David,
I think your question is mostly rhetorical. Most of the code in this
class are one-liners. If you can answer it for this method, you have
answered it for all.
I also think it's a common idiom... and so are the other small stuff in here.
Paul
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, David
I put a combined changeset fixing bugs 4421494 and 4396272
as comment #2 and comment #3 to OpenJDK bugzilla report:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
-Dima
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the sponsorship of the bug 4421494.
I can
Paul,
No it is not rhetorical. Most of the one-liners (and I don't necessarily
agree with them either) at least have some perceived convenience value.
In this case I see no value add at all. In fact unless you count on
inlining then this adds pure overhead with the method call.
David
Paul
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:46, David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
david.hol...@sun.com wrote:
Paul,
Paul Benedict said the following on 11/15/09 11:28:
I would like to propose adding this method:
/**
* Selects the object if not {...@code null}; otherwise fallsback to the
* specified
Le 16/11/2009 00:48, Martin Buchholz a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:46, David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
david.hol...@sun.com mailto:david.hol...@sun.com wrote:
Paul,
Paul Benedict said the following on 11/15/09 11:28:
I would like to propose adding this method:
