Janice Rogers Brown

2003-09-19 Thread Matthew J. Franck
In today's Washington Post, Douglas T. Kendall and Timothy J. Dowling have an op-ed in which they describe California supreme court justice Janice Rogers Brown, now a nominee to the D.C. Circuit, as openly support[ing] a return to the era of Lochner. There are some interesting Brown quotations

Re: Janice Rogers Brown

2003-09-19 Thread Keith E. Whittington
There are similar sounding things (though not those exact quotes) reported in the People for the American Way's brief against Brown's confirmation, which cites unpublished speeches she gave to various organizations and which were on file with the Senate Judiciary Committee. The PAW report

law profs can't count?

2003-09-19 Thread Charles Fried
In my forthcoming book on constitutional law (Saying What The Law Is: The Constitution in the Supreme Court) which is now approaching page proofs I make assertions about a) the number of words in the Constitution, and b) the number of justices who have sat on the Court since its beginning. I did a

Re: En Banc Review

2003-09-19 Thread Michael Zimmer
Now that the Ninth Circuit has announced it will hear the case en banc, with oral arguments, I have a question: Do any other circuits have an en banc procedure using a panel system rather than the whole court? If they do, does that mean there is a tendency to grant more en banc petitions (on the

Re: CA9 takes case in banc

2003-09-19 Thread Samuel Issacharoff
I notice the order says that the decision is not to be cited as precedent to not only the Ninth Circuit, but any district court in the Ninth Circuit. Under Ninth Circuit procedure, does this include not being cited to the district court that refused to stay the election? If so, is this the

Re: En Banc Review

2003-09-19 Thread Edward A Hartnett
28 USC 46(c) provides that an in banc court consists of all circuit judges in regular active service, but has an exception for circuit that have more than 15 active judges, which can, by local rule, have smaller in banc panels. See Public Law 95-486. The only court of appeals, other than the 9th

Re: CA9 takes case in banc

2003-09-19 Thread Scarberry, Mark
No, I don't think so, because the mandate has not issued (or effectively was recalled). In the absence of issuance of the mandate, the panel's opinion has no effect on the parties, I think. Per Judge Thomas's order of Sept. 16, the mandate is not to issue except on further order of the court (as I

Re: CA9 takes case in banc

2003-09-19 Thread Gregg Miller
The comment to the circuit rules indicates that the ban on citation applies to all en banc review. -Original Message- From: Scarberry, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CA9 takes case in banc No, I don't think so,

Re: (no subject)

2003-09-19 Thread Gary Allison
Have them read The Founding Brothers by Joeseph Ellis. Gary Allison At 06:05 PM 9/18/2003 EDT, you wrote: Thanks very much. Bobby Lipkin Widener University School of Law Delaware -- Gary D. Allison Professor of Law University of Tulsa College of Law 3120 E. 4th Place Tulsa, Ok