Changeset: 55952703809f
Author:weijun
Date: 2011-08-19 13:42 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/55952703809f
7043847: NTML impl of SaslServer throws UnsupportedOperationException from
(un)wrap method
7043860: NTML impl of SaslServer doesn't throw ISE from getAuth
Am 18.08.2011 16:11, schrieb Alan Bateman:
Mandy Chung wrote:
Thumbs up from me. Are you going to include this change with
another CR that you have a fix to be pushed?
Mandy
I think it's best to separate this fix and so I've created the
following to track it:
7080622: Remove varargs warn
I will echo Joe's comments about putting the "|" at the end of the line rather
than at the beginning of the next line.
Not a comment on your patch but some of the use of raw RuntimeException is
rather weak. I saw a few cases where IllegalStateException or
UnsupportedOperationException would be
On 8/18/2011 1:14 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
i have created a fix for fixing Exception-Chains in case of an
rethrown RuntimeException.
I am not quite sure if this is inside the scope of what i
discussed[0][1] with Joe. But it is
fixed in the same manner as th
Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
i have created a fix for fixing Exception-Chains in case of an
rethrown RuntimeException.
I am not quite sure if this is inside the scope of what i
discussed[0][1] with Joe. But it is
fixed in the same manner as the patches there.
http://oss-patches.24.eu/op
On 07:01 Thu 18 Aug , Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have created a fix for fixing Exception-Chains in case of an rethrown
> RuntimeException.
>
> I am not quite sure if this is inside the scope of what i
> discussed[0][1] with Joe. But it is
> fixed in the same manner as the patch
Changeset: 759aa847dcaf
Author:alanb
Date: 2011-08-18 16:47 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/759aa847dcaf
7015589: (spec) BufferedWriter.close leaves stream open if close of underlying
Writer fails
Reviewed-by: forax, mduigou
! src/share/classes/java/io/Buffer
On 8/17/11 9:46 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Are you going to include this change with another CR that you have a
fix to be pushed?
Is the CR to small, or what is the reason for your question?
I was just curious which CR this change is going into since it's not
mentioned in your email.
Sorry. Does't Poster it to the list
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Request Review for small change to remove 2 warnings in rmic
Von: Sebastian Sickelmann
An: Alan Bateman
CC:
I updated my Patch so that it handles all varargs warnings in jdk subrepo.
http://oss-patches.24.
Mandy Chung wrote:
Thumbs up from me. Are you going to include this change with another
CR that you have a fix to be pushed?
Mandy
I think it's best to separate this fix and so I've created the following
to track it:
7080622: Remove varargs warnings from rmic
-Alan.
On 08/18/2011 05:04 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
On 08/18/2011 03:23 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
after pulling from both sources
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/
i see that i got two heads.
Is it because in all the other repositorys jdk8/*/
On 08/18/2011 03:23 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
after pulling from both sources
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/
i see that i got two heads.
Is it because in all the other repositorys jdk8/*/jdk there are also
many changes to the jdk-su
12 matches
Mail list logo