On 07/03/18 15:19, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 01/03/18 18:31, Robert Varga wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> TL;DR:
>> Implementation of Binding Specification V1 needs to be improved in a way
>> that breaks the ability to load Fluorine-generated code in older containers.
>>
>> Are there any objections
Although Robert already explained this well in his original email, there
are some additional notes [0] from the kernel call that also elaborate on
this proposal. To summarize, no one raised much concern surrounding the
potential impacts, and the change seems straightforward and necessary.
Regards
On 01/03/18 18:31, Robert Varga wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> TL;DR:
> Implementation of Binding Specification V1 needs to be improved in a way
> that breaks the ability to load Fluorine-generated code in older containers.
>
> Are there any objections to doing that?
No objections have been raised
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Robert Varga wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> TL;DR:
> Implementation of Binding Specification V1 needs to be improved in a way
> that breaks the ability to load Fluorine-generated code in older
> containers.
>
> Are there any objections to doing that?
>
>
> PROBLEM:
>
Hello everyone,
TL;DR:
Implementation of Binding Specification V1 needs to be improved in a way
that breaks the ability to load Fluorine-generated code in older containers.
Are there any objections to doing that?
PROBLEM:
Recent change in yangtools to properly support pattern constraints
(YANGT
