Re: svn commit: r635719 - in /continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-api/ continuum-commons/ continuum-configuration/ continuum-core/ continuum-data-management/ continuum-data-management/continuum-legacy/ cont

2008-03-10 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/03/2008, at 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - value${JAVA_HOME}/value + value${java.homr}/value java.home? - value${M2_HOME}/value + value${m2.home}/value maven.home? :) - Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL

Re: Trouble building maven-plugins parent pom in Continuum

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
: 591694) in column NAME that has maximum length of 255. Please correct your data! The full stack trace from the logs is here: http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Continuum/MavenPluginsError Any ideas? -- Wendy -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Trouble building maven-plugins parent pom in Continuum

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
I think Continuum needs to allow longer values in here - it certainly should not error out. On 10/03/2008, at 7:13 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even though it uses --non-recursive to build, the checkout does not exclude any

Re: Trouble building maven-plugins parent pom in Continuum

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
fields field name stash.maxSize=512name/name version1.0.9+/version typeString/type /field Which doens't look enough. 1024 ? -- Olivier 2008/3/9, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think Continuum needs to allow longer values in here - it certainly

Re: Confused about the branches

2008-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/03/2008, at 5:18 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: 2008/3/4, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 04/03/2008, at 10:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Agree on this. Currently there is a blocking issue with xml-rpc CONTINUUM-1590 which prevent using xml-rpc :-(. Cool - shall we just start using

Re: svn commit: r633704 - in /continuum/branches/continuum-1.x: ./ continuum-api/ continuum-commons/ continuum-configuration/ continuum-core-it/ continuum-core/ continuum-data-management/ continuum-da

2008-03-04 Thread Brett Porter
/instantiation- strategy /roleDefault /roleDefaults These all look to be in error because they refer to packages (not yet migrated). - Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Confused about the branches

2008-03-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 10:04 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: why 1.1.x? in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the branch

Re: Confused about the branches

2008-03-03 Thread Brett Porter
, set it as v1.2, and close the branch for now? If no objections, I will change root pom to not have anymore maven pom as parent. Sounds good - do you think we should have a Continuum parent POM like we do for Archiva? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: CI disabled for Continuum due to svn move

2008-03-01 Thread Brett Porter
to tell it where the source code moved, so we'll have to delete and re-add the projects. (Talking about using Continuuum to build Continuum is confusing...) -- Wendy -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn move (was: Re: Apache Continuum is now an Apache top level project)

2008-02-29 Thread Brett Porter
done :) On 01/03/2008, at 9:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, What about the sandbox content ? [1] Not sure it's well maintained code ;-). -- Olivier [1] : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/continuum/ 2008/2/28, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This has been done (and switch

Re: Continuum fisheye hosting

2008-02-29 Thread Brett Porter
notifying/asking infra ? Thanks, -- Olivier [1] https://support.atlassian.com/browse/FSH-580 -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn commit: r632127 - /maven/continuum/branches/continuum-1.x/pom.xml

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
/dependency /dependencies /dependencyManagement -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn move (was: Re: Apache Continuum is now an Apache top level project)

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
url. -- Wendy -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Confused about the branches

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
(1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use that for bugfixes only? WDYT? - Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Confused about the branches

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and none merged to the other. Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to 1.2-SNAPSHOT

Re: svn move (was: Re: Apache Continuum is now an Apache top level project)

2008-02-25 Thread Brett Porter
will can you do the move? I'll lock it in for Friday morning here (about 3 days from now): http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=2day=29year=2008hour=8min=0sec=0p1=240 Emmanuel On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Emmanuel

Re: Apache Continuum is now an Apache top level project

2008-02-21 Thread Brett Porter
group already. Cheers, Brett On 21/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Cool, great news. Thanks Brett (and others) Emmanuel On Feb 20, 2008 9:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted. We'll have some work

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-20 Thread Brett Porter
to comment on it. [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+2.0+Design+Discussion Emmanuel -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: wiki was: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/02/2008, at 4:04 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 10:01 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I've created two wiki's: ... http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CONTINUUMDEV/Index (exported to: http://cwiki.apache.org/CONTINUUMDEV/) This one is editable

Re: wiki was: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-12 Thread Brett Porter
Thakur wrote: If everyone is happy to keep the history till date on codehaus wiki, I can help copy stuff across to Apache wiki :-) Rahul Brett Porter wrote: We can create such a wiki any time - the challenge is converting existing content. If someone is happy to lose history and do

Re: wiki was: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-12 Thread Brett Porter
no, permissions changes are non-destructive :) On 13/02/2008, at 6:33 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: +1 as long as editing it requires a login :-) Should I hold off the migration from Codehaus? Rahul On Feb 13, 2008 6:32 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13/02/2008, at 4:04 PM, Wendy

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Brett Porter
on Apache wiki? Or, I guess it will have to wait for TLP vote. Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: This looks very exciting, and agree with most of the thread that follows. I'm just going to reply in summary - most of my thoughts are actually non-technical :) Regarding databases: I don't think xml

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Brett Porter
as the initial members of the Apache Continuum PMC: - Maria Odea Ching ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Olivier Lamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Trygve Laugstol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Brett Porter
On 06/02/2008, at 1:20 PM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez wrote: Just some thoughts, I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in the database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance. In line with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-28 Thread Brett Porter
:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote: So the poll for progressing seems in favour. Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/ committers, and a chair. I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-09 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks Rahul. I appreciate the thought, however I decline the nomination at this time :) On 08/01/2008, at 5:00 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote: And the nominations are. (~opens the envelope~) 1) Brett Porter , and 2) Jesse McConnell Cheers :-) Rahul Brett Porter wrote: of course

Re: Side effects of project groups page auto-refresh

2008-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
ISTR Emmanuel going through these at one point, so I expect there are not many that remain - you could look in the xwork.xml to see the ones that don't use redirect though. - Brett On 03/01/2008, at 4:42 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: The 'Project Groups' page automatically refreshes itself every

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2008-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
nominations? I have the current committers list as: Maria Odea Ching Joakim Erdfelt Olivier Lamy Trygve Laugstol Jesse McConnell Brett Porter Edwin Punzalan Carlos Sanchez Wendy Smoak Rahul Thakur Emmanuel Venisse Kenney Westerhof Andrew Williams Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should

Re: Splitting the website and documentation

2007-12-29 Thread Brett Porter
On 30/12/2007, at 2:55 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: I don't want to branch all of Continuum unless we're doing a 1.1.1 release, but we could branch just the continuum-docs module. Thoughts? The view I've started to take is that the documentation is best tied to the release at the time. If

Re: svn commit: r607431 - /maven/site/trunk/src/site/resources/.htaccess

2007-12-29 Thread Brett Porter
On 30/12/2007, at 2:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wsmoak Date: Sat Dec 29 07:45:18 2007 New Revision: 607431 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607431view=rev Log: Update redirects to latest Maven version. Add redirect for Continuum docs. Modified:

Re: svn commit: r607431 - /maven/site/trunk/src/site/resources/.htaccess

2007-12-29 Thread Brett Porter
done :) On 30/12/2007, at 12:48 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Dec 29, 2007 5:08 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/12/2007, at 2:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: maven/site/trunk/src/site/resources/.htaccess Should this go in Continuum's site .htaccess? It could

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2007-12-19 Thread Brett Porter
So, what's next? This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get started on it? From past experience the steps would be: - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in participating in the TLP - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC

Re: [vote] separate issues@ list

2007-12-09 Thread Brett Porter
:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote: per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett

Re: Continuum 1.1

2007-11-13 Thread Brett Porter
to prepare the release next Friday (Nov. 16) Before to do the release, I'll try (I'm not sure yet) to add pagination in the build results list page to save some memory when users call it for projects with lot of build results. Emmanuel -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http

customising emails

2007-11-05 Thread Brett Porter
clickthrough. - Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Re: customising emails

2007-11-05 Thread Brett Porter
But what if we only want to do this for one set of projects? Shouldn't that be a mail notifier property? On 05/11/2007, at 11:53 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: We can set includeBuildResult to false in application.xml Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, Got a request for vmbuild for a project

Re: customising emails

2007-11-05 Thread Brett Porter
np :) http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1545 On 06/11/2007, at 12:14 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: For the moment, it's a global option, but would be good to set it in the notifier configuration. Can you file an issue? Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : But what if we only want to do

converting from 1.0.3

2007-11-04 Thread Brett Porter
the bits to convert from other 1.1 alphas - but if the data management is working ok now then it might be a good alternative. - Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Re: build in error fix not working?

2007-10-18 Thread Brett Porter
I didn't keep track of the changes after this - was it fixed? On 24/09/2007, at 6:52 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hmm, I'll look at it to fix it definitively Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, Note this build: http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/ buildResults.action?projectId

Re: next release

2007-10-17 Thread Brett Porter
release? We have two choices: 1.1-beta-4 or 1.1 final. Personnally, I'd prefer 1.1 final. I tested all parts and all seems to be ok, I just need to test more the ANT/shell part. I'd like to prepare the Continuum release next week. Emmanuel -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http

Re: build definition used on build result

2007-09-24 Thread Brett Porter
if the scm update/checkout failed no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be hidden in the build result. Emmanuel -- Olivier 2007/9/23, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: * is this stored with the build result

Re: build definition used on build result

2007-09-24 Thread Brett Porter
It's empty too On 24/09/2007, at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett, you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too? If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the build is started. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : also when it is in progress On 24/09

build definitions in UI

2007-09-23 Thread Brett Porter
project(s) last in the line - change all the group buttons to be consistent: edit group, delete group, release group, build group - add release project(s) to the bottom - put build project(s), build group and add project on lines of their own Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog

build in error fix not working?

2007-09-23 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, Note this build: http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/ buildResults.action?projectId=272projectGroupId=8 It is stuck in error - but I thought this was fixed in beta-3? Could it be because it is an error on SCM update that it isn't detected as fixed? - Brett -- Brett Porter

Re: Continuum Model and Modello

2007-09-21 Thread Brett Porter
). Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP

2007-09-21 Thread Brett Porter
in a project. I think everything is on track here - the first focus should be on getting 1.1 out of course, but if we keep doing what we are doing this totally makes sense. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

turning off continuum_ci.sh?

2007-09-07 Thread Brett Porter
Now that Continuum is self-hosting, shall we turn off the hourly build to save some cpu cycles? - Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Re: [jira] Closed: (CONTINUUM-358) User Authentication via LDAP

2007-09-01 Thread Brett Porter
- For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Re: error states

2007-08-29 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone have any thoughts on this? On 20/08/2007, at 10:59 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I think I understand this problem more now. the svn errors are a transient problem - it occurs before a build takes place, but they are recorded as a built result. So when they succeed again, no build occurs

Re: error states

2007-08-29 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/08/2007, at 7:48 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: 2) rebuild a project that was in error state before. I think it's the best solution for now and won't be a lot of work. agreed... can we sneak this into the 1.1 JIRA? :D Only the first would also address the problem of having

CONTINUUM-605: notification feature

2007-08-22 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I know where in feature freeze, but I'd really like this and it has a patch :) Anyone think it is worth considering? - Brett

Anyone seen Continuum hanging in recent versions?

2007-08-22 Thread Brett Porter
We get this occasionally on vmbuild1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/ browse/INFRA-1326 I've not yet seen it on the zone. There's nothing in the logs to report. Anyone seen this? Cheers, Brett

Re: error states

2007-08-19 Thread Brett Porter
, and it might be better to schedule that for the future and fix it via (2) for 1.1. what do others think? - Brett On 16/08/2007, at 1:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote: I'm also seeing where there is a real error, like the SVN server not being reachable, and it not trying to build ever again. On 16/08/2007

Re: Continuum on vmbuild machines at apache.

2007-08-16 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks for the heads up. One issue is that it was using an old instance that had stalled and meant to be shut down, the other is the problem I reported on the list yesterday about the stuck error state. - Brett On 17/08/2007, at 6:35 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Looks like the Cocoon and

Re: [jira] Commented: (CONTINUUM-1234) Improve user role management

2007-08-16 Thread Brett Porter
], not continuum-dev.) we only have one issues list, and it sets the reply-to (not JIRA). -- Wendy On 8/16/07, Brett Porter (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1234? page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel#action_105065

brief notes: upgrading 1.1-beta-1 to 1.1-beta-2

2007-08-16 Thread Brett Porter
Here's what I did (this is a once off thing, though we really need to make sure changes are backwards compatible and can handle missing metadata in the future...) - run data-management from 1.1-beta-1 to export the build database (I had to build this from source) - edit the exported

Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.1-beta-2

2007-08-15 Thread Brett Porter
+1 I gave it the basic run through - added a project, some profiles, checked the licenses. All is well. Very nice work everyone that's done stuff. It's starting to shape up well! - Brett On 15/08/2007, at 12:56 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Continuum 1.1-beta-2 is ready for release

Re: Solving the notification problem

2007-08-15 Thread Brett Porter
-beta-2 but I'll try for 1.1-beta-3 Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Did I understand the summary to be the following to improvement requests to file? 1) for group notifiers, don't send a mail if another build is scheduled in the group already (instead, have the results added to the mail

error states

2007-08-15 Thread Brett Porter
I see too often project's getting stuck in error state, and it's quite hard to diagnose what's wrong. They don't automatically recover, and there is no build result for the actual error (so clicking the icon takes you to the last successful one) Anyone have any thoughts on how we can

Re: error states

2007-08-15 Thread Brett Porter
I'm also seeing where there is a real error, like the SVN server not being reachable, and it not trying to build ever again. On 16/08/2007, at 1:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote: I see too often project's getting stuck in error state, and it's quite hard to diagnose what's wrong. They don't

Re: [continuum build trunk - FAILED - update] Wed Aug 15 03:00:01 GMT 2007

2007-08-14 Thread Brett Porter
is this just a bad env on the zone? might be a hint that the release stuff could have a problem with certain environments too - worth checking. On 15/08/2007, at 3:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/trunk/continuum-build-

[OT] Mini-interview with Emmanuel Venisse

2007-08-06 Thread Brett Porter
Hi all, I already posted this to the users@ list, but I thought some folk here might be more particularly interested in what Emmanuel had to say when we talked recently: http://www.devzuz.org/?q=node/12. Enjoy! Cheers, Brett

Re: Solving the notification problem

2007-08-06 Thread Brett Porter
notifier itself. Default is off for consistency with current behaviour. 2) add a threshold of messages, particularly for errors - don't send a message that is identical to one sent in the last X hours. Cheers, Brett On 02/08/2007, at 6:26 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit

Re: Two week sprints on Continuum Beta releases?

2007-08-02 Thread Brett Porter
Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, How do people feel about planning betas to fit into: Aug 15, Aug 29, Sep 12, Sep 26? (for releases, votes are the monday before) If so, is the current beta-2 list achievable by Aug 15? Looks like it needs to be trimmed (and we also have 11 unscheduled to find a home

Re: Solving the notification problem

2007-08-01 Thread Brett Porter
On 02/08/2007, at 7:46 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: For a project notifier, I think we can keep what we have actually, but for a group notifier, we can send a single mail by project group. The mail can be sent after the build of the latest project of the group, I don't think it will be a

Re: Solving the notification problem

2007-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
On 01/08/2007, at 12:01 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: well, 1.1 is in beta now so ideally no more features, but maybe we just call this a bug fix for now.. yeah, I'm looking more for a small improvement than a revolution. Avoiding schema changes and such. I really should have said something

Database model change for beta-1

2007-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I've narrowed down the problem in upgrading from alpha-2 to beta-1 to the following model change: field namebuildDefinition/name version1.1.0+/version association xml.reference=true stash.part=true jpox.dependent=false

Re: some issues for rescheduling?

2007-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone have any thoughts on these, or should I just go ahead and make the changes? (Sorry Emmanuel, I know you've been offline a bit recently :) Cheers, Brett On 25/07/2007, at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Thanks Brett, I'll review them. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, I took

some issues for rescheduling?

2007-07-24 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I took a look through future for things that could be adjusted, and came up with the following list. I didn't want to 'just do it', since I'm not that close to the status of the project right now, so if someone could review these it'd be much appreciated. to close: CONTINUUM-933

Re: Heads up regarding VMBuild

2007-07-19 Thread Brett Porter
So, is anyone interested? On 11/07/2007, at 11:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi folks, I'm currently doing the rounds of all the people using Continuum on VMBuild. The set up on there ballooned despite the box being underpowered and the installation intended to be experimental, so

Re: Proposition for CONTINUUM-798

2007-07-11 Thread Brett Porter
This sounds fine to me. Questions I think weren't answered here: - how do you track when the modules change - by comparing modules to the list of projects in a group? If so, how to handle the edge cases where extra projects are added to or removed from a group aside from the modules? - how

Re: Proposition for CONTINUUM-798

2007-07-11 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/07/2007, at 5:51 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit : This sounds fine to me. Questions I think weren't answered here: - how do you track when the modules change - by comparing modules to the list of projects in a group? If so, how to handle the edge cases where

features scheduled after 1.1-beta-1

2007-07-11 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I haven't looked beyond this issue - so there may be more - but I see CONTINUUM-761 is a new feature scheduled for 1.1-beta-2. Shouldn't this be in beta-1, or a future version? - Brett

Heads up regarding VMBuild

2007-07-11 Thread Brett Porter
Hi folks, I'm currently doing the rounds of all the people using Continuum on VMBuild. The set up on there ballooned despite the box being underpowered and the installation intended to be experimental, so was never very well maintained. We have a new box to move vmbuild to now and with

Re: continuum 1.1-beta-1 update

2007-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
On 03/07/2007, at 5:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Jesse McConnell a écrit : Just to capture some talk on irc today... I think the strategy moving forward is going to be get some of jira cleaned up a la the recent maven jira push and continuum 1.1 is going to get wrapped up a bit for the

Re: Jetty proxy config required?

2007-06-30 Thread Brett Porter
I believe you can use that configuration, but like you I never have, just pointing it directly at :8080 from httpd. On 01/07/2007, at 3:11 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: Is the Jetty Configuration section on this page up to date? http://maven.apache.org/continuum/guides/mini/guide-

Re: svn commit: r546588 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-data-management/data-management-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/management/ continuum-data-management/data-management-jdo

2007-06-12 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/06/2007, at 5:49 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 12 Jun 07, at 11:37 AM 12 Jun 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Tue Jun 12 11:37:19 2007 New Revision: 546588 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=546588 Log: other aspect of CORE-3297 requires a patch to OID instead

JDK 5 in Continuum

2007-06-04 Thread Brett Porter
If my memory serves, we had decided we were ready to take this step for the applications, but not Maven itself until the toolchain support is final. Any objections? - Brett On 05/06/2007, at 2:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Mon Jun 4 09:32:12 2007 New Revision:

Trunk won't build

2007-05-31 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone else have the problem of the 5 failing tests in continuum-core on trunk? I only get them building from the top level, and it's been a long standing problem. testAddMavenTwoProjectSet (org.apache.maven.continuum.DefaultContinuumTest) testUpdateMavenTwoProject

Re: [VOTE] release continuum-1.1-alpha-2

2007-05-31 Thread Brett Porter
+1. Gave it a quick fire up on the Mac. - Brett On 31/05/2007, at 6:38 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: I would like to get alpha-2 released to the community now. Highlights are: revamped xml-rpc support converted to use rebranded plexus-security, aka redback continuum maven plugin many bug

Re: Allowing the file protocol in 1.1-alpha-1

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
I don't think it's possible to put it anywhere other than the webapp META-INF location at this point, without changing the way it's configured. - Brett On 20/05/2007, at 11:24 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: In the FAQ [1] we say to uncomment an allowedScheme element in

Re: Allowing the file protocol in 1.1-alpha-1

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
- I'm honestly not sure. - Brett On 21/05/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 5/20/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it's possible to put it anywhere other than the webapp META-INF location at this point, without changing the way it's configured. On the Deploying page

Re: svn commit: r535724 - in /maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main: java/org/apache/maven/continuum/web/bean/ProjectGroupUserBean.java webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/projectGroupMembers.jsp

2007-05-11 Thread Brett Porter
Did you update this particular commit with svn pe --revprop -r535724 svn:log ? On 09/05/2007, at 7:40 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Ok, I'll take note of that Trygve Laugstøl wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: oching Date: Sun May 6 20:34:07 2007 New Revision: 535724 URL:

is alpha 1 really released?

2007-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
I'm trying to find the official release, and I can only find the file in Jesse's home directory, and no announcement. Bit lost. Can we do these? - put in the main repo - put in /dist/ - put on the website - announce to lists / blogs Cheers, Brett

Re: is alpha 1 really released?

2007-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
On 02/05/2007, at 4:10 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: there was discussion on this on another thread on this list...but I will reiterate here that I feel uncomfortable shoving big war files and these alpha-1 artifacts into the main repository. No one is programming against these things in the

Re: DB schema migration

2007-05-02 Thread Brett Porter
the migration tool. - Brett On 24/04/2007, at 7:35 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote: Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Erik - the problem in upgrading is the changes in private tables between versions of jpox that we hadn't given explicit names to. We'd probably appreciate most help in future proofing our

Re: DB schema migration

2007-04-24 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks Erik - I'll give that a try ASAP. On 24/04/2007, at 7:35 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote: Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Erik - the problem in upgrading is the changes in private tables between versions of jpox that we hadn't given explicit names to. We'd probably appreciate most

Re: DB schema migration

2007-04-23 Thread Brett Porter
This was one of the things I was going to try and have done before alpha-1 - I just forgot. Erik - the problem in upgrading is the changes in private tables between versions of jpox that we hadn't given explicit names to. We'd probably appreciate most help in future proofing our jpox use a

Re: DB schema migration

2007-04-23 Thread Brett Porter
potential DB keyword conflicts jesse On 4/23/07, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I be sure at least that the DB model won't change as from alpha-1? If so I can maybe drop completely my database and recreate my projects. Thanks, Stéphane On 4/23/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

2007-03-07 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/03/2007, at 9:52 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: Ok, well the little poll thread I made seemed to be strongly in favor of getting things pulled together to start getting alpha releases out of continuum. So with that in mind here is a list of a few things that we need to get in order for an

Re: Poll: release continuum alpha

2007-02-24 Thread Brett Porter
Agreed. Someone needs to: - properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release - add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise that and then make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the basic 1-to-1 conversions) - probably write a little CLI to fire it off. On 24/02/2007,

Re: Poll: release continuum alpha

2007-02-24 Thread Brett Porter
I agree with an alpha-1 labelled release. I think someone will need to flush JIRA before cutting the release (close things that are no longer relevant, or fixed, or duplicate). - Brett On 24/02/2007, at 8:35 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed

Re: oching, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-02-20 Thread Brett Porter
Actually, it's continuum-commits. However, I already did the -allow thing in case she was subscribed under a different address. On 20/02/2007, at 5:44 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: your commit emails are beeing moderated. -- Trygve

Re: svn commit: r509415 [1/3] - in /maven/continuum/trunk: continuum-security/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/security/p rofile/ continuum-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/we

2007-02-20 Thread Brett Porter
Can you do svn propedit svn:log -r509415 --revprop And add that to the front? - Brett On 20/02/2007, at 8:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Wendy, This is for CONTINUUM-1147 Thanks, Deng On 2/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: oching Date: Mon Feb 19

Moving configuration service to plexus-registry

2007-02-09 Thread Brett Porter
Any objections to me moving the configuration service out of the database (and take some of the bits out of application.xml) and putting them in the registry? Basically the same thing I've just done for Archiva. Docs on the registry are here: https://svn.codehaus.org/plexus/plexus-

Re: Trusting in our own dog food

2007-01-16 Thread Brett Porter
working copy is up-to-date Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : That doesn't actually matter for the client side speed boost. I'm running 1.4.2 on continuum now. - Brett On 15/01/2007, at 2:21 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: The svn.apache.org server is a little old too: Powered by Subversion version 1.3.1

Re: Trusting in our own dog food

2007-01-16 Thread Brett Porter
Ok, fair enough. I've left it on, and made it use a different local repository. I'd say once we release Continuum 1.1 and are happy it is stable enough to use, we can turn this off. On 15/01/2007, at 11:02 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: Brett Porter wrote: so... you're saying you don't

Re: Continuum and svn connections

2007-01-05 Thread Brett Porter
I saw it yesterday too. I actually had the problem before svn kicked in, as far as I could tell. ie, retrieving POMs might be the problem. On 06/01/2007, at 9:30 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: The ASF Subversion server limits connections to 10 per IP address, and with several ASF projects loaded up,

Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery

2007-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
../mymodule Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Great - can the patch be used as a starting point? On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit : Hi Jesse, I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good feature - is the patch a good enough start

Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery

2007-01-02 Thread Brett Porter
Great - can the patch be used as a starting point? On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit : Hi Jesse, I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now? It was submitted by John

  1   2   3   4   >