Re: help with failing build

Dne 30.1.2015 v 13:37 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): pyOpenSSL=0.14 Not available on F21 :( That's weird. I have it working with 0.13 but it doesn't work in virtual machine. I'm going to investigate. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: help with failing build

Dne 30.1.2015 v 14:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): That's weird. I have it working with 0.13 but it doesn't work in virtual machine. I'm going to investigate. Ok, uninstalling and installing pyOpenSSL package reintroduced the behavior (SNI not working) However pyOpenSSL form rawhide

Re: help with failing build

-requests python-ndg_httpsclient pyOpenSSL python-pyasn1 See: * http://docs.python-requests.org/en/latest/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors * https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18578439/using-requests-with-tls-doesnt-give-sni-support/18579484#18579484 -- Miro Hrončok

Re: Copr cannot see it's own repo

On 21.3.2016 14:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 19.3.2016 v 11:54 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): See the log here: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/churchyard/horus/fedora-22-i386/00169302-simarrange/root.log.gz https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/churchyard/horus/fedora-22

Please kill my 47 hours old build

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python33/build/439804/ Thanks -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel

Re: Child pid '4787' is dead

On 8.9.2016 13:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 6.9.2016 v 23:22 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): My builds in [python26], IDs 450012 and 450019 end weird on F23, while succeeding on other Fedoras. The last lines of build.log.gz are: + exit 0 Child pid '4787' is dead Child dead, killing

Re: Please kill my 47 hours old build

/python33/build/446340/ On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python33/build/439804/ <https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python33/build/43980

Re: Error 500 : Internal Server Error ('url')

On 13.10.2017 14:36, Michal Novotny wrote: The problem should be fixed now. Please try and let me know. Confirming. clime On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michal Novotny <cl...@redhat.com <mailto:cl...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hey, On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Miro Hr

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

On 14.5.2018 14:20, Michal Novotny wrote: Can we cover it just by providing "with" and "without" fields for chroots/builds which would then basically translate to --with/--without options for mock, rpkg, and similar tools? Yes! Good idea. Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phon

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

2. change the conditional in spec 3. fedpkg srpm 4. copr upload and build 5. script the above or manually do it with every rawhide update What I'd like to do: 1. add fedpkg package with fedmsg+rpkg integration 2. set fedora to 29 via a configuration dialog 3. keep it running automatically -- M

Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

however keep all the branches synced and they use the %{fedora} variable to determine different behavior. I'd like to tell copr: Set fedora to 29 even if building for older Fedoras. Can I do that? Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

gladly buy you a beverage. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Copr overusing python standard library backports on Python 3

/conditional-python-dependencies/ Thank you, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code

Re: Copr overusing python standard library backports on Python 3

On 30.6.2018 15:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KARHO4ZVELJIFBCJG6TEG5ZWUXVVKBSR/ particularly: copr-backend copr-frontend copr-dist-git copr-frontend copr-keygen copr-rpmbuild python-copr use: python3

Re: copr-dist-git Internal Server Error

git_user_content_t:file map; map permission is necessary since f27. Thanks for the quick fix. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr

copr-dist-git Internal Server Error

Hi, I keep getting Internal Server Error every time I want to see copr-dist-git, such as clicking any link at [1] or a commit has next to build details at copr frontend. [1] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Plenty of bogus builds with rpkg s.f.o push automation

t;timestamp": 1523506865, "topic": "org.fedoraproject.prod.copr.build.end", "username": "copr" } https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/churchyard/git/build/740145/ -- You received this message due to your preference settings at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/churchyard.id.fedoraproject.org/email/908 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Re: COPR src.fp.o auto-rebuilds

triggered a build for every one of them. It would make sense in my POV to only trigger once per push. Is there a technical reason for current behavior, or is it intentional? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr

Re: Importing stuck?

On 20. 01. 19 12:56, Michal Novotny wrote: Hello! On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, I've noticed my importing task take a while and the queue looks long already: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/importing/ While there are no pending on running builds

Importing stuck?

Hi, I've noticed my importing task take a while and the queue looks long already: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/importing/ While there are no pending on running builds. Is something broken? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Build is pending but not listed in pending queue

. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Build is pending but not listed in pending queue

On 02. 04. 19 19:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi. My build has been pending for hours: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/876568/ But it is not listed in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/pending/ I've tried to add another build, it is again pending and again

Mock root cache - is there some? can I clean it?

' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/builds/ Maybe I left something undeleted, but it is hard to see what. Thanks for help, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

IOError: Failed to write to /tmp/numpy_test_big_arrays....npy: [Errno 28] No space left on device

I just got this error in Copr. Should I skip big_arrays tests, or is this some quota on /tmp that can be enlarged? Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Re: Mock root cache - is there some? can I clean it?

On 21. 03. 19 7:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: Does copr cache mock roots? Can I clean the cache somehow? New gdb build from Fedora requires Python 3.7, but I had 3.8 in the buildroot. I've deleted my 3.8 builds, so i can rebuild gdb --without python, but apparently Python 3.8 stays in the buildroot

Re: What's wrong with my build? Attempt to build SRPM have failed

On 14. 03. 19 18:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 3/14/19 10:20 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On jeudi 14 mars 2019 18:08:22 CET Miro Hrončok wrote: I don't understand the failure, can you please help me debug it? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/868314/ Thanks

What's wrong with my build? Attempt to build SRPM have failed

I don't understand the failure, can you please help me debug it? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/868314/ Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel

Re: Forked project

/python3.8/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Cond

Rawhide buildroot broken: GPG problem

r/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-30-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-29-primary DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Error: GPG check FAILED -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok __

Automatic rawhide rebuilds vs. src.fp.o Pull Requests

e? Can anyone build anything in my copr via this feature, but for obvious reasons, the builds are not added to the repo? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe s

Re: Automatic rawhide rebuilds vs. src.fp.o Pull Requests

On 28. 05. 19 6:11, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Monday, May 27, 2019 5:42:01 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: It seems that the package is not available in the copr repo. It is not in the main copr repo (directory), but in separate one (dedicated to a concrete PR). Could you help me understand

Is it possible to add extra contributors to a group copr

It seem that individuals can requests permissions in individual coprs, but not in group coprs. Is that correct? I for example don't see the settings tab at @copr/copr (group) but I see it at packit/packit-service-packit-359 (individual). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No usable temporary directory found in ['/tmp', '/var/tmp', '/usr/tmp', '/home/mockbuilder']

I get failures in SRPM builds: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No usable temporary directory found in ['/tmp', '/var/tmp', '/usr/tmp', '/home/mockbuilder'] -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel

Re: Automatic rawhide rebuilds vs. src.fp.o Pull Requests

On 28. 05. 19 6:11, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Monday, May 27, 2019 5:42:01 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: It seems that the package is not available in the copr repo. It is not in the main copr repo (directory), but in separate one (dedicated to a concrete PR). It seems to me that the directories

stderr: /bin/bash: UsernameToken: command not found

/bash: UsernameToken: command not found UsernameToken failed with value 127 Output: [] -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Failed builds for no apparent reasons

Hey, I have coupe dozens (or hundreds?) builds like this: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/936777/ Any idea what went wrong? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr

Re: Failed builds for no apparent reasons

On 18. 06. 19 9:43, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 12:05:58 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: Hey, I have coupe dozens (or hundreds?) builds like this: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/936777/ Any idea what went wrong? Thanks for the report. Long

Re: Failed builds for no apparent reasons

On 18. 06. 19 10:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:07:19 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: On 18. 06. 19 9:43, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 12:05:58 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: Hey, I have coupe dozens (or hundreds?) builds like this: https

copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org down?

3/ I cannot accesss the address either. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: h

API feedback: It's faster to grep HTML

need by parsing HTML is more pleasant than getting it via the API, something is wrong with the API. Not sure if this is severe enough to file a bug report, but please consider this feedback in your future API design decisions. Thank you, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

builder-live.log: Can we get Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8?

: text/plain I wonder whether it can be changed to: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email

Why is copr downloading the sources from the Source URL?

404. Is Copr downloading sources a known thing? I upload SRPMS. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Resubmit via CLI or Python API

build will rebuild the same sources again." -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Cond

Determine root.log vs build.log failures

information Is Copr presenting this kind of information somewhere? (I need to fetch it for hundreds of builds.) I could probably HTTP HEAD the build.log and check Content-Length to guess a root.log failure, but it feels weird... Thanks for tips. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC

I might have just broken copr

I have submitted couple hundreds scm packages + their builds to https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/pytest-4/ Since then, it has been error 504, later 503. Have I broken it? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: I might have just broken copr

On 19. 12. 19 11:21, Miro Hrončok wrote: I have submitted couple hundreds scm packages + their builds to https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/pytest-4/ Since then, it has been error 504, later 503. Have I broken it? It works again. Submitting more packages. -- Miro Hrončok

What does "Rebuild all" do with SCM packages?

Hello. I have noticed the "Rebuild all" button on packages page. Does "Rebuild all" pull from committish with SCM packages, or does it rebuilt the latest SRPM? Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ cop

Re: What does "Rebuild all" do with SCM packages?

On 15. 01. 20 17:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:17:02 AM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. I have noticed the "Rebuild all" button on packages page. Does "Rebuild all" pull from committish with SCM packages, or does it rebuilt the latest SR

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

for this. It indeed feels faster! -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

macros for other distributions, but that is a different topic). Dunno if we need to have an explicit ACK for this. Ideas? Most likely we don't. I was just trying to think ahead. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

e:v-r.fc34.copr1234567 e:v-r.fc34 e:v-r.fc34.copr1234567 > e:v-r.fc34 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

ge listing was significantly optimized, and should now be faster than the web-UI on large projects (issue/757). Thanks, I'll test it instead of my "parse-HTML-by-regex" mad script :) -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ cop

Re: Koji side tag as external repo?

repo is not changing any more, right? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Minor Copr release 2020-06-19

group them into a batch and execute the createrepo_c only once for the whole batch. This saves some resources in general, but the major speedup will be in large projects (where createrepo_c used to block us historically). Thank you so much for this. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release 2020-06-10

. This seems slow, but in bulk, is really awesome. Keep up the good work. I am so glad we have such innovations! -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe

Re: Koji side tag as external repo?

: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-boost/latest/$basearch -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

On 11/13/20 6:32 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, November 13, 2020 6:30:48 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11/13/20 6:24 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: $ copr edit-package-distgit --name ... Indeed, thanks. I needed: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b9d29463b5 Does

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

dist-git packages? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

On 11/13/20 6:24 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, November 13, 2020 6:06:49 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11/13/20 5:25 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Hello! On Nov 13 2020, a new Copr release landed production. The list of user visible changes is in the release notes document: https

Re: 100+ jobs importing, some for 5+ hours

On 11/19/20 9:56 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Thursday, November 19, 2020 9:19:15 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. Is there some copr outage in progress? There are (close to) 0 running or pending builds, but 100+ builds are being imported: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/importing

100+ jobs importing, some for 5+ hours

Hello. Is there some copr outage in progress? There are (close to) 0 running or pending builds, but 100+ builds are being imported: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/importing/ Some of them for many hours. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release

project. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

Building sagemath in copr: SRPM fails with No space left on device

the space be allocated somehow? Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Building sagemath in copr: SRPM fails with No space left on device

On 11/1/20 11:13 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Sunday, November 1, 2020 12:18:55 AM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. I am trying to build sagemath from dist git in Copr. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/parso-0.8/build/1730316/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard

Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

around this particular problem, but you will most likely hit another one later. I wonder whether Copr should disable EPEL 7 aarch64 chroots or at least put a big red sign next to them. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr

Excluding older builds of packages from Fedora when testing new ones in Copr

e (possibly need to exclude all subpackage's NEVRAs from rawhide compose (and Koji buildroot if they differ)) Is there another way? If not, I think (C) is easiest to actually implement, if the chroot settings page in copr gains an "excludes" option. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +

Re: Excluding older builds of packages from Fedora when testing new ones in Copr

sion} helps, but I don't think so. We have an RFEhttps://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/1336 that could help you if you could specify dnf.conf excludepkgs= option for the rawhide repo. But this is not an easy one. Yes, this would work. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok __

Re: Excluding older builds of packages from Fedora when testing new ones in Copr

On 09. 07. 21 11:30, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, July 9, 2021 10:19:57 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 07. 21 9:46, Pavel Raiskup wrote: This is pre-production experiment, right? Couldn't you just specify "Provides: python3dist(click) = 7.9"? It is, but it would n

Order of External Repositories matters?

stalls Python 3.10 with other buildrequires. Does the order of external repos defines their priority/cost? Is that a feature or a bug? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahost

Re: Order of External Repositories matters?

On 11. 02. 21 16:35, Miro Hrončok wrote: I've been surprised by a behavior of External Repositories. I've done two builds of python-six in this copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/tmp/ First with: External Repositories:   copr://@python/python3.10   http

Re: Best practices for mass rebuilds in Copr

/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#mass-rebuilds If you think that some useful tip is missing, let us know. I'd add: If possible, use the --background flag when building large amount of packages. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr

Re: Failing ELN jobs due to broken GPG signatures

leng/issue/10007 this should already be fixed, but the reality begs to differ. Is there anything else I need to do on our side or there's still some underlying unresolved issue? I believe this requires a successful ELN compose to propagate to Copr chroots. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777

Re: Bad exit status from %prep during chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .

On 04. 10. 21 11:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I see this failure in dnf: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/patch251/build/2872812/ Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x8REO2 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf dnf-4.9.0

Bad exit status from %prep during chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .

with Copr builders? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

copr.fedorainfracloud.org down?

It seems that copr.fedorainfracloud.org is down. I don't recall any planned outages. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Re: [EPEL-devel] Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

RHEL-copy (CentOS Linux), could we not continue doing so by using e.g. AlmaLinux? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Re: [EPEL-devel] Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

On 22. 11. 21 15:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote: But EPEL is built against RHEL (not Alma, not Rocky). True. As well as it is true today that it is not built against CentOS Linux (and yet we do that in mock). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: On copr.fedorainfracloud.org, is the filesystem where the package is built local?

On 07. 01. 22 1:40, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Thursday, January 6, 2022 5:20:40 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Copr, just a quick question. When I build a package in Copr (the Fedora one) on x86_64, is the mock chroot located on a local filesystem, or a NFS? Local, it is tmpfs. Thanks

Drop fedora-rawhide-armhfp config?

Fedora 37 no longer has armhfp/armv7hl compose nor Koji repo. Could you please remove the Copr chroot? I've opened https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/867 for mock-core-configs. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

On copr.fedorainfracloud.org, is the filesystem where the package is built local?

Hello Copr, just a quick question. When I build a package in Copr (the Fedora one) on x86_64, is the mock chroot located on a local filesystem, or a NFS? Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list

Re: How to add a another copr repo to my copr builds

. Build options* 3. In *External Repositories:* enter: copr://@kdesig/python-qt6 4. Profit As a side note, the @kdesig/python-qt6 repo needs a Python 3.11 rebuild. on rawhide. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing

Re: Outage: Upgrade of Copr servers - 2022-06-22 12:00 UTC

ich was not implemented https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/1327 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahos

Re: ATTENTION: Copr will be temporarily deleting failed and outdated builds after 7 days

? Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

Re: Outage: Upgrading the Fedora Copr backend storage, 2022-10-28 -- 2022-10-30

W it seems the alert-danger banner at top of https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org added bootstrap css and changed (broke?) the design of the web interface slightly. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailin

Re: RPM Sequoia crypto breaks RPM

On 10. 11. 22 14:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Panu, Copr folks, In https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ksurma/docutils-0.19/build/5030501/ We see: Error: Transaction test error:   package python3-pytest-7.1.3-1.fc38.noarch does not verify: Header RSA signature: BAD (package tag 268

RPM Sequoia crypto breaks RPM

-docutils-0.19-1.fc38.noarch does not verify: Header RSA signature: BAD (package tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature) Those are packages built in the copr. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel

Re: RPM Sequoia crypto breaks RPM

On 10. 11. 22 14:24, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 11/10/22 15:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Panu, Copr folks, In https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ksurma/docutils-0.19/build/5030501/ We see: Error: Transaction test error:    package python3-pytest-7.1.3-1.fc38.noarch does not verify

Re: Can a Copr group be migrated to a different FAS group?

On 07. 03. 23 18:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 03. 23 14:17, Pavel Raiskup wrote: As long as - we can keep the '@python' naming Copr-side, and Yes, that was the plan. - you have no other Copr group defined for the `python-packagers-sig` FAS    group already We don't. it should

Re: Can a Copr group be migrated to a different FAS group?

can test this first on stg.* and do the change. Will try to reach you tomorrow. Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May.  The change was already announced in https

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

sflags=nocontexts Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more information about the arguments. Copr build error: Mock build failed -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ cop

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

On 26. 05. 23 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May.  The change

Re: Excluding older builds of packages from Fedora when testing new ones in Copr

On 09. 07. 21 13:27, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, July 9, 2021 11:36:09 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 07. 21 11:30, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, July 9, 2021 10:19:57 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 07. 21 9:46, Pavel Raiskup wrote: This is pre-production experiment, right

Re: Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

.. or stay with the `mock-core-configs v39.2` a bit longer please. Hi Pavel, this works locally, but not in Copr. Our Python 3.13 Copr builds started failing today with the builddep globbing issue. What do we do? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- __