplify the Windows
> situation. Currently, we have:
> 
>Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
>21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
>i*:CYGWIN*:*)
>*:MINGW64*:*)
>*:MINGW*:*)
>i*:windows32*:*)
>*:Interix*:*)
>[345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
>8664:Windows_NT:*)
>i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
>i*:UWIN*:*)
>amd64:CYGWIN*:*:*|x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*)
>p*:CYGWIN*:*)
> 
> I am thinking of removing the following cases:
> 
>Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
>21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
>[345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
>i*:windows32*:*)
>i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
>p*:CYGWIN*:*)  (matched PPC)
>*:Interix*:*)
> 
> Thoughts?

As far as MinGW is concerned I have no problems with removing these.

You didn't list 8664:Windows_NT:*), I'm okay with that one too.

-- 
Earnie

___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches

audit of Windows triplets

[Ben Elliston]

Hi all

I wanted to ask if there are any of these cases that can be sensibly
be removed from config.guess to simplify the Windows
situation. Currently, we have:

   Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
   21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
   i*:CYGWIN*:*)
   *:MINGW64*:*)
   *:MINGW*:*)
   i*:windows32*:*)
   *:Interix*:*)
   [345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
   8664:Windows_NT:*)
   i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
   i*:UWIN*:*)
   amd64:CYGWIN*:*:*|x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*)
   p*:CYGWIN*:*)

I am thinking of removing the following cases:

   Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
   21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
   [345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
   i*:windows32*:*)
   i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
   p*:CYGWIN*:*)(matched PPC)
   *:Interix*:*)

Thoughts?

Cheers, Ben


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches