Hi,
I would also be interested in having a 0.19.2 release, or even more
releases.
If you are starting to run your cluster, you don't know which version you
should take. Some releases were unstable (eg taskstrackers running out of
memory, or executing maps sequentially after a certain number of
I want to feed some mapside join patches in, time to get off my duff and
submit them :)
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
> I am still interested in seeing a 0.19.2 release soon. The 0.19.2-dev and
> 0.18.4-dev branches have been close to dormant for over a month, yet contain
I am still interested in seeing a 0.19.2 release soon. The 0.19.2-dev and
0.18.4-dev branches have been close to dormant for over a month, yet contain
many critical fixes.
With the Yahoo distribution out there, 0.20.1 is a slightly lower priority for
me. Additionally, several other component
On May 27, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
If no one else does, I'll roll 0.18.4, 0.19.2, and 0.20.1 next week.
-- Owen
Owen
wouldn't it be better for the community to learn how to dot
releases when Yahoo does not.
sanjay
On May 28, 2009, at 5:35 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Brian Bockelman wrote:
Hey Scott,
We use 0.19.1 (plus some patches) heavily. The other CMS sites use
the same version -- represents about 600TB of user community :)
presumably this means you have enough of a cluster to do some
testing o
Brian Bockelman wrote:
Hey Scott,
We use 0.19.1 (plus some patches) heavily. The other CMS sites use the
same version -- represents about 600TB of user community :)
presumably this means you have enough of a cluster to do some testing on
an RC?
I'd be interested in seeing a 0.19.2 release
If no one else does, I'll roll 0.18.4, 0.19.2, and 0.20.1 next week.
-- Owen
Hey Scott,
We use 0.19.1 (plus some patches) heavily. The other CMS sites use
the same version -- represents about 600TB of user community :)
I'd be interested in seeing a 0.19.2 released. I was kind of hoping
lasting for a few months more on 0.19.x and then skip to 0.21.x prior
to LHC
Yes, my previous message is really a question as to the status of the 0.19
branch in the community.
If it is essentially dead, I'd like to know ASAP and figure out how to migrate
elsewhere soon. If it has life left, it looks ripe for another cut.
Rolling backwards to 0.18 faces several problems
Scott Carey wrote:
I would like to see a 0.19.2 release soon.
Any committer can build a release candidate and call a release vote.
Are there any committers sympathetic to Scott who would like to
volunteer to drive the 0.19.2 release forward? I think Y! skipped
directly from 0.18 to 0.20, an
10 matches
Mail list logo
