Thierry Vignaud wrote:
do you really get fs corruption as of october ?
No, I understand now, it reboots after the file checking. So it handles it nicely now.
Eric
Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2
It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.
Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.
Regards,
Buchan
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Galileo wrote:
dmo Does it still do that? I talked about this with Thierry a while ago and he
dmo promised me the journal is updated before the filesystem check (which is
dmo the best thing, journal update doesn't necessarily fix all errors).
dmo In 9.1 the journal was
i am having this exact problem, the init-script run fsck, and not the default
kernel does not boot.
the important lines say:
mounting root filesystem on ide0(3,8)
mount error 22 mounting ext3 defaults
ext3 no journal on filesystem on ide0(3,8)
using a self compiled 2.6 kernel (with ext3 built
dmo Does it still do that? I talked about this with Thierry a while ago and he
dmo promised me the journal is updated before the filesystem check (which is
dmo the best thing, journal update doesn't necessarily fix all errors).
dmo In 9.1 the journal was certainly not updated before fs check.
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT
use the journal and then you will experience system
Eric Fernandez wrote:
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT
use the journal and then you
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Eric Fernandez wrote:
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT
use the
Buchan Milne wrote:
Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2
It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.
Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.
Regards,
Buchan
I am sure it still does it
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:12:50 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
Eric Fernandez wrote:
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
Le ven 31/10/2003 à 16:04, Eric Fernandez a écrit :
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not
shut down cleanly, and a message appear :
Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check
Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT
Buchan Milne wrote:
Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2
It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.
Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.
Regards,
Buchan
Yep, I definitely confirm on a
Eric Fernandez wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2
It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2.
Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested
quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed.
I am sure it still
FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
I suffer from this too. But normally this has been corrected. If you
launch filesystem check, the system should reboot automatically after.
OK, actually since I got a disaster with it, I did not dare doing it
again. I can check on the experimental 9.2 computer I have.
FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
I suffer from this too. But normally this has been corrected. If you
launch filesystem check, the system should reboot automatically after.
There are two interpretations for misleading here.
The original complaint was that the message gave the impression you had
to
15 matches
Mail list logo
