On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 06:28 -0700, Naveen Singh wrote:
> > > I didn't notice sin_port being used anywhere, so this is not needed?
> > >
> > This is being used in current code so I decided to follow the current
Hi Patrik,
Sorry for a very delayed reply on this thread. I do appreciate all your
feedback and I would send you the revised patch on Monday after testing it
for both IPv4 and IPv6 timeserver and all possible combinations.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Patrik Flykt
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 23:50 -0700, Naveen Singh wrote:
> From: Naveen Singh
>
> Current NTP code is written with an assumption that timeserver is
> always an IPv4 address. If there is an IPv6 timeserver then the socket
> operation would fail with error as
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Naveen Singh
wrote:
> From: Naveen Singh
>
> Current NTP code is written with an assumption that timeserver is
> always an IPv4 address. If there is an IPv6 timeserver then the socket
> operation would fail with