Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread Zietlow, Rebecca E.
of Toledo College of Law (419) 530-2872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Eastman, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 5:56 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference My point

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread David M Wagner
r 15, 2003 10:03 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference I have been asked to speak about this case on the local media (as I am sure many of you also have been), and I am curious what you experts expect the outcome o

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread Sam Bagenstos
- From: Discussion list for con law professors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Zietlow, Rebecca E. Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference I have been asked to speak about this case on the local

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread Zietlow, Rebecca E.
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zietlow, Rebecca E.Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:03 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference I have been asked to speak about this case on the local media (as I am sure many of you

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread Zietlow, Rebecca E.
ober 15, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference I have been asked to speak about this case on the local media (as I am sure many of you also have been), and I am curious what you exper

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-14 Thread Mark Graber
Be curious to see the difference in attitudes about whether a) a pledge that has been recited by generations of school children is unconstitutional and b) a pledge that has been recited since the 1950s is unconstitutional (two generations by my count). MAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/14/03

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-14 Thread Steve Wermiel
Amendment. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case on behalf of the United States. -Original Message- From: Bill Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Oct 14, 2003 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference Even

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-14 Thread Eastman, John
the Fourteenth Amendment. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case on behalf of the United States. -Original Message- From: Bill Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Oct 14, 2003 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-14 Thread Marty Lederman
ctober 14, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference Also significant, I think, is that the Supreme Court DENIED the cert petition from the United States (and also the petition that had been filed by Newdow himself), although it did invite the Solicito

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-14 Thread Eastman, John
- Original Message - From: "Eastman, John" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference Also significant, I think, is that the Supreme Court DENIED the