Is this stil lrequired after the other fix?

If so, can we be more specific about the caught exception?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Tue Nov 15 08:48:36 2005
New Revision: 344392

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344392&view=rev
Log:
Retry the update if derby generate a lock exception

Modified:
    
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java

Modified: 
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java?rev=344392&r1=344391&r2=344392&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
 (original)
+++ 
maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-store/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/JdoContinuumStore.java
 Tue Nov 15 08:48:36 2005
@@ -472,7 +472,15 @@
                 throw new ContinuumStoreException( "Not detached: " + object );
             }
- pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+            try
+            {
+                pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+            }
+            catch ( Exception e )
+            {
+                //We retry if we obtain an exceptio like a dead lock
+                pm.attachCopy( object, true );
+            }
tx.commit();
         }


Reply via email to