connor horman writes:
> It seems to me reading this thread that we've come into two
> conflicting realities: * There exists targets that need to be
> distinguished, and * They are not distinct in any component that
> config.sub has, therefore they cannot and should not be distinguished.
>
>
On 8/24/23 23:54, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
John Ericson wrote:
This is why I opened with "Operating System" lacks a coherent
objective definition.
[...]
As I understand, historically, "operating systems" were proprietary
monoliths and the GNU Project originally expected to produce another
Thanks Connor. I think we are both on the same page!
On 8/24/23 14:51, connor horman wrote:
It seems to me reading this thread that we've come into two
conflicting realities:
* There exists targets that need to be distinguished, and
* They are not distinct in any component that config.sub
John Ericson wrote:
On 8/24/23 23:54, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
John Ericson wrote:
This is why I opened with "Operating System" lacks a coherent
objective definition.
[...]
As I understand, historically, "operating systems" were proprietary
monoliths and the GNU Project originally
