Re: [Cooker] urpmf bug
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:58, François Pons wrote: > Le mar 11/02/2003 à 17:12, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : > > > > > humm i reported this humm bug to libstdc++ but that's a feature to let > > > > you use perl regexp in file searching. Try to but backslash before the > > > > +. > > > > Probably, seeing two '+' next to each other could be a hint to > > disable perl regexp searching, francois WDYT? > > I was thinking exactly at this solution, this improve my volonté to code > it so. If you want an English translation - "willingness" would fit. -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] urpmf bug
Le mar 11/02/2003 à 17:12, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : > > > humm i reported this humm bug to libstdc++ but that's a feature to let > > > you use perl regexp in file searching. Try to but backslash before the > > > +. > > Probably, seeing two '+' next to each other could be a hint to > disable perl regexp searching, francois WDYT? I was thinking exactly at this solution, this improve my volonté to code it so. François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmf bug
BLINDAUER Emmanuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 23:57, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > > BLINDAUER Emmanuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Doing a "urpmf libstdc++.a", I got errors. > > > ++ makes trouble for urpmf. > > > I wonder why the standard unix option -- who say that there are no more > > > option isn't used. > > > Something has to be fixed :) > > > > humm i reported this humm bug to libstdc++ but that's a feature to let > > you use perl regexp in file searching. Try to but backslash before the > > +. Probably, seeing two '+' next to each other could be a hint to disable perl regexp searching, francois WDYT? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] urpmf bug
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 23:57, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > BLINDAUER Emmanuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Doing a "urpmf libstdc++.a", I got errors. > > ++ makes trouble for urpmf. > > I wonder why the standard unix option -- who say that there are no more > > option isn't used. > > Something has to be fixed :) > > humm i reported this humm bug to libstdc++ but that's a feature to let > you use perl regexp in file searching. Try to but backslash before the > +. Ok quoting and backslashing works. Emmanuel
Re: [Cooker] urpmf bug
BLINDAUER Emmanuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doing a "urpmf libstdc++.a", I got errors. > ++ makes trouble for urpmf. > I wonder why the standard unix option -- who say that there are no more option > isn't used. > Something has to be fixed :) humm i reported this humm bug to libstdc++ but that's a feature to let you use perl regexp in file searching. Try to but backslash before the +.
