Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-30 Thread Claudio
Claudio wrote: Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the fixed kernel (and the correct kde packages and so on...).

[Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Claudio
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the fixed kernel (and the correct kde packages and so on...). What do you think about

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Eric Fernandez
Claudio wrote: Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the fixed kernel (and the correct kde packages and so on...). What

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Fernandez wrote: Claudio wrote: Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar,

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread John Allen
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 4:02 pm, Eric Fernandez wrote: Claudio wrote: Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Eric Fernandez
John Allen wrote: WTH does that mean How can a public ftp server contain leaked version of Mandrake 9.2? I correct myself : leaked bittorrent links (available to non-members). Eric

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Diego Iastrubni
does it mean then there will be newer ISO's or not? some people want MDK9.2 and I will be more then happy to give them the fixed public ISO's. , 29 2003, 19:10,Eric Fernandez: John Allen wrote: WTH does that mean How can a public ftp server contain leaked version of Mandrake 9.2? I

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread John Allen
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 5:10 pm, Eric Fernandez wrote: John Allen wrote: WTH does that mean How can a public ftp server contain leaked version of Mandrake 9.2? I correct myself : leaked bittorrent links (available to non-members). Well bitttorrent has nothing to do with it; the

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2003 18:32 schrieb Diego Iastrubni: does it mean then there will be newer ISO's or not? some people want MDK9.2 and I will be more then happy to give them the fixed public ISO's. If you would read the errata page, you would see that new ISOs and CDs are in the work.

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion: move 9.2 to 9.2b or 9.2.1 and CHANGE the kernel!

2003-10-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 16:02, Eric Fernandez wrote: Claudio wrote: Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) Since many of us are having BIG problem with the 9.2 tree on the mirror (expecially for the LG-bug), imho it would be safe to REMOVE the actual 9.2 and upload a new 9.2b or similar, with the fixed