https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-09 12:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=167)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=167action=view)
Sorted list of installed RPMs on machine 1
A list of installed
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-09 12:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=168)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=168action=view)
Sorted list of installed RPMs on machine 2
A list of the RPM's that
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-09 13:07 ---
Where did you get this mozilla rpm from? It's not part of current cooker, or part of
9.0
afaik. It seems to break on Xft, but I'm not sure.
If you got this rpm from
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-09 13:13 ---
It's in the list of possible Mozilla versions here, so I figured this was the best
place to file a bug-report?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-09 13:28 ---
No, sorry.
Version 1.1 was included with 9.0 and should just work.
Mozilla taken from cooker, or from a previous cooker, like 1.2 will use
fontconfig/xft,
which