Changeset: 151baf5e19ca
Author:darcy
Date: 2009-10-13 17:34 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/151baf5e19ca
6349921: (enum) Include links from java.lang.Enum to EnumSet and EnumMap
Reviewed-by: martin
! src/share/classes/java/lang/Enum.java
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> I think Objects is a better home for deepEquals(Object, Object) than Arrays
> since the arguments are not arrays and since it is a sibling method to
> equals(Object, Object).
>
While the argument types are Object, the behavior and usage
Hello.
Following up from threads earlier this year,
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2009-February/001061.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2009-March/001191.html
I'm willing and interested to sponsor getting String.join functionality
into JDK 7.
T
Hello.
After recent discussions on the list, the following methods will be
included in round two of the evolution of java.util.Objects:
Under bug 6889858: Add nonNull methods to java.util.Objects:
/**
* Checks that the specified object reference is not {...@code null}. This
* method
Changeset: 8a4543b30586
Author:jjg
Date: 2009-10-13 15:26 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/8a4543b30586
6891079: Compiler allows invalid binary literals 0b and oBL
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/parser/Scanner.java
! src/share/
Changeset: 9d240dbadaa3
Author:darcy
Date: 2009-10-13 14:08 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/9d240dbadaa3
6648344: (reflect spec) State default of isAccessible for reflective objects
Reviewed-by: alanb
! src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessibleObject.java
Changeset: e526e39579ae
Author:jjg
Date: 2009-10-13 14:02 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/e526e39579ae
6887895: CONSTANT_Class_info getBaseName does not handle arrays of primitives
correctly
Reviewed-by: ksrini
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/classfil
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello.
Please review this simple specification clarification (with
accompanying test) for
6648344: (reflect spec) State default of isAccessible for reflective
objects
This looks good to me.
-Alan.
Probably JavaSound is another candidate for closeable refactoring for jdk7?
Specifically all the Line implementations : TargetDataLine,
SourceDataline, Clip.
Joe,
Hi. I've attached a file containing the methods and a JTReg "basic test"
for inclusion in your BasicObjectTests. I adhered to your style, for easy
integration. If you could take it from here, I'd be ever so grateful.
Thanks,
Josh
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Joe,
I don't feel too strongly about this one. Do the right thing.
Josh
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Joshua Bloch wrote:
>
>> I don't think method really pays for itself. If it belongs anywhere, it
>> belongs in java.util.Arrays.
>>
>> Josh
>>
Joshua Bloch wrote:
I don't think method really pays for itself. If it belongs anywhere,
it belongs in java.util.Arrays.
Josh
I think there is room in the platform for this functionality. Even if
this is mostly used in tests, code used in tests is code too :-)
I think Objects i
Rémi Forax wrote:
Le 12/10/2009 19:25, Joseph D. Darcy a écrit :
Joshua Bloch wrote:
Joe,
I'm not sure I like this idea. My one experience with forcing an
array method to do double duty as varargs method was a disaster.
The method was Arrays.asList, and the result was Puzzler # 7 from
"Th
Hi, Martin, Xueming,
I did a benchmark:
unsynchronized 2-ElementCache ./. synchronized 4-ElementCache
Result:
Usage: java -Xint
-Xbootclasspath/p:..\build\classes;..\build\test\classes
java.nio.charset.CharsetBenchmark
As in real world, excessive loops on Charset.forName() are
unlik
Joshua Bloch wrote:
Joe,
Hi. I've attached a file containing the methods and a JTReg "basic
test" for inclusion in your BasicObjectTests. I adhered to your
style, for easy integration. If you could take it from here, I'd be
ever so grateful.
Will do.
Cheers,
-Joe
Thanks,
Jos
Joe,
Thanks very much!
Josh
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Joshua Bloch wrote:
>
>> Joe,
>>
>> Hi. I've attached a file containing the methods and a JTReg "basic test"
>> for inclusion in your BasicObjectTests. I adhered to your style, for easy
>> integrati
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> It's not a good idea to have a hashCode() that allocate objects,
> at least until escape analysis is implemented in all VMs.
Agree with Joe--these methods don't carry their weight. If the allocation is
too much to bear, it's easy enough to w
Le 12/10/2009 19:25, Joseph D. Darcy a écrit :
Joshua Bloch wrote:
Joe,
I'm not sure I like this idea. My one experience with forcing an
array method to do double duty as varargs method was a disaster. The
method was Arrays.asList, and the result was Puzzler # 7 from "The
Continuing Advent
Le 12/10/2009 20:41, Joseph D. Darcy a écrit :
Rémi Forax wrote:
Le 12/10/2009 19:25, Joseph D. Darcy a écrit :
Joshua Bloch wrote:
Joe,
I'm not sure I like this idea. My one experience with forcing an
array method to do double duty as varargs method was a disaster.
The method was Arrays.
Ulf Zibis wrote:
:
In java.nio.file.Filesystem b72 I don't find information about sharing
attributes.
These are provider specific open options so they aren't in the javadoc.
If you look at the dosSharingOptionTests in
jdk/test/java/nio/Path/SBC.java you will see tests for these options.
-Ala
20 matches
Mail list logo
