Hi Sean,
The the patch has been committed @
Changeset: e06ea0dd9207
Author:littlee
Date: 2012-04-10 10:17 +0800
URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e06ea0dd9207
7121314: Behavior mismatch between AbstractCollection.toArray(T[] ) and its spec
Reviewed-by: dholmes, mduigou
Con
Changeset: 1ffe2565ec06
Author:weijun
Date: 2012-04-10 12:15 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/1ffe2565ec06
7158329: NPE in sun.security.krb5.Credentials.acquireDefaultCreds()
Reviewed-by: valeriep, jjg
! src/share/classes/sun/security/krb5/Credentials.java
+ te
Changeset: e06ea0dd9207
Author:littlee
Date: 2012-04-10 10:17 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e06ea0dd9207
7121314: Behavior mismatch between AbstractCollection.toArray(T[] ) and its spec
Reviewed-by: dholmes, mduigou
Contributed-by: Sean Zhou , Ulf Zibis
, Da
Changeset: 9c429f38ca7e
Author:ksrini
Date: 2012-04-09 14:31 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/9c429f38ca7e
7156633: (javac) incorrect errors when parsing variable declaration in block
statements.
Reviewed-by: jjg
Contributed-by: [email protected]
! s
The "Contributed-by:" information has to be email addresses:
http://openjdk.java.net/guide/producingChangeset.html
HTH,
-Joe
On 04/08/2012 06:57 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to push the changeset to the gate, but no matter how I
change the Contributed-by list, I always ge
On 09/04/2012 08:53, Sean Chou wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to suggest to replace the static error string in
ZIP_Put_In_Cache0 with on stack memory.
:
The modification is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/OJDK-482/webrev.00/ .
Good catch, this one had probably been there for
On 04/09/2012 05:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/04/2012 08:01, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
There are 2 sun bugs related to this issue:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6695325^and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=66354
On 09/04/2012 08:01, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
There are 2 sun bugs related to this issue:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6695325^and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=661089
Hi all,
I would like to suggest to replace the static error string in
ZIP_Put_In_Cache0 with on stack memory. Because it takes more time to
modify a string than an int typed error number, it opens a window larger
than int typed error number and might bring in race in multi-thread user
cases.
Hi core-libs-devs,
There are 2 sun bugs related to this issue:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6695325^and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6610897^
The basic problem is that the new con
10 matches
Mail list logo