Done, and thanks!
Karl
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Sami Siren wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Since no distinction is made
>> between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
>> many of the original committers/IPMC members have become in
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Since no distinction is made
> between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
> many of the original committers/IPMC members have become inactive, and
> others have not yet been voted in as PPMC members, how should we dea
Looks like we missed a step; we need a graduation resolution for the
board to vote on. Here's my proposal, basically copied from Apache
Chemistry's, but I have a question. Since no distinction is made
between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
many of the original commit
I've opened the vote in the general@i.a.o list.
Karl
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Six binding +1's. No -1's or abstentions. >72 hours. Vote passes!
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alex Ott wrote:
>> +1, although I'm not developer...
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24,
