On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:45, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Anyone have a mirror? the site is dead.
Why the hell would you want it?
Ben's script is Mandrake-specific and available from PLF.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:36:57AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
Why the hell would you want it?
Ben's script is Mandrake-specific and available from PLF.
Actually it isn't in PLF. At least not to my knowledge and it's not in
the 9.0 tree on club-internet.fr's mirror. Besides my site as far as I
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 04:36 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:45, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Anyone have a mirror? the site is dead.
Why the hell would you want it?
To see if Microsoft lets it pass. If it remains unmolested for, say, a year,
then that's a precedent. If
You're right. My bad.
Austin
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 04:30, Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:36:57AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
Why the hell would you want it?
Ben's script is Mandrake-specific and available from PLF.
Actually it isn't in PLF. At least not to my knowledge and
Didn't last long:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/msfonts/download/
There's a new mirror to those, just
check the link again.
Oh, and i've made them available thru eDonkey network. If you care to
get them, here are the links:
ed2k://|file|msfonts.spec|3053|0d24fd8b645f38438d79cb13f966a2fa|/
Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
~snip~
Didn't last long:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/msfonts/download/
well, since when you buy a computer you invariably get windows [
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J. Greenlees a écrit:
|
|
| Ben Reser wrote:
|
| On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
|
| PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
|
| ~snip~
|
| Didn't last long:
|
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:22:34PM -0800, J. Greenlees wrote:
Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
~snip~
Didn't last long:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/msfonts/download/
Murray J. Root wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:22:34PM -0800, J. Greenlees wrote:
Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
~snip~
Didn't last long:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:45:34PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Didn't last long:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/msfonts/download/
Anyone have a mirror? the site is dead.
His RPMS are a violation of the license agreement that Microsoft
released them under. So I seriously doubt anybody
what fonts do you want? like tahoma, ariel, that sort of thing?
Quoting Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:45:34PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Didn't last long:
http://avi.alkalay.net/software/msfonts/download/
Anyone have a mirror? the site is dead.
His RPMS
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 04:06 pm, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 11:03 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better understand the situation. Some guy has gone and
]
11.12.2002 19:06
Please respond to cooker
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Cooker] MS Fonts in a bag
Austin Acton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better understand the situation. Some guy has gone and made
a REAL rpm of all
Austin Acton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM,
here is a way to better understand the situation.
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 11:03 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better understand the situation. Some guy has gone and made
a REAL rpm of all the MS fonts, including Tahoma and
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:20:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed MS fonts by using Ben's bootstrap RPM.
For some reason I could not get these fonts to appear in the font
selection of gnome terminal. (This is just a one example)
Does anybody have an idea what is getting
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:06:45PM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
Hmmm I tried Bens rpm, which didn't work somehow. Then I remembered this
project:
http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/
Which had a spec-file which looked surprisingly familiar with the slight
difference that it worked fine. So
I haven't tried it. His site is SERIOUSLY freshmeated. hehe
I'm sure Ben's is better because it's Mandrake specific, but it will be
very interesting to see if this new rpm lasts. Maybe we will gain some
insight on MS's true feelings on the subject.
All I have to say is that guy is
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
PLEASE let's not start the should we/shouldn't we debate again.
I just thought this was interesting. Since there was some worry going
on about the legalities and ethics of Ben's MS font bootstrap RPM, here
is a way to better
All I have to say is that guy is asking for it...
What is the worse that can happen? a cease and desist?
;oP
Damian
22 matches
Mail list logo
