SSP: I recently canvassed the historical proposals for supermajority rule
as a means of enforcing judicial restraint in Thayerian Deference
to Congress and Supreme Court Supermajority Rule: Lessons from the
Past, 78 Indiana L J 73 (2003). Best, Evan
At 03:05 PM 7/27/2003, Rick Duncan wrote:
My
]
- Original Message -
From: Marci Hamilton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/26/2003 3:53:52 PM
Subject: Re: Inquiry
In a message dated 7/25/2003 7:58:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A proposed amendment to the Constitution is ratified after a majority of the electorate in two
Hello:
Recently, I was asked a question that I thought some on this list might
find interesting. If you were given the power to add a single amendment to
the U.S. Constitution, what would it be and why? Responses can be sent
directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
Bob
Dear Bob:
My choice would be this: A proposed amendment to the Constitution is ratified after a majority of the electorate in two consecutive presidential elections vote for it.
Best,
Bobby
Bobby Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
