Despite being the one to implement this, I had already forgotten that
the relevant specifier was w rather than A. I have now added a mention
of this to the discussion of WITH in the manual.
Daniel
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 7:37 AM Paul Meurer wrote:
>
> I think I found out of this; the correct way
I think I found out of this; the correct way seems to be to use the w flag:
WITH N - Hum - Pl
IF (1**w V + S:NonHum3Sg - S:Ad BARRIER Comma LINK NONE c >NSUBJ)
(NOT p (*)) {
MAP >NSUBJ (*) ;
SETPARENT (*) TO (jC1 (*)) ;
} ;
The hint to use ‘w’ is a bit hidden in the docs.
- Paul
On
