Changeset: 9d1738ef61d6
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9d1738ef61d6
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset 8d2ed9d58453
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9881db0a65bf
Author:prr
Date: 2012-06-26 09:38 -0700
URL: http://hg.o
Changeset: bf27b857c6ee
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/bf27b857c6ee
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset 300f45e99064
! .hgtags
Changeset: 404521944ac9
Author:lana
Date: 2012-07-10 11:40 -0700
URL: http://hg
Changeset: c7e62fc9df92
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/c7e62fc9df92
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset 4ca599497172
! .hgtags
Changeset: 01d9911df25d
Author:erikj
Date: 2012-06-28 14:59 -0700
URL: htt
Changeset: 0c7bb1f4f9c8
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/hotspot/rev/0c7bb1f4f9c8
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset cf37a594c38d
! .hgtags
Changeset: fa0c28fabbb1
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-12 16:48 -0700
URL: ht
Changeset: fe6a060afc40
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxws/rev/fe6a060afc40
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset ae368a83c240
! .hgtags
Changeset: efb564de8a8e
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-12 16:48 -0700
URL: http
Changeset: f6a685069274
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:43 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/rev/f6a685069274
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset 27fa766a2298
! .hgtags
Changeset: c8d320b48626
Author:erikj
Date: 2012-07-03 16:11 -0700
URL: http://hg.ope
Changeset: cb31b67326bc
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-07-05 18:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/cb31b67326bc
Added tag jdk8-b46 for changeset 30141e598d72
! .hgtags
Changeset: 21e46ea21c6a
Author:lana
Date: 2012-07-10 11:40 -0700
URL: http://h
Changeset: 2a39c98c1241
Author:weijun
Date: 2012-07-17 11:57 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2a39c98c1241
7102106: TEST_BUG: sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh should be modified
Reviewed-by: mullan
! test/sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh
Changeset: e2d265c9b592
Author:weijun
Date: 2012-07-17 11:28 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e2d265c9b592
7183203: ShortRSAKeynnn.sh tests intermittent failure
Reviewed-by: xuelei
! test/sun/security/mscapi/ShortRSAKey1024.sh
- test/sun/security/mscapi/ShortRS
Changeset: 1469be7182b4
Author:khazra
Date: 2012-07-16 16:30 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/1469be7182b4
7177045: Rework the TestProviderLeak.java regression test, it is too fragile to
low memory errors.
Summary: Increase Xmx to 20 MB and add mechanisms to ea
Hi Alan. The reason we didn't go this route is that we want to be able
to create the RMI Registry on a random port which is not one of the
reserved ports (see TestLibrary.FIXED_PORT_MIN/MAX). To do this, we use
'new ServerSocket(0)', which creates a socket on a random port, then
close the por
Here's webrev.05
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmocek/7142596/webrev.05). Changes:
- Simplify createRegistryOnUnusedPort()
- Simplify getUnusedRandomPort()
- Add isReservedPort() method to determine if a port is a reserved port
# (not just one of the FIXED_PORT's, but also any port which should
Changeset: 0562a97bd601
Author:vinnie
Date: 2012-07-16 22:41 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/rev/0562a97bd601
6880559: Enable PKCS11 64-bit windows builds
Reviewed-by: valeriep
! THIRD_PARTY_README
Changeset: 5cee646eaaa7
Author:vinnie
Date: 2012-07-16 22:38 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5cee646eaaa7
6880559: Enable PKCS11 64-bit windows builds
Reviewed-by: valeriep
! THIRD_PARTY_README
! make/sun/security/Makefile
! test/sun/security/pkcs11/PKCS11Test
I just tried running these tests with -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack set
to true, but they still fail. I remember working on some of these
failures in networking where ipv6 multicast was buggy,
but absolutely nothing made those tests work.
However, in this case, if we make sure that the address th
Hi Alan,
I gave the "continue ->else if " a try, it appears the server vm
obviously likes
the "continue" approach (it is consistent with what we experienced in
the past
when we did similar approach for ascii, in which we separate/singled the
ascii
path out). So I guess we probably want to kee
Am 16.07.2012 18:59, schrieb Xueming Shen:
Yes, it might be desirable to share some of the mappings, especially among
those variants. But as
I suggested at the very beginning of the project, the priority for now is to
move all the charsets to
the new mapping based/build-time generated implemen
On 7/16/2012 9:57 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Sherman,
as I just said for 7183053, I can't look in the details at the moment,
as I do not have suitable environment installed at the moment.
All I can see, looks reasonable.
Regarding part 4 of bug 6653797, there is still existing adaptor from
my
Hi Sherman,
as I just said for 7183053, I can't look in the details at the moment, as I do not have suitable
environment installed at the moment.
All I can see, looks reasonable.
Regarding part 4 of bug 6653797, there is still existing adaptor from my side,
if desired.
Just one comment: I thi
On 7/16/2012 9:30 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Sherman,
as I just said for 7183053, I can't look in the details at the moment,
as I do not have suitable environment installed at the moment.
Just one comment: I think it should be possible to share the mapping
data partly across charsets, so the
After looking at it again, technically, we ought to remove the fixed
ports from the list of ports available to the RMI Registry (OK, so this
isn't a BIG deal). Using SocketFactory's as Alan suggests will solve
this problem as well.
Darryl
On 07/16/2012 08:42 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi Darry
Hi Darryl,
Sorry, I'm going to have to ask you to update this again. The issues are in
TestLibrary.java and are all related to catching exceptions and throwing new
exception instances, discarding the original exception (and probably relevant
diagnostic information) in the process.
Let's get
On 15/07/2012 19:54, Kurchi Subhra Hazra wrote:
Hi,
Some tests in our test repository assume that
InetAddress.getLocalHost() will return 127.0.0.1. However, with
linux systems running Ubuntu 12.04 now returning 127.0.1.1 as
localhost, these tests are failing. I have changed two
of the NIO t
23 matches
Mail list logo
