Re: [Conkeror] no more -no-remote?
> > Thank you Axel. Is there currently a way to create two independent > > instances of conkeror? > > > > I've found the profile manager rather inconvenient and have instead relied > on setting up an alternate directory structure for conkeror with symlinks > back to all of the original files, except for application.ini which is > modified to use a different Name in place of conkeror. Thank you. I will try to set this up. Best wishes, Silvio ___ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
Re: [Conkeror] no more -no-remote?
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Silvio Levy wrote: > > > I think that's something that changed in Firefox/XULRunner. There are > > at least two bug reports in Debian about -no-remote having changed in > > its meaning: > > Thank you Axel. Is there currently a way to create two independent > instances of conkeror? > I've found the profile manager rather inconvenient and have instead relied on setting up an alternate directory structure for conkeror with symlinks back to all of the original files, except for application.ini which is modified to use a different Name in place of conkeror. ___ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
Re: [Conkeror] no more -no-remote?
> I think that's something that changed in Firefox/XULRunner. There are > at least two bug reports in Debian about -no-remote having changed in > its meaning: Thank you Axel. Is there currently a way to create two independent instances of conkeror? Silvio ___ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
Re: [Conkeror] no more -no-remote?
Hi, On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Silvio Levy wrote: > I would like to create a separate instance of conkeror for certain > memory-hogging pages, so I can kill it easily when necessary. But > whenever I type "conkeror -no-remote" I get the message > > "conkeror is already running, but is not responding. To open a new > window, you must first close the existing conkeror process, or restart > your system." I think that's something that changed in Firefox/XULRunner. There are at least two bug reports in Debian about -no-remote having changed in its meaning: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666716 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675544 I suspect that the same counts for Conkeror with XULRunner 10 and higher. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News| [email protected] (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | [email protected] (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web) ___ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
