Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-07 Thread Rahul Thakur
snipped 1-2)I would like to bring Guice to the mix. I think it is worth investigating for Continuum 2.0 - WDYT? I need a reason to drop the current set of technologies, why is the new set better etc. My motivations behind this were: # leverage Java 5 language and other library

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-07 Thread Rahul Thakur
Here's my list: 1) Peformance improvements. 2) A slicker User Interface. Ability to let the user work in an offline mode (Google Gears!) and sync periodically. 3) Good user and developer documentation. 4) Better public APIs (rework Store and Continuum) Rahul Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-07 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
1. +1 on distributed builds, along with examples on the 2 main use cases I see for distributed builds: a. building on many platforms for native builds that need multiple distributions. b. distribute the build across many machines to decrease the latency of building everything.