[COOT] ligands

2011-09-21 Thread Mike
It looks like the new Coot no longer recognizes * for the sugar atoms in ATP, UDP, etc. Has anyone else had this problem?

Re: [COOT] ligands

2011-09-21 Thread Paul Emsley
On 21/09/11 16:10, Mike wrote: It looks like the new Coot no longer recognizes * for the sugar atoms in ATP, UDP, etc. That's right. Has anyone else had this problem? Yes. I think the solution for now is to run molprobity's remediator. A longer-term solution is for Coot - or a ccp4

Re: [COOT] Ligands

2010-03-21 Thread Yibin Lin
I don't know it. sorry.

[COOT] Ligands

2010-03-03 Thread Dean Derbyshire
Perhaps (most likely in fact) this has been asked and addressed in the past: is there (or will there be) a way in COOT to 'build' ligands from scratch? Currently I go through a long winded route of Sketcher... importing and pulling the coords around to fit electron density... then finally

Re: [COOT] Ligands

2010-03-03 Thread William G. Scott
If you can define a SMILES string for your ligand, you can get coot to build the ligand with the press of a button in a fraction of a second. If the SMILES syntax is a PITA, use this: http://www.molinspiration.com/cgi-bin/properties If you need more options, phenix.elbow also permits you to use

[COOT] ligands in alternate conformations

2009-04-16 Thread Judit Debreczeni
Hi, I'm wondering why adding alternate conformations to ligands (i.e. non amino acid residues) restricts the occupancy ratio to 50:50. I understand that ligands don't have rotamers (at least not ones that coot would know about) so I can't pick rotamers but I'd like to be able to specify the