Before I forget,
A few month ago just before release I made this srpm:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/rpms/mktemp-1.4-1mdk.src.rpm
Which is an update to the current mktemp-package. The code is from the
author and was released december last year instead of the two year old
code in the cur
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:11:39AM +0100, François Pons wrote:
> Sorry, too late, this is done now.
Good answer. :)
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols
Le jeu 12/12/2002 à 02:55, Ben Reser a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> > Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each
> > packagename so it becomes human-readable?
> > Even better sorted by alphabet too
>
> I've always wi
> All I have to say is that guy is asking for it...
What is the worse that can happen? a "cease and desist"?
;oP
Damian
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626
Product: rpmdrake
Component: rpmdrake
Summary: failed installation unselects all selected packages
Version: 2.0-18mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
Since most of the brains float about this list if i have a stock 9.0
will i need any cooker rpms to view tv?
(my system has been upgraded from a intel 815 and Hauppage tv card combo
to the ati AIW 7500)
Off list pointers to how-tos or the howtos themsevles would be nice.
tried to use GATOS but it c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Walluck) writes:
> Apparently, it doesn't execute /etc/emacs/site-start.el, so none of the
> files in /etc/emacs/site-start.d/ are getting loaded (which would
> include /etc/emacs/site-start.d/rpm.el).
odd, it does for me 21.2.92-1mdk.
--
Chmouel -- http://www.chmouel
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:30:36PM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
> [Contrib-RPM]
>
> --=-=-=
> Name: esmtpRelocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 2mdk Build Date: Wed
> > I haven't tried it. His site is SERIOUSLY freshmeated. hehe
> > I'm sure Ben's is better because it's Mandrake specific, but it will be
> > very interesting to see if this new rpm lasts. Maybe we will gain some
> > insight on MS's true feelings on the subject.
>
> All I have to say is that
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
> PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
> I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
> on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
> is a way to better und
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Scherer) writes:
Is this what you are talking about ?
no it is not i am talking about the /etc/emacs/*/* stuff.
Actually, this seems somewhat broken in the current release
emacs-21.2.92-1mdk.
Apparently, it doesn't execute /etc/emacs/si
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each
> packagename so it becomes human-readable?
> Even better sorted by alphabet too
I've always wished for that too...
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
htt
Hi...
I am getting tons of messages like this on syslog:
Dec 12 02:01:31 werewolf pam_timestamp_check: pam_timestamp: `/' owner GID != 0
Dec 12 02:02:06 werewolf last message repeated 7 times
Dec 12 02:03:11 werewolf last message repeated 13 times
Dec 12 02:04:16 werewolf last message repeated 13
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Scherer) writes:
> Is this what you are talking about ?
no it is not i am talking about the /etc/emacs/*/* stuff.
--
Chmouel -- http://www.chmouel.com/
> The problem is that currently there is no such mechanism to
> dynamically load extensions/mode for vim like we do for emacs as per
> packages.
Hum, what about
autocmd BufRead *.spec source ~/.vim/rpm_mode
this run the command 'source ~/.vim/rpm_mode', which , obviouly, apply the
command from ~
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
> While we are speaking of tools to make life easier to build rpm, i'd like to
> point out the spec plugin i've written for vim some times ago, as the basic
> spec plugin from vim plainly sux.
> It is available from http://vim.sourceforge.net/script.p
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:06:45PM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
> Hmmm I tried Bens rpm, which didn't work somehow. Then I remembered this
> project:
>
> http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/
>
> Which had a spec-file which looked surprisingly familiar with the slight
> difference that it worked fine.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:20:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just installed MS fonts by using Ben's bootstrap RPM.
> For some reason I could not get these fonts to appear in the font
> selection of gnome terminal. (This is just a one example)
>
> Does anybody have an idea what is getti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han Boetes) writes:
> And zsh completes Makefiles targets much better than rpm options. :)
hugh, why ?
--
Chmouel -- http://www.chmouel.com/
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 11:03 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> Since there was some worry going
> on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
> is a way to better understand the situation. Some guy has gone and made
> a REAL rpm of all the MS fonts, including Tahoma and
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:58:59PM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Ah, I misinterpretes something. I thought esmtp was also listening. It is
> for sending out purpose only, right?
Yup... it's simply a mail injector to accept mail for programs like mutt
that inject mail through the /usr/sbin/sen
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625
Product: kernel-source
Component: kernel-source
Summary: Kernel Compile ( make bzImage ) fails while compiling
DRM for the Intel 810 graphics chipset.
Version: 2.4.20-2mdk
Platfo
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-12 00:23 ---
i upgraded to the newest cooker today ( that means gnome-panel-2.1.4 ),
and nothing changed. the problem as reported in bug619 still remains.
the problem described here
On Tue Dec 10 8:55 +, John Allen wrote:
> After all mkinitrd uses awk, and thats in /usr/bin
Uhhh... no.
[root@tatiana root]# which awk
/bin/awk
[root@tatiana root]# ls -l `which awk`
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Oct 15 16:24 /bin/awk ->
gawk*
[root@tatiana root]# which gawk
/b
That was a bug indeed present in 3.2-1mdk. However, it now works with
3.2-4mdk and FSF GNU C++ version 3.2.2 20021211 (prerelease).
@resolution=fixed
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-11 21:53 ---
[root@Castle scott]# urpmi mplayer
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (30 MB):
libdha0.1-0.90-0.rc1.3plf.i586
libfaad2_0-1.1-2plf.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Alaa has uploaded pekwm-0.1.2-1mdk.src.rpm
a lightweight, yet aesthetic window manager. It
features fully customizable key and mousebindings, dockapp support,
window grouping (similar to the features you may have seen in pwm or
fluxbox, except th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've just uploaded gtkspell 2.0.3 SRPM to the ./incoming directory
- --
-
- -- Katoob Main Developer
Linux registered user # 224950
ICQ # 58475622
FIRST make it run, THEN make it run fast "Brian Kernighan".
-BEGIN PGP
On 11 Dec 2002 13:37:28 -0500
John Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use gnome2 and metacity-2.4.8-1mdk. When I use gnome2 and sawfish, the
> problem doesn't exist.
In that relation it would not affect mine since I run enlightenment and use Only the
gnome-panel with it.
Charles
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I found two more mozilla bugs. I haven't yet reported them to
bugzilla.mozilla.org, but will sometime soon. At least one will require
a bit of testing by others:
1)Mozilla crash on resizing message pane in mail
I am not going to test this again right
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:24, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2002 13:09:43 -0500
> John Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This problem
> > doesn't exist with auto-hide disabled.
>
>
> I'm using the panel with auto-hide and have no problem with the icons, but all my
>icons on the pan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Lyons wrote:
> Buchan Milne wrote on Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0200 :
>
>>Some background
>>1)Samba-vscan allows on-access scanning of files by samba, and will deny
>>access (and in the latest version, inform the user by windows message
>>t
On 11 Dec 2002 13:09:43 -0500
John Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This problem
> doesn't exist with auto-hide disabled.
I'm using the panel with auto-hide and have no problem with the icons, but all my
icons on the panel were manually placed.(i.e. started with an empty panel and added
th
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 09 December 2002 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when
> > > your fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed m
Hello,
I'm using gnome-panel-2.1.4-2mdk with auto-hide enabled. I've noticed
that whenever the panel is redisplayed, all icons are missing. However,
as I move my cursor across the panel, each icon reappears. This problem
doesn't exist with auto-hide disabled.
John
This has been around for some time now - SYLPHEED and XINE-DVDNAV
Any reason for this?
Thx,
R.Fox
[root@amda7v cooker]# mkcd --check /mnt/hd/cooker
mkcd:
mkcd: Checking the hdlists, depslist and RPMs consistency
checkDiscs: duplicate version in
/mnt/hd/cooker/Mandrake/base/depslist.ordered:
sy
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:01, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Emacs one is there, seems someone wants to start a flamewar ;-)
>
> [bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ rpm -ql rpm-build|grep emacs
> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/rpm.el
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rpm-spec-mode.el
Oh didn't realize that.
The rpm how-to shou
I just installed MS fonts by using Ben's bootstrap RPM.
For some reason I could not get these fonts to appear in the font
selection of gnome terminal. (This is just a one example)
Does anybody have an idea what is getting wrong?
Mika
Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Austin Acton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
> I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
> on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM,
> here is a way to better understand the situation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Acton wrote:
> It would be great to get the vim and emacs spec-mode plugins
> incorporated into rpm-tools, including .spec file detection.
> They are both great tools.
Emacs one is there, seems someone wants to start a flamewar ;-)
[bgmilne@bg
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.0-9mdk|2.0-27mdk
--- Additional Comments
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|xmms|KDE
Product|xmms
It would be great to get the vim and emacs spec-mode plugins
incorporated into rpm-tools, including .spec file detection.
They are both great tools.
Now what I want to know is, when is somebody going to write a spec-mode
plugin for gedit?
:-)
Austin
(or documentation on gedit plugins, for that matt
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better understand the situation. Some guy has gone and made
a REAL rpm of all t
While we are speaking of tools to make life easier to build rpm, i'd like to
point out the spec plugin i've written for vim some times ago, as the basic
spec plugin from vim plainly sux.
It is available from http://vim.sourceforge.net/script.php?script_id=98, and
maybe it could get integrated in
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002, 09:59:53 Uhr MET, schrieb Charles A Edwards:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:45:39 +0100 (CET)
> Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Name: gstreamerRelocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 0.5.0 Vend
"[Bug 500]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I mean it is activated but doesn't work :
>
> chkconfig --list numlock gives:
> numlock 0:Arrêt 1:Arrêt 2:Arrêt 3:Marche4:Marche5:Marche
> 6:Arrêt
>
> service numlock status
> numlock is enabled
Well, it works for me
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:45:39 +0100 (CET)
Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Name: gstreamerRelocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.5.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed Dec 11 0
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 09:13, Han Boetes wrote:
> To facilitate the making of rpms I made this Makefile:
>
>http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/rpms/Makefile
Oi that's nice.
Especially 'short'. That's handy dandy.
Thanks,
Austin
> --
> Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
>
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-11 15:35 ---
Not true on ML9.0, what are you running?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Hi,
To facilitate the making of rpms I made this Makefile:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/rpms/Makefile
So instead of ``rpm -ba --clean --sign SPECS/fluxbox.spec'' I can now simply
type ``make''
Or instead of rpm --clean I can type ``make clean'' or instead of
``rpmlint -i SRPMS/fluxbo
Le mer 11/12/2002 à 14:07, Jesper Krogh a écrit :
> Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each
> packagename so it becomes human-readable?
> Even better sorted by alphabet too
This sounds like not to be a bad idea, so look at 13mdk of urpmi.
François.
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 10:43, François Pons wrote:
> Le mar 10/12/2002 à 22:27, Jesper Krogh a écrit :
> > I really think this is a bug:
> > [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86
> > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed
> > (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 12:02 schrieb Ben Reser:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > To bind to a port less than 1024 you need root privileges. All
> > mailports are less than 1024. so initialy you need root privileges.
> > OK, you can drop it once you ha
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44556
The above bug report seems to suggest that the KDE developers think this is
fixed, but it is sill there in RC5 using the Mandrake RPMs in Cooker.
Anyone know if this is just in the Mandrake packaged edition?
--
John Allen, Emai
> "valéry" == Valéry Raulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
valéry> Is it possible to put kernel serial driver (Standard/generic serial
valéry> support) as module ?
valéry> On some computer, it is needed to have serial as module since irda
valéry> drivers has to be loaded before serial one. e.g,
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-11 12:30
---
I just tried and cannot reproduce the problem:
tmp> g++ -Wall -o TraceMatriceDebug TraceMatriceDebug.cc
tmp> g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2-4mdk)
C
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-11 12:25
---
Created an attachment (id=51)
--> (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=51&action=view)
Source from original report with fixed line-wrapping
Since the line-w
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> No, postfix can't lose mail (at least in theory). postfix don't confirms
> the receiving of the mail until it is succesfully written to the spool
> directory. So you can loose mail if you use write caches in your system
> (OS o
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> To bind to a port less than 1024 you need root privileges. All mailports
> are less than 1024. so initialy you need root privileges. OK, you can drop
> it once you have bind to port 25 and change to a less privileged user. but
Le mar 10/12/2002 à 22:27, Jesper Krogh a écrit :
> I really think this is a bug:
>
> [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB):
> XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1-
> 3mdk drakcro
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 10:04 schrieb Ben Reser:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
> > not queueing mail means no mail written on a hard disk, wich means you
> > can loose mail with a machine crash..
>
> This package is no more vulnerable to losing mail because of a
Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:50PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:51:48PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
I'd argue that those people would bother to help triage your bugs
anyway. :)
wouldn't
Blah it was right the first time. Never mind me. :P
~passing B
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
> not queueing mail means no mail written on a hard disk, wich means you
> can loose mail with a machine crash..
This package is no more vulnerable to losing mail because of a machine
crash than postfix is. postfix can lose mail if the mach
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 02:30, Yves Duret wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> > So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
> > mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many more. An
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 09:30 schrieb Yves Duret:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> > So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
> > mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:46:31 +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>
>> Trying to investigate my gnome-panel freeze, I attached gdb to the
>> process, but after loading symbols from libs it segfaults...
>
> Loading from i686 libpthread. Pascal, you forgot to
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624
Product: gcc-c++
Component: program
Summary: Quand on essaie de compiler ce programme sous Mandrake
Linux 9.0, le compilateur avoue une erreur interne et
demande un rapport de bog
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Trying to investigate my gnome-panel freeze, I attached gdb to the
> process, but after loading symbols from libs it segfaults...
Loading from i686 libpthread. Pascal, you forgot to specify your laptop
system. ;-)
Anyway, should be fixed in -22mdk, ver
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
> mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many more. And
> postfix is known to be stable and secure.
freedom o
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:10:52AM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Han Boetes wrote on Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:30:42AM +0100 :
> > > --=-=-=
> > > Name: esmtp
73 matches
Mail list logo
