Le Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Drup wrote:
> Shouldn't we just standardize on bunzli's libraries (including the new
> https://github.com/dbuenzli/utext) instead of trying to re-write code that
> usually ends up being quite subtle in each standard library ?
We could build on uutf, it's relatively small and
Le Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Drup wrote:
> Why not call this "Bijection" or "BijMap" ? BiMap simply implies two maps.
> This a bit more specific.
It makes sense! `Bijection` is about the intent, `BiMap` ties to an
implementation. However if we change the name we still have to convey
that it's a
Why not call this "Bijection" or "BijMap" ? BiMap simply implies two
maps. This a bit more specific.
Le 23/02/2018 à 01:37, SP a écrit :
I've started working on a BiMap, a map where (key, value) is also
(value, key) in a one-to-one relationship.