Bruno Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was my first guess as well, but the system still wouldn't
> come up after I built my own initrd with raid1 and raid5 support.
> I added aliases for md-personality-3 and md-personality-4 to
> /etc/modules.conf, but no luck. Every array would still fai
Bruno Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> down. Or at least, this is my interpretation of why every time I
> upgrade my root-RAID Mandrake-based server, I have to remember to
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/errata.php3#raid
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Bruno Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> One thought. Was yours a completely fresh install? Mine was an install over
> the top of 9.0 RC1, and I was trying in the first instance to retain the old
> arrays. The errata indicates that this is what goes wrong - diskdrake
> identifies the old
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 05:46, Bruno Prior wrote:
> This was my first guess as well, but the system still wouldn't come up
> after I built my own initrd with raid1 and raid5 support. I added
> aliases for md-personality-3 and md-personality-4 to /etc/modules.conf,
> but no luck. Every array would
That's not very helpful if the damn thing won't come up even in single
user mode. ;) I could use the rescue mode from the CD, but I'd rather
everything work right w/o having to do that.
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 04:15, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> From: "Wes Kurdziolek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Sun, 20
Wes Kurdziolek wrote:
>
> When I did an MDK 9.0 install that resembled this (ext3 /boot, RAID-0 /,
> /usr, /usr/local, /var/, and /tmp -- yes, performance is critical), the
> system failed to come up after rebooting b/c the raid0 module was not
> included in the initrd and/or not loaded by the in
Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Funny, I have no problem what so ever with the soft raid, and I have 3
> systems
> set up this way, 2 with scsi disks, and one with ide disks...
>
> my setup: RAID -1
>
> /dev/md0 -> /boot (sda1,sdb1 or hda1,hdc1)
> /dev/md1 -> / (sda6,sdb6 or hda6,hdc6
From: "Wes Kurdziolek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:43, Bruno Prior wrote:
> > > Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP
and
> > > two 40G
> > > 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
> > > onboard promise controller.
>
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:43, Bruno Prior wrote:
> > Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
> > two 40G
> > 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
> > onboard promise controller.
> >
> > Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as f
> From: "Bruno Prior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP
and
> > > two 40G
> > > 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
> > > onboard promise controller.
> > >
> > > Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned
> Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
> two 40G
> 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
> onboard promise controller.
>
> Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
>
> /dev/hda1256M-/boot [ext2]
> /dev
> Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
> two 40G
> 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
> onboard promise controller.
>
> Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
>
> /dev/hda1256M-/boot [ext2]
> /dev/hda
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 12:32 PM, Stephen Pickering wrote:
>> Before 9.0, detecting current RAID was not supported so it was
>> not so good. Now it's even better, yep.
>>
> Any tips on how to install using raid ?
>
> I tried this morning with no sucess, so I went back to non raid.
H
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Linux Autrement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>done folks at Mandrake. But why is it not shouted load and clear that
>>Mandrake since at least 8.2 can install straight onto a RAID?
>>
>>
>
>Before 9.0, detecting current RAID was not supported so it was
14 matches
Mail list logo