Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003, 12:17:04 Uhr MET, schrieb Glenn Burkhardt:
> I also notice that the link to the stable version bug database is
> incorrect; it should be http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
> (see screen shot, attached).
Arrgh, could you please avoid attachments on this list? Some people u
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003, 10:47:49 Uhr MET, schrieb Glenn Burkhardt:
How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list
of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to
submit a bug for the xfig package.
You're right, the p
Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003, 10:47:49 Uhr MET, schrieb Glenn Burkhardt:
> How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list
> of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to
> submit a bug for the xfig package.
You're right, the package list is currentl
How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list
of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to
submit a bug for the xfig package.
Thanks.
this bug
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4960
has no status (neither invalid, nor resolved or anything else) - is that
correct? or is this a new way of bug extinction :-)
happy hacking
udo
--
"Well, if we were to build it idiot proof,
someone would build a better idiot."
Warly wrote:
> Lea Gris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe if mod_gzip was onabled on qa.mandrakesoft.com this would make
> > page loading much faster and less bandwidth hungry.
>
> mod_gzip is not yet ported to apache2
Besides, it's more the query time (on the server side) and the rendering
ti
when viewing my buglist from the bugzilla main page, I get an internal
server error ...
the URL causing it is:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=udo%40vibe.ac&emailtype1=exact&emailassi
onsdagen den 22 oktober 2003 22.30 skrev Warly:
> Lea Gris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > | Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > |>I have merge the bugzilla CVS into qa.mandrakesoft.com.
> > |>
> > |>Warn for any
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:30:36PM +0200, Warly wrote:
Lea Gris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe if mod_gzip was onabled on qa.mandrakesoft.com this would make
page loading much faster and less bandwidth hungry.
mod_gzip is not yet ported to apache2
what about mod_deflate (which is in main)?
L.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warly wrote:
|>| i love you morpheous !
|>
|>Maybe if mod_gzip was onabled on qa.mandrakesoft.com this would make
|>page loading much faster and less bandwidth hungry.
|
|
| mod_gzip is not yet ported to apache2
It as been already replaced by output mo
Lea Gris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> | Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> |
> |>I have merge the bugzilla CVS into qa.mandrakesoft.com.
> |>
> |>Warn for any error.
> |>
> |>Moreover I have try to make it a bit fas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
| Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
|>I have merge the bugzilla CVS into qa.mandrakesoft.com.
|>
|>Warn for any error.
|>
|>Moreover I have try to make it a bit faster, shortcircuiting a very
|>slow function and removing the p
Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have merge the bugzilla CVS into qa.mandrakesoft.com.
>
> Warn for any error.
>
> Moreover I have try to make it a bit faster, shortcircuiting a very
> slow function and removing the product choice from the bug edition
> pages (this decrease the page size fr
I have merge the bugzilla CVS into qa.mandrakesoft.com.
Warn for any error.
Moreover I have try to make it a bit faster, shortcircuiting a very
slow function and removing the product choice from the bug edition
pages (this decrease the page size from 400 KB to about 50 KB)
--
Warly
It seems bugzilla accounts are identified by email address. This is a
bit of a problem, as mine is still registered as [EMAIL PROTECTED] , an
address that no longer works. I looked for a "change address" option but
couldn't see one, and it'd be nice to keep my account instead of opening
a new one f
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:47 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > Yep that is what i get since weeks now, but nobody seems to have
> > recognized that yet.
>
> I haven't had problems before, and this one just went through ...
Well i had a quick try remembering that the webservers have moved
recently.
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:45 schrieb Michael Scherer:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2003 14:38, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/&short_desc=Zenity%20emulation%20of%20
> > >gd ia log%20is%20broken...&keywords=&for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
>
>>Götz Waschk wrote:
>>
>>>Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
>>>
>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
fixed :)
>>>
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Götz Waschk wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> >>>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
> >>
> >>fixed :)
> >
> > It's not fixed for me:
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 14:38, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Götz Waschk wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> > >>>Gettting forbidden error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
>
>>>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
>>
>>fixed :)
>
> It's not fixed for me:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
>
It's not possible to
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> > Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
> fixed :)
It's not fixed for me:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
--
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the
homeless, whether the mad destruc
"MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
fixed :)
--
Warly
> Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
>
> Cory Meisch
> CPEA Test Technician
> HP deskjet linux team member
> Hewlett-Packard Vancouver
> (360) 212-7009
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think that's strange then check out http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/wiki/
"This page is temporarily closed in prote
I added comments for a one bug in the bugzilla but I did not see
any mail in the cooker for that bug.
Does anybody know is this intentional or is there something wrong in the
bugzilla. (Is cooker removed from the cc-targets where bugs are send)
Mika
Hi!
I tried to post a new bug to bugzilla But I did not come trough. What I get
is:
-
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /dvb below dvb-ttpci alps_bsrv2 alps_tdmb7
alps_tdlb7 add below dvb-ttpci grundig_29504-401 grundig_29504-491
Pixel wrote:
> "[hamster]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Need to change the wording of the message to "Please press Next to
continue"
>
> fixed in CVS
>
> @resolution=fixed
I'm not sure, but it appears that this kind of message doesn't make it to
Bugzilla. I've occasionally noticed that e-mai
Is BugZilla down? I can't connect to qa.mandrakesoft.com but I can ping it.
"John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pixel wrote:
> > "[hamster]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Need to change the wording of the message to "Please press Next to
> continue"
> >
> > fixed in CVS
> >
> > @resolution=fixed
>
>
> I'm not sure, but it appears that this kind of messag
Warly wrote:
> I restart mysql and it works again.
>
> Some kind of heat side-effect, likely...
I think I can identify with the machine... Though now it doesn't respond on
http?
- John
John Keller wrote:
> I'm not sure, but it appears that this kind of message doesn't make it to
> Bugzilla. I've occasionally noticed that e-mail commands aren't reflected
in
> the Bugzilla status, leading to "dangling" open reports.
(replying to self...)
I can confirm that the same thing also occ
Pixel wrote:
> warly will fix it, hopefully :)
Cool.
In this case, sorry for my soon-to-arrive other message. I was fervently
typing it when your reply came in.
3:00 AM + 28 degrees = unclear thinking...
- John
Warly wrote:
Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This morning, I bring up Bugzilla's main page, log in, select "Enter
New Bug", and get an Internal Server Error. Got the same bug trying
to get to New Bug from other pages as well. Error occurred at about
09:17 AM EST (GMT - 5:00).
I
Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This morning, I bring up Bugzilla's main page, log in, select "Enter
> New Bug", and get an Internal Server Error. Got the same bug trying
> to get to New Bug from other pages as well. Error occurred at about
> 09:17 AM EST (GMT - 5:00).
I had several
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Pixel wrote:
>> > "[hamster]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > Need to change the wording of the message to "Please press Next to
>> continue"
>> >
>> > fixed in CVS
>> >
>> > @resolution=fixed
>>
>>
>> I'm
Same here...
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Griffin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:20 AM
> To: Mandrake Cooker
> Subject: [Cooker] Bugzilla New Bug error today
>
>
> This morning, I bring up Bugzilla's main page, log in
This morning, I bring up Bugzilla's main page, log in, select "Enter New
Bug", and get an Internal Server Error. Got the same bug trying to get
to New Bug from other pages as well. Error occurred at about 09:17 AM
EST (GMT - 5:00).
HI !
I have tried to post a bug to bugzilla, but it was down the whole day. Is it
possible that there is done some work on it again (Its weekend again;)) or is
it just not reachable from here ?
Greets
Steffen
This is in regards to the broken KDE Help indexing tool in the KDE
Control Center. Bugzilla says that this was resolved in CVS by KDE
however I've just gotten the texstar KDE update to 3.1.2 and it is still
broken. Anyone know what is up with this? I'm *really* looking forward
to the possibl
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 11:48 schrieb Warly:
> Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> How one should vote for bugs ?
> >
> > Ah, damn, something more screwed up by the update. I will put it back.
>
> OK should be back again.
Yep thanks :)) Its ther
Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> How one should vote for bugs ?
>
> Ah, damn, something more screwed up by the update. I will put it back.
OK should be back again.
--
Warly
Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How one should vote for bugs ?
Ah, damn, something more screwed up by the update. I will put it back.
--
Warly
How one should vote for bugs ?
Yes, it's nice to be getting all of these bugzilla reminders. I'd love to
check if my bug is still valid, but I can't run the new kernel. Panic, panic,
panic.
BTW, is the new alsa in it? 0.9.2 is outdated now.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic O
Hi !
I have looked at some bugs in bugzilla and hace recognized that i have no link
"Vote for this bug". Is this something related to my account or a general
bugzilla issue ? Other have the same problem ? Further it would be nice to
have a reference of keywords one is able to use, so I could vo
On Tue 2003-06-03 at 15:33:35 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If serious bug-fixing is going to be done in the near future, we're
> > going to need a working bugzilla ...
> >
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&d
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If serious bug-fixing is going to be done in the near future, we're
> going to need a working bugzilla ...
>
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=NEEDINFO%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If serious bug-fixing is going to be done in the near future, we're
going to need a working bugzilla ...
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=NEEDINFO%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNCON
Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this query on bugzilla
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/reports.cgi?product=mozilla&output=most_recently_doomed&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=NEEDINFO%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNCONFIRMED%3A&links=1&banner=1
>
>
> leads to an sql error :)
this query on bugzilla
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/reports.cgi?product=mozilla&output=most_recently_doomed&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=NEEDINFO%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNCONFIRMED%3A&links=1&banner=1
leads to an sql error :)
Content-type: text/html
Software error:
Lots of people have run into this problem...Warly, is this something
that can be addressed in Bugzilla or is it hopeless? You can address
this after the release, I'm sure you're busy now.
bunnadik wrote:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAI
On Tue 2003-03-11 at 12:37:23 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Le Mardi 11 Mars 2003 12:32, Warly a écrit :
> > Jure Repinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > When I try to change my votes in bugzilla I get an error like this:
> > >
> > > Software error:
> > >
> > > SELECT fieldid FROM fielddefs WH
Le Mardi 11 Mars 2003 12:32, Warly a écrit :
> Jure Repinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I try to change my votes in bugzilla I get an error like this:
> >
> > Software error:
> >
> > SELECT fieldid FROM fielddefs WHERE name = 'bug_status': Table
> > 'fielddefs' was not locked with LOCK TABL
Jure Repinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to change my votes in bugzilla I get an error like this:
>
> Software error:
>
> SELECT fieldid FROM fielddefs WHERE name = 'bug_status': Table 'fielddefs'
> was not locked with LOCK TABLES at globals.pl line 252.
>
> For help, please send mail
Sascha Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:52, Quel Qun wrote:
>> Could the default query please include search in the unconfirmed defects
>> by default?
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> _ _ _ _
>>
>> | |_| | |_/ |
>> |
>> | / / -_) | / / |
>> |_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglob
When I try to change my votes in bugzilla I get an error like this:
Software error:
SELECT fieldid FROM fielddefs WHERE name = 'bug_status': Table 'fielddefs'
was not locked with LOCK TABLES at globals.pl line 252.
For help, please send mail to the webmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), giving this
er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:52, Quel Qun wrote:
> Could the default query please include search in the unconfirmed defects
> by default?
> Thanks,
> --
> _ _ _ _
>
> | |_| | |_/ |
> |
> | / / -_) | / / |
> |_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglobal.net
Could the default query please include search in the unconfirmed defects
by default?
Thanks,
--
_ _ _ _
| |_| | |_/ |
| / / -_) | / / |
|_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglobal.net
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 09:37, Warly wrote:
> New machine, one more CPU, some more RAM, fully dedicated to bugzilla,
> and available on non-encrypted port 80.
>
> Hope it will help.
Much, much faster.
Thank you.
--
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
"Thomas Backlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Page: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/request.cgi
>
> gives: Internal Server Error
fixed
--
Warly
Page: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/request.cgi
gives: Internal Server Error
Thomas
Le mer 26/02/2003 à 11:54, Warly a écrit :
> >> New machine, one more CPU, some more RAM, fully dedicated to bugzilla,
> >> and available on non-encrypted port 80.
> > YES! =) Next time I come to Paris, I'll buy you some beer ;-)
> > One thing though:
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/mainstat.cgi
> >
Jean-Michel Dault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mar 25/02/2003 à 13:37, Warly a écrit :
>> New machine, one more CPU, some more RAM, fully dedicated to bugzilla,
>> and available on non-encrypted port 80.
>> Hope it will help.
>
> YES! =) Next time I come to Paris, I'll buy you some beer ;-)
>
Le mar 25/02/2003 à 13:37, Warly a écrit :
> New machine, one more CPU, some more RAM, fully dedicated to bugzilla,
> and available on non-encrypted port 80.
> Hope it will help.
YES! =) Next time I come to Paris, I'll buy you some beer ;-)
One thing though:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/mainstat.cg
Warly,
Still looking for a secure connection.
V.
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.
Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.
Hint: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/O
New machine, one more CPU, some more RAM, fully dedicated to bugzilla,
and available on non-encrypted port 80.
Hope it will help.
--
Warly
I am in the process of migrating it on a new machine.
Sorry for the inconvenience
--
Warly
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can you add someone to the CC list of a bug
> through the mail interface?
You cannot at present, I will have to do it.
--
Warly
How can you add someone to the CC list of a bug
through the mail interface?
--- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Available commands for mail sent to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
--
>
> For these commands, just send a mail to
> [EM
On 20. feb 2003 12:55, Warly wrote:
> >> >> > The thought I had was to have the default page after login be My Bugs
> >> >> > rather than the search page. This alone should cut down tremendously on
> >> >> > the "load" on the server. Don't have bugzilla in front of me but the
> >> >> > link shou
Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18. feb 2003 17:09, Warly wrote:
>
>> Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On 18. feb 2003 09:18, Warly wrote:
>> >
>> >> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > The thought I had was to have the default page after lo
On 18. feb 2003 17:09, Warly wrote:
> Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 18. feb 2003 09:18, Warly wrote:
> >
> >> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > The thought I had was to have the default page after login be My Bugs
> >> > rather than the search page. T
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 08:09, Warly wrote:
> Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 18. feb 2003 09:18, Warly wrote:
> >
> >> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > The thought I had was to have the default page after login be My Bugs
> >> > rather than the search pag
Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18. feb 2003 09:18, Warly wrote:
>
>> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The thought I had was to have the default page after login be My Bugs
>> > rather than the search page. This alone should cut down tremendously on
>> > the "l
On 18. feb 2003 09:18, Warly wrote:
> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The thought I had was to have the default page after login be My Bugs
> > rather than the search page. This alone should cut down tremendously on
> > the "load" on the server. Don't have bugzilla in front o
James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 02:25, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
>> I had entered a bug for this :
>>
>> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449
>>
>> This can be "easily?" fixed by separating the product list from the page
>> itself
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 02:25, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
> I had entered a bug for this :
>
> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449
>
> This can be "easily?" fixed by separating the product list from the page
> itself: for example, putting the list into a separate file,
I had entered a bug for this :
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449
This can be "easily?" fixed by separating the product list from the page
itself: for example, putting the list into a separate file, so it is
recorded in the browser cache, and not reloaded every time.
Otherwise, t
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> How mature is vdanens "Anthill"? Could that relace bugzilla? Can bugzilla run
> under mod_perl?
I don't think anthill is very well suited for what we're doing... From
what I understand though YOS is using it for their bug tracking.
måndagen den 17 februari 2003 06.06 skrev Jean-Michel Dault:
> I always knew bugzilla was slow, but it gets worse every day, so I
> measured it:
>
> time -f "%E" lynx --dump https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/query.cgi>/dev/null
> 0:25.60
>
> 25 seconds to load the query page... that's awful.
>
> Compare
I always knew bugzilla was slow, but it gets worse every day, so I
measured it:
time -f "%E" lynx --dump https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/query.cgi>/dev/null
0:25.60
25 seconds to load the query page... that's awful.
Compare to some other mandrake web sites (https and http)
time -f "%E" lynx --dump
On Sunday 16 February 2003 22:00, Michael Reinsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mandrake's BugZilla is very slow, because some form-pages are very big
> as there are lots of packages. But most times, one already knows the
> package, so a very small HTML page with two forms is enough to first
> search for a keyw
meone else posting it, but it really speeds up filing bug reports :)
--
Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mr.uue.org
Title: Mandrake Cooker BugZilla Quick Access
Mandrake Cooke
Can we get the From field to be the person posting the message. At
least the name part of it if not the email addy? As it stands now the
>From field is the bug id which is already in the Subject. So this
creates some redundent information in my email index. It'd be nice to
easily scan down and
Available commands for mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
For these commands, just send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], any
line in the mail will be interpreted as a command.
canpostabug:
usage: canpostabug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are two annoying issues with bugzilla at the moment:
1. There are two entries for drakconf (drakconf & DrakConf). When one votes
for a bug that is listed under drakconf, then there is also a check-box for
the same bug under DrakConf.
2.(is pe
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 11:10, Warly wrote:
> fixed
Faster than light!
--
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
fixed
--
Warly
--
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:16, Steffen Barszus wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> I wonder how many votes a bug needs to get confirmed status, and how I can
>> influence a bug to be confirmed. I've reported some bugs some time ago and
>> the still are in status unconfirme
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:16, John Danielson, II wrote:
> Quel Qun wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:16, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi !
> >>
> >>I wonder how many votes a bug needs to get confirmed status, and how I can
> >>influence a bug to be confirmed. I've reported some bugs som
Quel Qun wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:16, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi !
I wonder how many votes a bug needs to get confirmed status, and how I can
influence a bug to be confirmed. I've reported some bugs some time ago and
the still are in status unconfirmed. As long as they are unconfirmed
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:16, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I wonder how many votes a bug needs to get confirmed status, and how I can
> influence a bug to be confirmed. I've reported some bugs some time ago and
> the still are in status unconfirmed. As long as they are unconfirmed they are
Hi !
I wonder how many votes a bug needs to get confirmed status, and how I can
influence a bug to be confirmed. I've reported some bugs some time ago and
the still are in status unconfirmed. As long as they are unconfirmed they are
ignored right ?
I'm namely interested in bugs 634-636. So if
Warly, sorry to complain about this amidst so many far more crucial
problems, but appreciate any help you can provide.
My Bugzilla login is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks and best wishes to all at Mandrake.
- George
Warly wrote:
George Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In regards to all th
George Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In regards to all the discussion on Bugzilla, I just attempted to post
> to Bugzilla and was refused on the login. I then attempted to create
> an account and was informed that I already have an account (which is
> probably true). I then attempted to
In regards to all the discussion on Bugzilla, I just attempted to post
to Bugzilla and was refused on the login. I then attempted to create an
account and was informed that I already have an account (which is
probably true). I then attempted to change my password and at that
point Bugzilla jus
On Friday 13 December 2002 14:31, andre wrote:
> There is a bigger problem. The bugzilla post are unreadable. They start
> with https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi? which says nothing to me
> except when i go to that webpage. Than there is optional some extra info.
> After that you get the ad
On Monday 09 December 2002 16:50, Warly wrote:
> I think there is 2 problems.
>
> - first one is technical, when you reply to the bug into cooker you
> get your comment posted both by sympa an bugzilla, this I can fix.
>
> - second one is maintainers and subscribers problems. Some of them do
> not
I tried to add some comments to bug 442. When I tried to commit the
comments I got an error:
Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and
send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details of what you were doing at
the time this message appeared.
URL: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo