Re: [controller-dev] Binding V1 codegen in Fluorine

2018-03-07 Thread Robert Varga
On 01/03/18 18:31, Robert Varga wrote: > Hello everyone, > > TL;DR: > Implementation of Binding Specification V1 needs to be improved in a way > that breaks the ability to load Fluorine-generated code in older containers. > > Are there any objections to doing that? No objections have been

Re: [controller-dev] Binding V1 codegen in Fluorine

2018-03-07 Thread Ryan Goulding
Although Robert already explained this well in his original email, there are some additional notes [0] from the kernel call that also elaborate on this proposal. To summarize, no one raised much concern surrounding the potential impacts, and the change seems straightforward and necessary.

Re: [controller-dev] [release] Binding V1 codegen in Fluorine

2018-03-07 Thread Robert Varga
On 07/03/18 17:24, Faseela K wrote: > Hi Robert, > >    From the details, for the downstream consumers is it just going to be > just version change in the dependency? For 'downstream' as in within ODL it's not going to be even that (as mdsal is integrated on snapshots). For downstreams outside