Re: [PATCH v3] IPv6 timeserver for NTP

2015-10-28 Thread Naveen Singh
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Patrik Flykt wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 06:28 -0700, Naveen Singh wrote: > > > I didn't notice sin_port being used anywhere, so this is not needed? > > > > > This is being used in current code so I decided to follow the current

Re: [PATCH v3] IPv6 timeserver for NTP

2015-10-23 Thread Naveen Singh
Hi Patrik, Sorry for a very delayed reply on this thread. I do appreciate all your feedback and I would send you the revised patch on Monday after testing it for both IPv4 and IPv6 timeserver and all possible combinations. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Patrik Flykt

Re: [PATCH v3] IPv6 timeserver for NTP

2015-10-08 Thread Patrik Flykt
Hi, On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 23:50 -0700, Naveen Singh wrote: > From: Naveen Singh > > Current NTP code is written with an assumption that timeserver is > always an IPv4 address. If there is an IPv6 timeserver then the socket > operation would fail with error as

Re: [PATCH v3] IPv6 timeserver for NTP

2015-10-07 Thread Naveen Singh
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Naveen Singh wrote: > From: Naveen Singh > > Current NTP code is written with an assumption that timeserver is > always an IPv4 address. If there is an IPv6 timeserver then the socket > operation would fail with