Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-29 Thread Peter Magnusson
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, andre wrote: On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote: I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel. highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other How much

Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-29 Thread Peter Magnusson
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne wrote: No, he wants all machines (including my P133/32MB box which just runs a firewall) to have the overhead of highmem, just so that weird issues ( I Fine, so install both kernels at install if the installer sees more than 1024 MB RAM. It will be more and

Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-29 Thread Peter Magnusson
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at Isnt highmem the only choice if i want to use 1024 MB RAM? I think it would be great if MDK could do a highmem kernel also, not just SMP + HIGHMEM kernel. btw. do you really

Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-29 Thread Peter Magnusson
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote: Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this without highmem: total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84 107520 -/+

[Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM

2002-10-22 Thread Peter Magnusson
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel. I tried this: [rootgauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...### [100%]