On 06/14/2013 01:27 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Jun 13 2013, at 14:56 , Remi Forax wrote:
On 06/13/2013 04:47 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
There is a difference between an Iterator/forEach and a spliterator/stream,
with a stream you
On Jun 13, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 06/13/2013 04:47 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
There is a difference between an Iterator/forEach and a
spliterator/stream,
with a stream you know that the called
On 06/14/2013 11:20 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 06/13/2013 04:47 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
There is a difference between an Iterator/forEach and a spliterator/stream,
On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
The following does not throw CME:
ListInteger l = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
for (Integer i : l) {
l.remove(1); // 2 is never encountered
}
Where as the
Hi,
This patch implements optimizations for the limit/substream operations when
input to those operations have certain properties (corresponding to known size
or unordered) which helps to avoid out of memory issues (not all, we still have
some more work to do).
The {Xxx}/Stream.generate
On 06/14/2013 12:55 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
The following does not throw CME:
ListInteger l = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
for (Integer i : l) {
l.remove(1); // 2 is never
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
It would be a shame for overriding forEach/forEachRemaining
implementations to conform to such behaviour when they can implement
stronger/consistent failure guarantees.
While I could agree with you in theory, in practice I
On 2013-06-14, at 8:41 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
In the codes I was referring to, there was always a way to know that the
remove was done at the end by example by knowing that the last element was a
special sentinel or by using a counter.
So is the following program bugged ?
Changeset: 659828443145
Author:coffeys
Date: 2013-06-14 15:14 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/659828443145
8015978: Incorrect transformation of XPath expression string(-0)
Reviewed-by: darcy, joehw
Contributed-by: aleksej.efi...@oracle.com
!
Changeset: 45a3584bfacf
Author:coffeys
Date: 2013-06-14 15:14 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/45a3584bfacf
8015978: Incorrect transformation of XPath expression string(-0)
Reviewed-by: darcy, joehw
Contributed-by: aleksej.efi...@oracle.com
+
There are 623 occurrences, and hence 623 deprecated build warnings, of
PlatformLogger.isLoggable(int) in the jdk source.
PlatformLogger is an internal API, and used in may places in the jdk.
isLoggable(int) has been deprecated in favor of isLoggable(Level).
isLoggable(Level) is slightly more
Changeset: 6b48ebae2569
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-06-14 16:25 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/6b48ebae2569
8016569: javac, add new flag for polymorphic method signatures
Reviewed-by: jjg
Contributed-by: maurizio.cimadam...@oracle.com
!
Changeset: f695f447f6b7
Author:jzavgren
Date: 2013-06-14 09:13 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/f695f447f6b7
8014307: Memory leak ... security/jgss/wrapper/GSSLibStub.c
Summary: I modified the native procedure:
Looks fine Chris; thanks,
-Joe
On 6/14/2013 8:00 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
There are 623 occurrences, and hence 623 deprecated build warnings, of
PlatformLogger.isLoggable(int) in the jdk source.
PlatformLogger is an internal API, and used in may places in the jdk.
isLoggable(int) has been
Changeset: 1936a884b290
Author:vromero
Date: 2013-06-14 18:01 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/1936a884b290
8008023: Get rid of utf8 chars in two tests
Reviewed-by: jjg
! test/tools/javac/api/6437999/Utf8.java
! test/tools/javac/api/T6306137.java
Any chance the static method Comparator.reverseOrder() will be renamed to
something like reversedNaturalOrder? Now all of the calls to
Comparator.reverseOrder() take on new meaning.
Jason
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:04:38 -0700
From: henry@oracle.com
To: lambda-...@openjdk.java.net;
On Jun 13 2013, at 06:21 , Remi Forax wrote:
On 06/13/2013 07:28 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
I have updated my webrev with Remi's improvements and some other
improvements to the fast-fail concurrent modification checking.
Revised webrev:
On Jun 14 2013, at 05:41 , Remi Forax wrote:
On 06/14/2013 12:55 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
The following does not throw CME:
ListInteger l = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
for (Integer i : l) {
I have updated the webrev again. In addition to moving the modification checks
to be consistently after the operation for the most complete fast-fail
behaviour I've also slightly enhanced the Map default to detect ISE thrown by
setValue as a CME condition.
Hi,
This is to elimnate the overrides warning from ClassDeclaration.java.
This class is used by rmi, but sun/tools/java and
sun/tools/javac also heavily uses it, let me know if anyone else should
also be reviewing it.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8016698 [To appear]
Webrev:
On 06/14/2013 09:45 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Jun 14 2013, at 05:41 , Remi Forax wrote:
On 06/14/2013 12:55 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
The following does not throw CME:
ListInteger l = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(1,
Hi Martin;
Thanks, as always, for the feedback!
Louis Wasserman's question about existing methods delegating to newer methods
and discussions regarding the serialization impacts with Stuart Marks lead me
to reconsider the approach used in revision 3.
For revision 4 I've replaced most of
On 06/14/2013 11:57 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
I have updated the webrev again. In addition to moving the modification checks to be
consistently after the operation for the most complete fast-fail behaviour
I've also slightly enhanced the Map default to detect ISE thrown by setValue as a CME
Hi folks,
As per the bug:
JAXP must be buildable using JDK7 as the bootdir. Unfortunately
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/659828443145 calls a method
that only exists in 8. (Double.isFinite())
This element of the changeset needs to be reverted.
Looks fine Rob; approved.
-Joe
On 6/14/2013 5:28 PM, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
As per the bug:
JAXP must be buildable using JDK7 as the bootdir. Unfortunately
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/659828443145 calls a
method that only exists in 8. (Double.isFinite())
This
Approved.
Brad
On 6/14/2013 5:31 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Looks fine Rob; approved.
-Joe
On 6/14/2013 5:28 PM, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
As per the bug:
JAXP must be buildable using JDK7 as the bootdir. Unfortunately
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/659828443145 calls a
method
26 matches
Mail list logo
