Re: recusal (unintended consequences)

2003-10-29 Thread Sanford Levinson
I have no idea why Justice Scalia recused himself. (And, as you know, I remain unpersuaded that he was in fact under a duty to do so.) But let's assume that there is evidence that he did it in order to create the win-win situation that Richard Duncan initially hypothesized. I.e., A 4-4 affirmance

Re: recusal (unintended consequences)

2003-10-29 Thread Ilya Somin
It's certainly possible that there's a problem of this kind with the theory. I don't actually believe that the theory explains Scalia's decision. However, it's possible that 4 justices care enough about affirming the 9th Cir. decision that they're willing to risk the adverse political

Re: recusal (unintended consequences)

2003-10-29 Thread Ilya Somin
I just want to take this opportunity to become the first person (or at least the first person known to Sanford Levinson) to express the hope that the Supreme Court does affirm the 9th Circuit, even though I agree that it's unlikely they will do so. I too believe the 9th Cir. was right on the