Is this stil lrequired after the other fix?
If so, can we be more specific about the caught exception?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Tue Nov 15 08:48:36 2005
New Revision: 344392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344392&view=rev
Log:
Retry the update if derby generate a lock exception
Modified:
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
Modified:
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java?rev=344392&r1=344391&r2=344392&view=diff
==============================================================================
---
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
(original)
+++
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
Tue Nov 15 08:48:36 2005
@@ -472,7 +472,15 @@
throw new ContinuumStoreException( "Not detached: " + object );
}
- pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+ try
+ {
+ pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+ }
+ catch ( Exception e )
+ {
+ //We retry if we obtain an exceptio like a dead lock
+ pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+ }
tx.commit();
}