6539727 is no bug

2008-01-09 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, While going through the bug-database I noticed that 6539727 is no bug - the code is just mis-using Deflater. The old deflater implementation did/does not return any bytes when deflateParams() has to be called, at a second call deflate() is called again and further data is processed. The

Early version of striding Deflater

2008-01-09 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hello again, I've finished an early version of the java.util.zip.Deflater implementation that uses striding. Its in an early stage and quite likely will be buggy. It passes FlaterTest and a simple test written by myself, but maybe acts differently in corner-cases. I would be happy to receive some

Re: Performance regression in java.util.zip.Deflater

2008-01-09 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Sorry, sent the wrong files and found some bugs. Will re-send the updated files soon -sorry for the traffic. lg Clemens 2008/1/9, Clemens Eisserer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi again, > > I've finished a very early draft of the native stride+copy > implementation of Deflater. > Its still very early a

Re: Performance regression in java.util.zip.Deflater

2008-01-09 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, I've finished a very early draft of the native stride+copy implementation of Deflater. Its still very early and is not tested a lot (so don't wory about I would think this should go in as is ;) ), but seems to perform quite well. I just post it ... well ... to get some critics and advise