Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:31, Digital Wokan wrote: Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a business point of view (and let's face it, we all want to be paid for our work, no matter what that work is). Of course, adding PLF to the list of software install sites for URPMI during the use

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote: I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it isn't under an incompatible license. Because of appearances. It's in some sense linked to

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-21 Thread Buchan Milne
On 21 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote: I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it isn't under an incompatible license. Because of

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-21 Thread David Walser
see bottom --- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote: I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:20, Levi Ramsey wrote: This thread from one of the Debian ML's is the classic in this subject: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200203/msg00829.html They seem to have been discussing a package which actually had some use, though. My argument

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 19 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote: [Contrib-RPM] Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) [snip] Description : Hot-babe is a small graphical utility which display the system activity in a very

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 09:46, Guy.Bormann wrote: Is it true after all what they say about British men? :-))) *jumping in my flamesuit* Huh? What's that? That we enjoy marmite? That we discuss the weather a lot? That we're not terribly good at cricket? -- adamw

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Digital Wokan
Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a business point of view (and let's face it, we all want to be paid for our work, no matter what that work is). Of course, adding PLF to the list of software install sites for URPMI during the use of RPMDrake or whatever the GUI version of the software

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Digital Wokan
I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it isn't under an incompatible license. On Thursday 19 September 2002 20:31, Digital Wokan wrote: Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Thu Sep 19 21:00 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Hot-babe is a small graphical utility which display the system activity in a very special way. When the CPU is idle, it displays a dressed girl, and when the activity goes up, as the temperature increases, the girl begins to undress, to

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Sep 20

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 21:31, Adam Williamson a écrit : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread David Dreggors
I personally think the last remark about porn was WAY too harsh. This may not be what every person wants running on thier desktop but it is definitely NOT porn either. I downloaded it just for the comical effect and to have somethig else M$ doesn't have. I may only check it out once or I may keep

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread rcc
On 19 Sep 2002 17:03:18 -0400 David Dreggors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally think the last remark about porn was WAY too harsh. This may not be what every person wants running on thier desktop but it is definitely NOT porn either. I downloaded it just for the comical effect and to

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote: I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor. It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you only had a look at homepage ? Anyway, it has already been wiped out from contribs, and

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Jason Straight
Finally a utility that has some usefullnes and isn't a total waste of Hard drive space like such utils as GCC, KDE, gkrellm, etc... :) Thanks Guillaume - now I'm going to have to write a program that does a while(1) for a few mins and put it in my crontab. hehe On Thursday 19 September 2002

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Digital Wokan
While this may not get my grandmother to use Linux, I'll bet it might convince my brother and a couple more friends at work. :) Guillaume Rousse wrote, On 9/19/2002 3:00 PM: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.1.0

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Digital Wokan
Adam Williamson wrote, On 9/19/2002 5:27 PM: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote: I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor. It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you only had a look at homepage ? Anyway, it

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Philippe Coulonges
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 23:27, Adam Williamson a écrit : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote: I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor. It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you only had a look at homepage ?

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Nelson Bartley
LOL! Well Said. Whoever said that package had to leave CONTRIBS shoulda have been shot (But grats to Guillaume for reacting so quickly). Contribs is there for a reason. It's not part of the standard distribution, and god forbid, should you install all 4.7 GB of OS w/ ALL the contribs you might

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Leon Brooks
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 05:23, rcc wrote: On 19 Sep 2002 17:03:18 -0400 there's more (real) skin to be seen in advertising and newspaper booths around here. I would have thought paper was a more appropriate medium _and_ far easier to obtain. (-: Cheers; Leon

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Leon Brooks
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:44, Digital Wokan wrote: While this may not get my grandmother to use Linux, I'll bet it might convince my brother and a couple more friends at work. :) No worries. Grab the RPMS from the main distro, add hot-babe and anything else you like from PLF, and roll your own

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Olivier Thauvin
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 23:02, Nelson Bartley a écrit : LOL! Well Said. Whoever said that package had to leave CONTRIBS shoulda have been shot (But grats to Guillaume for reacting so quickly). Contribs is there for a reason. It's not part of the standard distribution, and god forbid,

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-19 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Fri Sep 20 0:45 +0200, Philippe Coulonges wrote: I'm happy with that, your honor. Could you please also remove bugsquish which hurts my animist religious conceptions, bzflag as proning military violence is certainly more questionable than any drawn young female, defenguin and xbill that