Re: [Container-tools] sshfs progress - try it out

Hi, > I guess Lala is referring to this: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/2016-February/msg00172.html Ahh, thanks. I missed that. --Hardy pgpj_Jueze2sM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Container-tools mailing list

Re: [Container-tools] Prepackaged OpenShift template with CDK

Hi, > > On Wed, 10-Feb-2016 13:33, Pete Muir wrote: > > > 1) eap64-mysql-persistent-s2i > > > > Did you mean to only include the EAP + MYSQL template. Right now, > > the plain EAP template (no database) is gone which seems wrong to me. Is > > it? > > > > I just saw eap64-basic-s2i in the

Re: [Container-tools] Prepackaged OpenShift template with CDK

Hi, Sorry to come back to this so late, but I tested the latest CDK build and noticed several changes to the available templates, so I wanted to bring this up again. On Wed, 10-Feb-2016 13:33, Pete Muir wrote: > 1) eap64-mysql-persistent-s2i Did you mean to only include the EAP + MYSQL

Re: [Container-tools] sshfs progress - try it out

Hi, Here is an update from my attempts to get the sshfs to work on Windows. > I am curious how this would work on Windows. Not quite sure how to start sshd > yet. > We are trying to avoid cygwin in favour of mingw. Not sure whether it > includes a sshd. > I try to do some research. If anyone

Re: [Container-tools] New and improved vagrant-sshfs

Hi, > So I've been told that asking users to forward an ssh-agent or provide > a password to get synced folders working isn't good enough :( > > Fair enough. I've done some research and found out how we can achieve > the mount without any of that (see [1]). Nice > I have some code ready and

Re: [Container-tools] [Devtools] openshift is way too permissive in the CDK/ADB

Hi, On Wed, 18-May-2016 07:10, Clayton Coleman wrote: > It was a deliberate choice, predicated on other changes coming to > Docker (user namespaces) plus the desire to ensure demos run. > > Ultimately, the CDK is a playground. Putting up chain link fences > around the playground sends the wrong

Re: [Container-tools] Atomic Developer Bundle videos available in Youtube

Hi, I had a quick look at the videos and imo they are too long. I think the maximum is 10 minutes with a sweet spot around 5 to 7 minutes. Instead of a 30 minutes all in one, I'd suggest to do short dedicated vidoes - Start CDK - Configure TLD - Connect to Docker - Build application - etc

[Container-tools] Minishift 1.0.0-beta.3

Hi, We are happy to announce the next Minishift release - Minishift 1.0.0-beta.3 [1]. The two main highlights of this version are, that we are now aligning with OpenShift Origin 1.4.1 [2] and that we overhauled the persistent configuration options [3]. We also made sure to finally document

[Container-tools] Minishift 1.0.0-beta.4 is out

Hi, The train towards Minishift 1.0.0 is running full steam ahead. Today we are happy to announce Minishift 1.0.0-beta.4 [1]. In total we have squashed 38 issues and you can view all the gory details on the GitHub milestone for this release [2]. For now we would like to highlight two specific

[Container-tools] Minishift 1.0.0-beta.2 release

Hi, We are happy to announce the second Minishift beta release - Minishift 1.0.0-beta.2 [1]. While the previous release focused on the initial switch to ‘oc cluster up’ for provisioning, we worked hard in this beta.2 release fixing some of the issues this switch introduced. Most

Re: [Container-tools] new minishift CDK

Hi, > > We had a situation where a route was misbehaving. My investigation > > strategy is to get inside the VM, oc get services and curl the IP address. We are providing oc on the host, so you can skip the step of logging into the VM. You can execute 'oc get service' on the host. Even better,

Re: [Container-tools] CDK issue with different home_directory

Hi, > > I was not aware that you could specify a different directory. That must be > > a new feature of RC2? No, that has been there all the time. > This we did for our integration test purpose to run it in a CI env. This is not only for integration testing. It works actually quite well. So,

[Container-tools] Minishift 1.0.0

The Minishift team is happy to announce Minishift 1.0.0 [1]. Thank you, everyone, who made this release possible, either through coding, testing, documenting, reporting issues or requesting a new feature. We welcome all contributions. Minishift 1.0.0 is a big milestone for us, since it

Re: [Container-tools] profiles

Hi, > > > so our docs are horrible > > Are we talking about upstream minishift docs here? I don't believe "minishift > profile" is in the latest CDK. Yes, Minishift aka upstream. Profiles are not in the CDK yet. I created https://github.com/minishift/minishift/issues/1485 to improve the

Re: [Container-tools] profiles

On Tue, 03-Oct-2017 14:28, Burr Sutter wrote: > any thoughts how the workaround for addons + profiles? See the comments on the issue you created. You are using the commands wrong. You issue 'config set' and 'addon enable' commands against the currently active profile, but then you start a new