Hi again,
I have found an inconsistency in the last patch I posted. Specifically
the Method.getAnnotation(Class) and Constructor.getAnnotation(Class) did
not delegate to the root instance as .getAnnotations() did. I corrected
that in new revision of the patch:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1017774
It is on my list. to update the javadocs I need a ccc which I have not done
yet and is needed as part of this change
On Nov 23, 2012, at 3:07 AM, Deven You wrote:
> Hi Lance,
>
> Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance
I just realized that I also use String.trim() a lot, and have always
assumed it's very cheap; that's no longer the case.
JDK itself contains many usages of trim(); even a lot of
str.substring().trim()
Just saying.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Zhong Yu wrote:
> Changing String.substring
On 23/11/2012 11:40, Alexey Utkin wrote:
I mean:
# jdk_io
-# 7162111 - these tests need to be updated to run headless
-java/io/Serializable/resolveClass/deserializeButton/run.sh macosx-all
-java/io/Serializable/serialver/classpath/run.sh macosx-all
-java/io/Serializable/ser
On 22/11/2012 21:27, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
Looking for a review for the webrev below, which also resolves:
7175692: (process) Process.exec should use posix_spawn [macosx]
For additional context and a brief description it would be well worth
looking at the following thread started by Mi
On 23.11.2012 15:24, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 23/11/2012 11:22, Alexey Utkin wrote:
On 23.11.2012 14:58, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 23/11/2012 10:40, Alexey Utkin wrote:
The sub-task JDK-8003898 (X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default
toolkit) was resolved.
New version that takes it into account
On 23/11/2012 11:22, Alexey Utkin wrote:
On 23.11.2012 14:58, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 23/11/2012 10:40, Alexey Utkin wrote:
The sub-task JDK-8003898 (X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default
toolkit) was resolved.
New version that takes it into account (changes in TraceJFrame.java):
http://cr.o
On 23.11.2012 14:58, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 23/11/2012 10:40, Alexey Utkin wrote:
The sub-task JDK-8003898 (X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default
toolkit) was resolved.
New version that takes it into account (changes in TraceJFrame.java):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-7
On 22/11/2012 16:36, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
Looking to backport these changes to the test makefiles to jdk7. As
per Alans original mail:
"This one is a small clean-up of the test targets defined in
jdk/test/Makefile. The union of the tests executed by each of the make
targets should b
Hi David, Alan, Alexander and others,
Here's a refinement of a patch I proposed in this thread a couple of
weeks ago:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/101777488/jdk8-hacks/JEP-149/webrev.02/index.html
The changed sources can be browsed here:
https://github.com/plevart/jdk8-hacks/tree/annotation-array
On 23/11/2012 10:40, Alexey Utkin wrote:
The sub-task JDK-8003898 (X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default
toolkit) was resolved.
New version that takes it into account (changes in TraceJFrame.java):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-7162111/webrev.03/
This looks good to me.
The sub-task JDK-8003898 (X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default
toolkit) was resolved.
New version that takes it into account (changes in TraceJFrame.java):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-7162111/webrev.03/
On 22.11.2012 13:57, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/11/2012 07:38
On 23/11/2012 09:09, alexey.ut...@oracle.com wrote:
Changeset: ee6e5b7d5d55
Author:uta
Date: 2012-11-23 13:07 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ee6e5b7d5d55
8003898: X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default toolkit
Summary: XToolkit is not selected for any valu
Changeset: ee6e5b7d5d55
Author:uta
Date: 2012-11-23 13:07 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ee6e5b7d5d55
8003898: X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default toolkit
Summary: XToolkit is not selected for any values of system-wide environment
variables (ex. DISPLAY)
Hi Lance,
Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
Thanks a lot!
On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Hi Deven,
I will address the needed updates a bit later.
Thank you for your input
Best
Lance
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan
15 matches
Mail list logo
