In case anyone is curious, the newer reiserfsck from Cooker was able to
fix my file system. --check ran and told me I had to run --rebuild-tree,
which repaired the problem.
Thanks to all.
--
Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org
Hello,
Using the latest cooker, I found by mistake a segfault in cdialog.
I'm using cdialog-0.9a-8mdk from 8.2. Here comes the segfault, with backtrace
if that can help (this trace is made with cdialog compiled from source rpm,
and a modified makefile to have debug symbols).
Sorry I have no time
--- Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try:
> > urpmi --auto-select | awk
> '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){print
> > $i}}'
>
> that's insane.
> think about it. having to type out --auto-select
> instead of maybe -as is
> already too much typing for such a frequently used
> command.
That's not
The latest KDE3 rpms (under contrib) seem to have an issue.
Last night, I did "rpm -Fvh kde*" from my local contrib mirror (rsync from
proxad.net--currently kde*3-3.0-18mdk.) After doing so, I did a re-boot and
tried to log in. What I got was a pretty blue screen, with a mouse pointer
and no
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 12:00, David Walser wrote:
> --- Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if it would be possible to have some
> > \n's added to urpmi so
> > that when I run urpmi --auto-select and there are
> > several packages to install
> > they aren't all
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 01:57 pm, nDiScReEt wrote:
> >
> > I believe andrej must have been having an off day. 8)
>
> Yeah, I still respect him tho'. In my defense, I had posted to the
> expert list but I didn't ever receive a single nibble. Not even a "Try
> Cooker or the Forum".
Didn't Richar
On Thursdayen den 2 May 2002 00.22, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:36, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 23.14, Michael Reinsch wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Mit, 01 Mai 2002 18:16:30 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > > > * Thu May 02 2002 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PRO
Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Mit, 01 Mai 2002 18:16:30 Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> > * Thu May 02 2002 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6.40.2-42mdk
>
> Some of the /etc/init.d/* scripts (I only tried alsa and kudzu before
> I went back to the old version...) seem
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:36, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 23.14, Michael Reinsch wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mit, 01 Mai 2002 18:16:30 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > > * Thu May 02 2002 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6.40.2-42mdk
> >
> > Some of the /etc/init.d/* scripts (I
On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 23.14, Michael Reinsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mit, 01 Mai 2002 18:16:30 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > * Thu May 02 2002 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6.40.2-42mdk
>
> Some of the /etc/init.d/* scripts (I only tried alsa and kudzu before I
> went back to the old versio
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 05:27 pm, Salane King wrote:
> Perhaps someone can answer this. kde-devel seems to ignore this question
> when asked earlier I am using cooker versions of libqt3 and libqt3-devel
> and autoconf 2.5. automake 1.5 that I compiled myself.
> gcc-2.96 and g++-2.96 from cooker
Perhaps someone can answer this. kde-devel seems to ignore this question when
asked earlier I am using cooker versions of libqt3 and libqt3-devel and
autoconf 2.5. automake 1.5 that I compiled myself.
gcc-2.96 and g++-2.96 from cooker.
I see no body complaining about this so it must be my cu
Hi!
On Mit, 01 Mai 2002 18:16:30 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> * Thu May 02 2002 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6.40.2-42mdk
Some of the /etc/init.d/* scripts (I only tried alsa and kudzu before I
went back to the old version...) seem to be broken in this package. They
complain about unknown
On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 21.32, Teemu Torma wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 May 2002 20:27, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 19.36, blindauer Emmanuel wrote:
> > > "urpmi --auto-select" should be what your looking for.
> >
> > Thanks, but it just sits there and does nothing whe
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 20:27, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 19.36, blindauer Emmanuel wrote:
> > "urpmi --auto-select" should be what your looking for.
>
> Thanks, but it just sits there and does nothing when I use that switch.
If it is a big update, I have noticed it tak
--- Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if it would be possible to have some
> \n's added to urpmi so
> that when I run urpmi --auto-select and there are
> several packages to install
> they aren't all clumped together on one line.
Try:
urpmi --auto-select | awk '{
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:27, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 19.36, blindauer Emmanuel wrote:
> > "urpmi --auto-select" should be what your looking for.
>
> Thanks, but it just sits there and does nothing when I use that switch.
>
you first need to do
urpmi.update section_to_
Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if it would be possible to have some \n's added to urpmi so
> that when I run urpmi --auto-select and there are several packages to install
> they aren't all clumped together on one line. As it is I find it very hard to
> skim
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible to have some \n's added to urpmi so
that when I run urpmi --auto-select and there are several packages to install
they aren't all clumped together on one line. As it is I find it very hard to
skim through the list of packages that it's going to want t
On Wednesdayen den 1 May 2002 19.36, blindauer Emmanuel wrote:
> "urpmi --auto-select" should be what your looking for.
Thanks, but it just sits there and does nothing when I use that switch.
> Emmanuel
>
> Le Mercredi 1 Mai 2002 19:17, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Feature request.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"urpmi --auto-select" should be what your looking for.
Emmanuel
Le Mercredi 1 Mai 2002 19:17, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Feature request.
>
> Would it be possible to have urpmi not gunzipping the hdlists file at every
> invocation? Could urpm
÷ ÷ÓË, 28.04.2002, × 20:00, Borsenkow Andrej ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> Anybody has problems with current Galeon and proxies? It shows directly
> available pages just fine but segfaults on proxy access. Proxy needs
> authorization, but previous version did run just fine. Mozilla does not
> have any problems as we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 1 Mai 2002 19:17, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Feature request.
>
> Would it be possible to have urpmi not gunzipping the hdlists file at every
> invocation? Could urpmi be modified to use a "uncompressed" hdlists file?
>
> I'm updati
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:45:38AM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> Warly, sorry to Cc to you but I do not know who is responsible for errata.
vdanen is.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless,
whether the m
Hi,
Feature request.
Would it be possible to have urpmi not gunzipping the hdlists file at every
invocation? Could urpmi be modified to use a "uncompressed" hdlists file?
I'm updating a P90 machine like this:
for i in `rpm -qa --qf "[%{NAME}]\n"`; do urpmi --auto $i; done
I'm sure there are
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 11:56 pm, nDiScReEt wrote:
> > You are in the wrong list, sorry.
> >
> > -andrej
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> My apologies. I thought this would be the perfect list for partitioning
> a cooker installation with another distribution already installed.
I believe andrej must ha
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:19:35 -0400
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:06:37 +0200
> Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Preparing...#
> > > #
> > > file /lib/libgcc_s
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [plug] OpenOffice.org 1.0 Launch
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 20:38:33 +0800
From: Jacqueline McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OPENOFFICE.ORG COMMUNITY ANNOUNCES OPENOFFICE.ORG 1.
The 4.2.0 in Cooker has a horribly broken Xinerama on Matrox G450s. It
hangs GNOME apps (like gnomecc and evo) and crashes KDE2's kicker, etc.
Since my previous post about this brought zero response, I'm considering
rolling back to 4.1.0 until Cooker has a usable XF/Xinerama. What
consequences can
Hi Cookers,
I have Cooker on a chrooted partition and now I thought it was time to
actually try to boot it too, but no..., when running lilo I get "Fatal:
Kernel doesn't support initial RAM disks". I think I've seen this before but
I just can't remember the cure...
(I've done some searching o
30 matches
Mail list logo
