hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7092679: (tz) Java getting wrong timezone/DST info on Solaris 11; ...

2011-10-05 Thread masayoshi . okutsu
Changeset: 2bc80ba6f4a4 Author:okutsu Date: 2011-10-05 15:13 +0900 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2bc80ba6f4a4 7092679: (tz) Java getting wrong timezone/DST info on Solaris 11 6984762: Invalid close of file descriptor '-1' in findZoneinfoFile Reviewed-by: coffeys,

Re: JEP 103: Parallel Array Sorting - proposal, reaction to Mr. Harned post

2011-10-05 Thread Kasper Nielsen
On 05-10-2011 05:08, Andrew Thompson wrote: So is there any convergence between these ideas? Should we be thinking about adding a default ForkJoinPool to the platform, or should we be thinking about adding a default ExecutorService to the platform, which may or may not be a ForkJoinPool based

Re: JEP 103: Parallel Array Sorting - proposal, reaction to Mr. Harned post

2011-10-05 Thread Doug Lea
On 10/05/11 03:53, Kasper Nielsen wrote: On 05-10-2011 05:08, Andrew Thompson wrote: So is there any convergence between these ideas? Should we be thinking about adding a default ForkJoinPool to the platform, or should we be thinking about adding a default ExecutorService to the platform,

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Chris Hegarty
Alan, David, I noticed CR 7027061 was closed as 'not a defect'. Should I file a new CR to have the jtreg test fixed (join on all created threads)? The test will still exercise what it is supposed to, and the ConcurrentModificationException issue can be investigated at another time. This way

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Naoto Sato
Hi Chris, I appreciate it, and will fix the test case. Naoto On 10/5/11 7:07 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: Alan, David, I noticed CR 7027061 was closed as 'not a defect'. Should I file a new CR to have the jtreg test fixed (join on all created threads)? The test will still exercise what it is

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Chris Hegarty
Alan, Naoto, David I filed CR 7098100: java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java fails intermittently. If you're ok with it please review the patch (below) and I can push it to the tl repo. Job done! : hg diff test/java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java diff -r 24741fe639a8

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Naoto Sato
Looks good to me. Thanks! Naoto On 10/5/11 8:42 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: Alan, Naoto, David I filed CR 7098100: java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java fails intermittently. If you're ok with it please review the patch (below) and I can push it to the tl repo. Job done! : hg diff

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Alan Bateman
Chris Hegarty wrote: Alan, Naoto, David I filed CR 7098100: java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java fails intermittently. If you're ok with it please review the patch (below) and I can push it to the tl repo. Job done! I assume there is also some underlying issue in the Locale code and this might

Re: i18n dev testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread Naoto Sato
I will look into this. Reopened the original CR. Naoto On 10/5/11 9:58 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: Chris Hegarty wrote: Alan, Naoto, David I filed CR 7098100: java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java fails intermittently. If you're ok with it please review the patch (below) and I can push it to the tl

Re: testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread David Holmes
On 6/10/2011 2:58 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: Chris Hegarty wrote: Alan, Naoto, David I filed CR 7098100: java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java fails intermittently. If you're ok with it please review the patch (below) and I can push it to the tl repo. Job done! I assume there is also some underlying

Re: i18n dev testcase failure java/util/Locale/Bug6989440.java

2011-10-05 Thread David Holmes
This might not be related to the CME problem, but here: public static LocaleServiceProviderPool getPool(Class? extends LocaleServiceProvider providerClass) { LocaleServiceProviderPool pool = poolOfPools.get(providerClass); if (pool == null) {