Le Mardi 21 Octobre 2003 20:42, Buchan Milne a écrit :
A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their tool).
Why, if a user makes a mistake, do they end
Le Mercredi 22 Octobre 2003 00:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Le Mardi 21 Octobre 2003 20:42, Buchan Milne a écrit :
A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used
Le Dimanche 19 Octobre 2003 00:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 11:43, Buchan Milne a écrit :
No significant advantage over CUPS (AFAIR).
So would you prefer cups for a printer not shared (for both security
and size reasons) ?
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 11:43, Buchan Milne a écrit :
stephlub wrote:
I just saw today that pdq was'nt in 9.1
Do you mean 9.2? I am sure pdq was in 9.1. Anyway, it's now in contrib
(AFAIK).
I'm afraid no, urpmq saw it only in contrib. :-/
I would like to know when and why it has been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 11:43, Buchan Milne a écrit :
No significant advantage over CUPS (AFAIR).
So would you prefer cups for a printer not shared (for both security and
size reasons) ?
I have no such printers ;-).
unlike many people (such as standalone
I just saw today that pdq was'nt in 9.1
I would like to know when and why it has been removed
is it a 'bad' package? lack of place? too difficult to maintain?
I just saw today that pdq was'nt in 9.1
I would like to know when and why it has been removed
is it a 'bad' package? lack of place? too difficult to maintain?
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 10:19, Warly a écrit :
It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
have some brainstorm.
May you give your opinion on :
in my opinion:
---
- What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
- We though a bit late in the 9.2
Le Lundi 29 Septembre 2003 15:11, Pierre Jarillon a écrit :
My proposition is to ask people if they want to help or some help or
nothing. - allow to query the database to find people living in the same
area. - create a mailing list for each area. Only club members of the same
area can access
I couldn't use CD2 and 3 of rc1 to update my beta2 unlike during beta
installation.
It seems not to be a hardware of CD error.
I don't kept errors but if you find this interesting I'll retry and transmit
it to you.
(sorry if this has already been reported)
selection of eggdrop make freeze runinstall2
If click is too fast when confirm add dependancies, the window remains and if
click again OK or cancel,drives to previous stage (quick selection)
Known, fixed, most over-reported bug for beta2.
sorry
Buchan
thanks
I 've no printer connected yet but tried to configure printer at end of
installation
tty7
An error occured
printer-utils rpm not found
tty1
...
cannot read printrc file!
tty3
...
selecting packages foomatic-db-engine foomatic-filters foomatic-db
printer-utils printer-testpages nmap scli
tty1
...
rpmdb :/var/lib/rpm/Triggername: No such file or directory
rpmdb :/var/lib/rpm/Triggername: cannot sync: No such file or directory
rpmdb :/var/lib/rpm/Triggername: No such file or directory
rpmdb :/var/lib/rpm/Triggername: cannot sync: No such file or directory
rpmdb
Le Vendredi 18 Juillet 2003 07:16, Warly a écrit :
stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried to build new cd from fresh update and it fails
I updated and tried this twice in case the download was wrong
$ i586/misc/MakeCD -t /tmp/ -a i586/
URPM object version 0.91 does not match
I tried to build new cd from fresh update and it fails
I updated and tried this twice in case the download was wrong
$ i586/misc/MakeCD -t /tmp/ -a i586/
URPM object version 0.91 does not match bootstrap parameter 0.90 at
Le Jeudi 19 Juin 2003 08:09, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: Stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:38 AM
Subject: [Cooker] skel.spec
Is this file reserved to MandrakeClub users?
https
Le Jeudi 19 Juin 2003 14:10, Han Boetes a écrit :
Stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this file reserved to MandrakeClub users?
https://people.mandrakesoft.com/~lenny/files/skel.spec
:-)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/rpms/skel.spec
# Han
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/$LANG
Le Lundi 23 Juin 2003 10:42, Warly a écrit :
stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
REJECTED master disc 1 unicon-3.0.3-12mdk.i586 (Missing dependencies:
libnewt.so.0.50)
MakeCD sent a lot of error messages but the iso are there
could you explain what's wrong here?
do I forgot something
Le Jeudi 19 Juin 2003 14:34, Buchan Milne a écrit :
Han Boetes wrote:
Stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/rpms/skel.spec
Doesn't someone want to add this to the mdk-rpm-howto in contrib? Why
should the documentation be packaged, telling you the incorrect
(please, have a look at the messageMissing dependencies when MakeCD that
could be the reason)
On update from 9.1:
Doesn't have asked me for other CD! same thing for 9.1(quick install, not
checked that) but for some debian CD are read
skipped stage of pakages install!
install XFree and al when
On update from 9.1:
REJECTED master disc 1 squidGuard-1.2.0-6mdk.i586 (Missing dependencies:
perl(LWP::Parallel::UserAgent))
REJECTED master disc 1 swatch-3.0.4-2mdk.noarch (Missing dependencies:
perl(Bit::Vector))
REJECTED master disc 1 ucd-snmp-utils-4.2.3-6mdk.i586 (Missing dependencies:
(please, have a look at the messageMissing dependencies when MakeCD that
could be the reason)
on update from 9.1 (was in 9.1):
wheel mouse Arowana MSWH-03 www.arowanashop.com
3 buttons yes
*wheell no* (same thing for 9.1)
SetMouseSettings - type: 13 brate: 1200 srate:0
Is this file reserved to MandrakeClub users?
https://people.mandrakesoft.com/~lenny/files/skel.spec
:-)
25 matches
Mail list logo
