Hello maintainers,
the Copr project is in the process of implementing the PULP storage
backend (RPM repo management technology):
https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/2533
We expect that this change will be slow and incremental (we will not move
all projects to PULP at once) and that
Hello,
tl;dr, we have just disabled Fedora 38 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 38 reached the end
of its life [4] and therefore we are disabling it in Copr.
That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible
to submit builds for the following
Hello Michael,
On čtvrtek 7. března 2024 16:31:14 CET Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Am Do., 7. März 2024 um 13:09 Uhr schrieb Pavel Raiskup :
> >
> > And the outage is over. Release notes here:
> >
> > https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2024-03-07.htm
2024 17:53:13 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> There will be a Fedora Copr outage starting at
>
> $ date --date '2024-03-07 11:30 UTC'
>
> The outage will last approximately 2 hours. The build queue processing will
> be stopped during the outage, and the Frontend/Web-UI will be down
/results/
Upstream ticket:
https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/3151
Infrastructure ticket:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11808
Please join Fedora Build System Matrix channel:
https://matrix.to/#/#buildsys:fedoraproject.org
Outage Contacts:
@praiskup (Pavel Raiskup) / @frostyx
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.5, the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs.
First and foremost, this update ships with updated
mock-core-configs v40.1, bringing Fedora 40 configs as "branched"
separately from Fedora Rawhide (Fedora 41 now equals to
On pátek 5. ledna 2024 10:06:34 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On čtvrtek 4. ledna 2024 19:20:46 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> > > BuildWit
On čtvrtek 4. ledna 2024 19:20:46 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> > BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> > gets d
On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> gets distributed to mirrors.
This has happened now. Fedora Copr builds F40
On pondělí 18. prosince 2023 10:08:06 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> > the configuration files for Mock, the chroo
On pondělí 18. prosince 2023 11:46:07 CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 18. 12. 23 10:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > In any case, if you need to - stay with DNF4 for a while - either do
> >
> > $ cat ~/.config/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg
> > include("/et
On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
> for building RPMs.
>
> The notable change in th
Hello maintainers!
Fedora 37 has been EOL for a few days now:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-all-tasks.html
So I have disabled the Fedora 37 chroots, which started the standard
build removal policy. For more info take a look at docs:
Hello maintainers!
You might have noticed that the Fedora Matrix <-> IRC bridge has been
inactive for quite some time and is unlikely to be restored soon.
Monitoring both channels has become expensive for our team.
I have personally noticed (as an IRC-only person until recently) that
Matrix has
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
for building RPMs.
The notable change in this release is that we are switching the default
package_manager from DNF4 to DNF5, according to the
Hello, just forwarding the message.
Thank you for the info Petr.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: broken building for rhel/epel on COPR today (RHEL release day)
Date: úterý 14. listopadu 2023, 11:04:33 CET
From: Petr Stodulka
Hi,
building on COPR will be broken today for
Hello Osama,
On pondělí 30. října 2023 18:44:39 CET Osama Albahrani wrote:
> I following
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/publish-rpm-on-copr/#_step_1_creating_the_package_using_tito
> and got the error below when running `tito build --rpm --test`. Any ideas
> what I might be
Thank you Steven for the report,
On sobota 16. září 2023 19:47:10 CEST Steven A. Falco wrote:
> For the last two days I've been seeing build errors like [1] and [2]:
>
> ERROR: Command failed:
> # mount -n -t tmpfs -o mode=0755 -o nr_inodes=0 -o size=140g
> mock_chroot_tmpfs
Hello again,
just a quick update that Mock 5.1 has been deployed into Fedora Copr,
too. While on it, openSUSE Leap 15.3 is now EOL and 15.5 added.
Happy building!
Pavel
On pátek 15. září 2023 14:05:19 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Let me announce a new releas
There will be an outage starting at
date --date "2023-08-16 12:30 UTC"
it will last approximately 2 hours. The build queue processing will be
stopped. During the outage time, we expect a very short downtime for the
DNF package storage (== copr-backend, download.copr.f.o, less than 10
On úterý 8. srpna 2023 19:12:36 CEST Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Fedora Linux 39 is going to be branched in the upcoming hours as per
> the previous discussion[1] we are going to disable new koji builds for
> the duration of this event.
>
> All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs).
This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
This effectively means that Mock
On středa 14. června 2023 12:37:24 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On čtvrtek 8. června 2023 17:42:13 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
> > might still be running F37 ATM, but
On čtvrtek 8. června 2023 17:42:13 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
> might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they
> work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is pa
not only for EL6... See
> > https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions
> > ...
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 toda
not only for EL6... See
> > https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions
> > ...
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 toda
entirely anyway
since it's long time EOL, but we still keep it for the distro upgrade
team(s)). This is up to the community to decide, let us know in our
issue tracker if you are concerned.
Pavel
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> > Hello maintainers!
> &
Hello maintainers!
Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they
work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is passing just fine, so
you _should_ be fine too :-). Please let us know if you have some
And here is the link to the release-notes, sorry for the delay:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2023-04-05.html
Happy building,
Pavel
On pondělí 3. dubna 2023 19:21:48 CEST Jiri Kyjovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There will be an outage starting at:
>
> $ date --date '2023-04-05
On pátek 3. března 2023 11:25:09 CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> we have recently migrated our packaging use case from the python-sig FAS group
> to python-packagers-sig.
>
> Is it possible, perhaps by adjusting the datat in the database, to
> migrate the copr @python group from python-sig to
On pátek 10. února 2023 11:38:25 CET Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:27 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:44, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Tomas,
> > > > thank you for the
Hello all,
our RAID storage got stuck this night (CET). Likely some deadlock caused by
high I/O - caused by the periodic "RAID check" process together with the Fedora
Rawhide => F38 branching task that has been done yesterday. But the actual
cause is unknown (if this looks familiar to you, let
Hi Ivan, thank you for your e-mail!
On úterý 29. listopadu 2022 23:33:11 CET Ivan Mironov wrote:
> For more than a day I am seeing following when trying to upload SRPM into
> copr.fedorainfracloud.org:
>
> Error 500: Unknown error
> Can not create storage directory for uploaded file:
aaand finally this long outage is over. This wasn't ideal, sorry for
any inconveniences. There were some PEBKAC problems while migrating the
storage to a new F37 instance, some signature problems (a few builds
failed because of sign error, please resubmit them) and some failed to
import
building!
Copr Team
On Friday, October 28, 2022 9:28:05 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> The outage just began. Copr is still running, but with a limitted quota.
> Please delay long builds and bigger rebuilds till Sunday evening.
>
> Have a nice weekend,
> Pavel
>
> On Friday, Oct
The outage just began. Copr is still running, but with a limitted quota.
Please delay long builds and bigger rebuilds till Sunday evening.
Have a nice weekend,
Pavel
On Friday, October 21, 2022 3:17:20 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> We need to replace the volume hosting our RPM/YUM repo d
On Monday, October 24, 2022 3:53:09 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 13:54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 23. 10. 22 v 5:55 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > The bug is after web page of results show the firsts results, the
> > > web
> > > page is cached and is never updated
On Monday, October 24, 2022 10:58:44 AM CEST Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> Pavel, would this help here?
> https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/1714 (SRPM build log should
> point at builder-live.log, not builder-live.log.gz)
I think that we are already mixing 3 "problems" into a single one
Hello Sérgio, thank you for the question!
On Sunday, October 23, 2022 5:55:05 AM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> The bug is simply to report, I found it some months ago it with help of
> FrostyX IIRC, after install my own corp build in a laptop .
is this a local-only behavior? I'm getting confused.
We need to replace the volume hosting our RPM/YUM repo data with a larger one.
As a consequence, we'll have to stop the build queue processing for about 20
hours, and we'll have two "full" (but short) outages (2x5 minutes) when the yum
repositories will be unavailable.
The anticipated start of
On Friday, October 21, 2022 11:48:43 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 09. 22 18:05, Jiri Kyjovsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Due to problems with free disk storage, Copr will be temporarily deleting
> > failed and outdated builds after 7 days instead of the default 14 days
> > until
> >
We plan to power-cycle one virtual machine in our infrastructure and boost
the computational power there. In thurn the build results (RPMs/metadata)
are going to be offline for a short period of time (up to 10 minutes).
More info on #fedora-buildsys irc channel (libera chat).
Links:
Bash built-in.
Pavel
>
> [1]: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/test.1.html
> [2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:35 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 1:35:30 AM CEST TommyLike Hu wrote:
> > &g
On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 1:35:30 AM CEST TommyLike Hu wrote:
> Sure, that would be easy to test this on an arm instance with script
> something like this:
> ```
>
> if [ -w $directory ] ; then echo 'Success!' ; fi
What path is held by the $directory / $REPODIR variables?
Pavel
P.S.
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 2:42:38 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi, Fedora 37 has been branched recently. We started the branching process:
> https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/how_to_manage_chroots.html#branching-process
>
> ATM we submitted a task for copying fedora-ra
Hi, Fedora 37 has been branched recently. We started the branching process:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/how_to_manage_chroots.html#branching-process
ATM we submitted a task for copying fedora-rawhide builds into fedora-37, this
should be finished in about 24 hours.
Currently, updates for
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 11:14:21 PM CEST Matthew Roth wrote:
> yes
Hello Matthew,
you can grant the requested permissions via web-UI or via copr cli:
$ copr edit-permissions --builder/--admin flug_m/duo_unix
Pavel
> > On Jul 28, 2022, at 4:08 PM, r...@copr-fe.aws.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
Copr failed to allocate VMs and assign VMs to the build task for several hours
now, which lead to many build failures. Please restart the builds if you were
affected. The issue is tracked here: https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/2066
Sorry for inconveniences.
Pavel
Hello maintainers!
Fedora 34 has been EOL for some time already:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
I disabled the Fedora 34 chroots now, which started the standard build
removal policy, for more info take a look at docs:
After more then a year, the teams who previously needed these chroots
already stopped using them. So the plan is to drop the oraclelinux*
chroots by the end of this month (July 2022). Please let us know if you
need more time.
Pavel
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 10:21:51 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup
The post- RHEL 9 GA time allowed us to move the epel-9-* chroots to the
official RHEL 9 + EPEL content (from previous CentOS Stream 9 + EPEL 9).
Should you have any problems with RHEL+EPEL 9, please report.
Just to recap, it means that EPEL 9 chroots use similar principles to
previously moved
Hello all,
Fedora infra folks recently racked for a new Power9 machine for Fedora
Copr, and we now finished the installation. The new machine is hosting
~30 production builder VMs). This machine is going to replace the two
older Power8 boxes.
To fixup some startup issues we had to provide a
Hello Steve,
On Saturday, May 14, 2022 5:08:05 PM CEST Steven A. Falco wrote:
> Over the last few days there seems to be a bottleneck on the PPC builders.
>
> For example, please see [1], [2], and [3]. The x86_64 builds all finished
> promptly, but the ppc64le builds are taking a very long
Hello.
We are pleased to announce that we deployed a new Fedora Copr release.
This time we added GSSAPI/Kerberos authentication support, we optimized
the backend side for the large task queues we face last months, and fixed
several bugs. More info:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 10:37:56 AM CET Jakub Kadlčík wrote:
> The outage is over now, everything should work as expected.
>
> For anyone interested, the release notes can be found here:
> https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2022-03-21.html
And just a small final update; we've just
On Friday, February 18, 2022 12:40:47 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Fedora 37 no longer has armhfp/armv7hl compose nor Koji repo.
>
> Could you please remove the Copr chroot?
>
> I've opened https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/867 for
> mock-core-configs.
Thanks for the info.
Fedora 36 enabled in Copr Production. Rawhide builds with fc37 already.
Happy building!
Pavel
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:49:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers, and release engineering!
>
> According to the F36 schedule [1], Fedora 36 is going to be branched from
Hello maintainers, and release engineering!
According to the F36 schedule [1], Fedora 36 is going to be branched from
Rawhide today.
So we started copying the Rawhide builds to Fedora 36 on Copr
right now [2]. I expect that everything will be finished no later than
tomorrow morning (2022-02-09
Finally! All the builders were moved to Fedora 35.
Test are passing on staging, so hopefully everything goes simiarly well in
production.
Happy building!
Pavell
On Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:50:18 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 5:16:31 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wr
On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 5:16:31 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers,
>
> seems like we are finally able to migrate to Fedora 35. If all the
> necessary test pass, we should be OK to migrate tomorrow, 2022-01-25.
We couldn't finish testing today. There are too
:32:37 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> just a quick update on this topic. This took a bit more time than I
> originally expected, but I was able to test that configuration.
>
> Please expect that step 2 happens on Monday, 2021-12-20 (I don't want to
> break thi
On Thursday, January 6, 2022 5:20:40 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Copr,
>
>
> just a quick question. When I build a package in Copr (the Fedora one) on
> x86_64, is the mock chroot located on a local filesystem, or a NFS?
Local, it is tmpfs.
Pavel
> Thanks,
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
>
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 12:42:40 PM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 09:01 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 1:03:51 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 22:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 1:03:51 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 22:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 10:35 +0100, Silvie Chlupova wrote:
> > > Hi Sérgio,
> > > I can reproduce your problem by deleting the database in the
> > > copr_database_1
Hi Sérgio,
On Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:58:32 PM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> now I have the all database of copr production but I want a clean
> Database and configure my builders ( which is only one x86_64 )
>
> I can't get rid of SQL: INSERT INTO dist_git_instance (name, clone_url,
>
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 2:41:41 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> It seems that copr.fedorainfracloud.org is down.
> I don't recall any planned outages.
It happened several times after migration to F35, sorry for complications.
I now realized that systemd-oomd does this, but httpd (some api
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 12:29:53 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> This though also gave us an opportunity to add EPEL 9 configs. Feel free
> to experiment with them. Note though Enterprise Linux 9 is not yet
> available - so the EPEL 9 chroots are currently built against CentOS
&
Hello maintainers, just heads-up (on breakage today, I hope).
To bring several config fixes (especially for the broken centos-stream chroots),
the mock-core-configs was updated today.
This though also gave us an opportunity to add EPEL 9 configs. Feel free
to experiment with them. Note though
On Friday, December 17, 2021 12:32:37 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> just a quick update on this topic. This took a bit more time than I
> originally expected, but I was able to test that configuration.
>
> Please expect that step 2 happens on Monday, 2021-1
, and we should be able to help you
next week with the migration on #fedora-buildsys, when needed.
Also, the step 3 will be delayed at least by 20 days, so you still have the
1-month transition period.
Sorry for inconvenience,
Pavel
On Friday, November 19, 2021 9:44:51 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote
Hello maintainers!
Fedora 33 has been EOL for two weeks already:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html
So I disabled the Fedora 33 chroots now, which started the standard build
removal policy, for more info take a look at docs:
Hello, just a quick update,
I was asked why ELN ppc64le isn't available in Copr - the reason probably
was that at the time we were adding other fedora-eln chroots we didn't have
ppc64le builders in hands... And when we re-enabled ppc64le builders, we
forgot about adding ELN chroot.
So I created
Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and this needs to be
discussed... so here we are.
By the end of the
Hello,
we are currently preparing Copr build system for migration to Fedora 35,
including the builder workers.
There's though, at least from the builder perspective, a major `rpkg-util`
behavior change [1] (removal of `auto_pack` feature) that many of the Copr
projects rely on. This is a bit
On Thursday, October 21, 2021 6:14:08 PM CEST John Boero wrote:
> Hi I've been a huge fan of COPR for years now but as projects and platforms
> grow I always wished there were a "Minimal" view along with "Simple" and
> "Detailed" where Minimal just shows the red/green/gray icon. Is there any
>
Hm, the options don't look invalid, so two-problems IMO:
- chmod looks to be buggy (when the process has the permissions to extract
the tarball, fixing permissions shouldn't be problem as on Linux
unprivileged user can not give the files away).
- rpmbuild should print-out the stderr output
Hello Fabian,
On Monday, September 27, 2021 3:36:18 PM CEST Fabian wrote:
> On Monday, September 27th, 2021 at 7:22 PM, Fabian
> wrote:
>
> > It's been a while since the last build, consider pushing a new
> > build to recent version.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> It turns out that shomehow
And the outage is over! Link to release notes is here:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2021-08-26.html
Happy building!
Pavel
On Monday, August 23, 2021 10:53:49 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> There will be an outage starting at:
>
> $ date --date '2021-08-26
There will be an outage starting at:
$ date --date '2021-08-26 7:30 UTC'
The outage will last approximately 2 hours. The copr-backend storage (copr build
results) will stay online during this outage.
Reason for outage:
We're updating copr packages to the new versions which will bring new
Hello,
I've just released the new mock-core-configs package:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/releases/tag/mock-core-configs-35-1
Updates are in Bodhi.
The new package ships Fedora 35 configuration; and since we seem to already
have the composes available - I deployed the new
Hello,
just a quick note - we enabled Oracle Linux chroots in Fedora Copr today,
this is temporarily needed by OAMG/LEAPP team for their CI/CD system.
Feel free to test those chroots, but please don't heavily depend on them
as we don't know when we'll again drop them (preferably use
On Friday, July 23, 2021 5:09:57 PM CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > The ppc64le doesn't seem to build on Power8 hardware we have [2], a
Hi all,
just for the info, we enabled the `centos-stream-9-x86_64` and
`centos-stream-9-aarch64` chroots in Fedora Copr. Note that we build
directly from composes [1] without mirrors (some failures can expected),
and that the packages are not GPG-signed. You have been warned :-)
The ppc64le
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 10:05:59 PM CEST harbottle wrote:
> I get redirected to Fedora accounts (id.fedoraproject.org), enter my username
> (harbottle) and password and click "Log in", thennothing. I can login
> directly to my Fedora account at
>
Hi all,
I'm glad I can announce that we have again (native) support for ppc64le builds
in Fedora Copr. Currently we have two Power8 boxes (in RDU):
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9059
The ppc64le chroots were re-enabled, feel free to use them. I noticed several
build failures
On Friday, July 9, 2021 11:36:09 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 07. 21 11:30, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Friday, July 9, 2021 10:19:57 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 09. 07. 21 9:46, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >>> This is pre-production experiment, rig
On Friday, July 9, 2021 10:19:57 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 07. 21 9:46, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > This is pre-production experiment, right? Couldn't you just specify
> > "Provides: python3dist(click) = 7.9"?
>
> It is, but it would not help me. By m
On Thursday, July 8, 2021 3:47:56 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Copr users and developers.
>
>
> When we update packages in Fedora, we regularly use Copr to test the impact
> of
> the upgrade.
>
> For me, the procedure usually goes like this:
>
> 1) create a new copr with Fedora
e already removed).
Pavel
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 9:28:37 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> And the outage is over!
>
> Release notes for the release are here:
> https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2021-06-16.html
>
> Happy building!
> Copr Team
>
On Friday, June 25, 2021 3:09:39 AM CEST r...@copr-fe.aws.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> Discord is proprietary, it shouldn't be in copr.
> Navigate to https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/admin/legal-flag/
Dear owner, I have to remove the proprietary software. Please see:
Thank you for the report!
On Monday, June 21, 2021 10:25:10 AM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> There's a repo [1] (owner in CC) that, during the last 2 days, is
> sending hundreds of builds of the same misconfigured package, taking
> resources and then failing with a timeout. Not sure what is triggering
And the outage is over!
Release notes for the release are here:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2021-06-16.html
Happy building!
Copr Team
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:44:28 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> There will be an outage starting at:
>
> $ date --date '2021-0
There will be an outage starting at:
$ date --date '2021-06-16 6:00 UTC'
The outage will last approximately 2 hours. The copr-backend storage (copr build
results) will stay online during this outage.
Reason for outage:
We're updating copr packages to the new versions which will bring new
Hello,
I have just disabled Fedora 32 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 32 reached the end of its life on
2021-05-25 (buils for i386 already failed anyway).
This effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible to submit
builds for the following chroots:
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 10:22:55 PM CEST Daniel Farina wrote:
> I am trying to build some extensions to Postgres on COPR. One of the things
> that has made life more complex after EL8 or so is the "module" system. It is
> obligatory to disable the "postgresql" module to be able to install PGDG
>
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:49:22 PM CEST Daniel Farina wrote:
> How about the simplest? Is it not possible to build directly from the
> src.fedoraproject.org repositories, without modification?
$ copr build-distgit --name foo
Note that this method clones package "foo" from the Fedora DistGit
Hi, just a quick update about $Subject, and warning that version Leap 15.1 was
now marked as EOL (build results will be removed after ~6 months if not
prolonged).
Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe
Hello,
I'm glad I can announce that Fedora Copr builders are now on Fedora 34.
There are no known problems at this moment, as all our integration
testing passed.
At the same time we finally deployed a new set of x86_64 hyperviors in
Fedora lab, where we start about 60 builders at this moment
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 5:01:52 AM CEST Рустем Касьянов wrote:
> ср, 28 апр. 2021 г. в 05:18, Рустем Касьянов :
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could you please help me to solve this problem? I run COPR via
> > Docker-compose.
> > Using the latest version from git
> > https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr
On Monday, February 8, 2021 6:23:24 PM CEST Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > python-flask-openid orphan, pjp, sundaram 0 weeks
> > ago
> >
>
> Taken. We still need that for blockerbugs, sigh.
>
> It's dead upstream,
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
