Re: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ?

2002-10-31 Thread Guy McArthur
Does autofs work reliably with urpmi and removable media? It didn't for me in 8.2. I did urpmi.removemedia for the 8.2 discs, removed the cdrom mount point in fstab then urpmi.addmedia for each disc (/misc/cd), but it would still configure for /mnt/cdrom. I could only install packages by

RE: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ?

2002-10-29 Thread Robert Denier
You may want to check this but I think supermount -i disable will magically change fstab to get rid of supermount options. (Remember if you mess up fstab your machine may not boot.) Clearly you now have to mount everything by hand, but considering I use a cd at most every few days, it really

Re: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ?

2002-10-29 Thread Eric Fernandez
Robert Denier wrote: You may want to check this but I think supermount -i disable will magically change fstab to get rid of supermount options. (Remember if you mess up fstab your machine may not boot.) Clearly you now have to mount everything by hand, but considering I use a cd at most

Re: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ?

2002-10-29 Thread Alan Hughes
29, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ? Robert Denier wrote: You may want to check this but I think supermount -i disable will magically change fstab to get rid of supermount options. (Remember if you mess up fstab your machine may not boot

Re: [Cooker] supermount or alternate fs mounter ?

2002-10-29 Thread Eric Fernandez
Alan Hughes wrote: The problem is that AFAIK other auto mounters are user-space applications that work by periodically checking to see if a mount point is no longer used, and if so then unmounting it. Typically this check occurs at 30 second intervals (although I understand that most allow you