hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6802846: jarsigner needs enhanced cert validation(options)

2009-03-26 Thread weijun . wang
Changeset: b752110df530 Author:weijun Date: 2009-03-27 11:05 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/b752110df530 6802846: jarsigner needs enhanced cert validation(options) Reviewed-by: xuelei ! src/share/classes/sun/security/tools/JarSigner.java ! src/share/classes/s

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6822903: Reliability and documentation improvements for ReentrantReadWriteLock

2009-03-26 Thread martinrb
Changeset: 4a685f3f3ba8 Author:dl Date: 2009-03-26 17:39 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/4a685f3f3ba8 6822903: Reliability and documentation improvements for ReentrantReadWriteLock Summary: Make firstReader a Thread, not a long Reviewed-by: martin ! src/share/

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6801020: Concurrent Semaphore release may cause some require thread not signaled

2009-03-26 Thread martinrb
Changeset: 5303aece2068 Author:dl Date: 2009-03-26 11:59 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/5303aece2068 6801020: Concurrent Semaphore release may cause some require thread not signaled Summary: Introduce PROPAGATE waitStatus Reviewed-by: martin ! src/share/clas

Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES

2009-03-26 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Mar 26, 11:01am, thomas.rodrig...@sun.com (Tom Rodriguez) wrote: -- Subject: Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES | > I would just remove the trancendental c implementation. It is not | > consistent | > with the java one anyway on amd64: | | You've got that backwards. The C implementation is actually

Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES

2009-03-26 Thread Tom Rodriguez
I would just remove the trancendental c implementation. It is not consistent with the java one anyway on amd64: You've got that backwards. The C implementation is actually the correct result as far as the spec goes and it's what is used by StrictMath.log. Math.log is allowed to produce l

Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES

2009-03-26 Thread Volker Simonis
As far as I can see, "old FP" instructions are still emitted for example for the logarithm (see log10D_reg and logD_reg in x86_64.ad, which use fldlg2, fldln2 and fyl2x). These instructions can interact badly with code generated by the native C/C++ compiler. I had such a problem a while ago under

Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES

2009-03-26 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Mar 25, 4:28pm, thomas.rodrig...@sun.com (Tom Rodriguez) wrote: -- Subject: Re: SIGFPE with FPE_FLTRES | That's even more odd to me. x86_64 shouldn't be using the old FP | instructions and the SSE based one don't produce an inexact traps as | far as I can tell. Maybe they are still being