Probably because the API-Spec
(http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/StringBuilder.html#toString%28%29)
says ..A new String object is allocated and initialized to contain
the character sequence currently represented by this object...
Regards,
Volker
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:47 AM,
On 02/28/2013 09:07 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Probably because the API-Spec
(http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/StringBuilder.html#toString%28%29)
says ..A new String object is allocated and initialized to contain
the character sequence currently represented by this object...
Hi,
Please review the fix.
Bug description:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7190897
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-7190897
The suggested fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-7190897/webrev.00/
Summary:
The isolated method for the file security
Changeset: 7d272e524768
Author:chegar
Date: 2013-02-28 12:39 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7d272e524768
8006409: ThreadLocalRandom should dropping padding fields from its serialized
form
Reviewed-by: dl, martin, alanb, shade
!
Yes, makes sense to avoid the branching in that method.
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 02/28/2013 09:07 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Probably because the API-Spec
(http://docs.oracle.com/**javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/**
Changeset: 133a0a0c2cbc
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2013-02-28 14:00 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/133a0a0c2cbc
8008723: Graph Inference: bad graph calculation leads to assertion error
Summary: Dependencies are not propagated correctly through merged
On 28.02.2013 18:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 28/02/2013 11:54, Alexey Utkin wrote:
:
The suggested fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uta/openjdk-webrevs/JDK-7190897/webrev.00/
Thanks for sorting this out, this code should have used AccessCheck in
the original implementation. A couple of
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.comwrote:
The update to make/java/zip/Makefile looks good to me, we should have
done it a long time ago. I assume you are pushing ahead on this because you
want to push it to jdk7u-dev (as it's not interesting to jdk8 now
Here's the latest version of the proposed patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk8/JNIEXPORT/
that has been tested, but only with gcc 4.6,
but is also written to work with llvm.
This looks fine, however since 4.2.1 is still used for some builds we need to
filter that
Here's the latest version of the proposed patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk8/JNIEXPORT/
that has been tested, but only with gcc 4.6,
but is also written to work with llvm.
This looks fine, however since 4.2.1
I meant 4.1.2…
-DrD-
On 2/28/13 11:57 AM, David DeHaven wrote:
Has a bug been filed for this? -DrD-
As mentioned earlier in this thread...
Dan
On 2/19/13 5:21 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
I couldn't find a 'jdk' repo relevant bug for this issue so I filed:
8008509: 6588413 changed JNIEXPORT visibility
Hello,
This concerns the issue
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7032154.
The patch described in the issue has been updated to be with respect to the
current JDK repository tip. The updated version is attached to this message.
This is a large patch so it would be great to
I forgot that the attachment is not redistributed and that I can now post on
cr.openjdk.java.net so here's the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/7032154/
Begin forwarded message:
This concerns the issue
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7032154.
The patch described
13 matches
Mail list logo
