Hi,
I propose a patch for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040892
Here's the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/Collectors.duplicateKey/webrev.02/
There has already been a discussion on the lambda-dev about this bug:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:48 AM, Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhal...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hello,
Issue:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026236
Patch:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8026236/webrev.00/
This test provides a rudimentary verification of isProbablePrime() by:
Hi Peter,
IMHO such security manager usage by the test is v. fragile and we should try
and find a safer alternative if possible.
However, there may also be an issue with lambda form code. (About a month ago i
too was looking, internally, at this kind of issue and thought there was a
Hi Brian,
There seems to be a confusion between upperBound and the 1st n
primer numbers. You pass upperBound as the parameter n of the
parsePrimes() method which returns 1st n primes from the file (it can
return less primes if the file is smaller).
I suggest doing the following:
- make
Hi,
* Yasumasa Suenaga yasue...@gmail.com [2014-04-04 10:56]:
I've succeeded to make binaries which are contained debuginfo as following:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-March/012037.html
$ make images STRIP_POLICY=no_strip POST_STRIP_CMD=
I guess that we should run
On 09/04/2014 15:51, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi,
Please help review the fix for JDK-8039751.
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039751
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8039751/webrev/
This is the corner case (in 4 bytes sequence) we missed when fixing
diff -r 57c1da89ae1a src/share/classes/java/util/prefs/Base64.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/util/prefs/Base64.java Wed Apr 16 12:32:36
2014 -0700
+++ b/src/share/classes/java/util/prefs/Base64.java Mon Apr 21 20:20:57
2014 -0300
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
int numFullGroups = aLen/3;
I would to add for news methods on Iterable, I believe it will helpful for
many Java Developers.
diff -r 3dd165facde7 test/java/util/Iterator/IteratorDefaults.java
--- a/test/java/util/Iterator/IteratorDefaults.java Wed Apr 09 12:26:00
2014 -0700
+++
Hello everyone, one question.
Conditions that always returns true, is 'if' necessary?
I found one.
diff -r 57c1da89ae1a
src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/BoundMethodHandle.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/BoundMethodHandle.java Wed Apr 16
12:32:36 2014 -0700
+++
Didn’t we just discuss this like a week ago?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-April/026506.html
On Apr 17, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
otaviopolianasant...@gmail.com wrote:
I would to add for news methods on Iterable, I believe it will helpful
Yes I did a mistake, please ignore.
I sent twice but it had one week as delay.
Sorry
On Apr 23, 2014 2:01 PM, Brian Goetz brian.go...@oracle.com wrote:
Didn’t we just discuss this like a week ago?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-April/026506.html
On Apr 17, 2014,
Just a few comments:
1. When you write a test that uses the jtreg /policy option, the policy
file overrides the system policy file. If the test depends on a standard
extension, then you may get SecurityExceptions unless additional perms
are granted. Thus, there are quite a few tests that
On 4/23/2014 1:10 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Just a few comments:
1. When you write a test that uses the jtreg /policy option, the
policy file overrides the system policy file. If the test depends on a
standard extension, then you may get SecurityExceptions unless
additional perms are granted.
On Mar 13 2014, at 08:56 , Jason Mehrens jason_mehr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Mike,
The constructor modification looks good. The only other alternative I can
think would be to use 'c.toArray(EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA)' to avoid creating an
extra array. I'm guessing that version would not perform
On Mar 13 2014, at 09:53 , Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
It's time to add general purpose public static final empty arrays to
Arrays.java for Object, all the primitive types, and perhaps also String,
instead of local copies scattered around the JDK; then have ArrayList use
Hello all;
Revisiting this issue again at long last I have updated the proposed changeset
based upon Jason Mehren's most recent feedback.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8035584/4/webrev/
This version reverts the prior changes to toArray().
Mike
At long last I got back to this issue and discovered that there are some
lurking issues with property reinitialization. I've created a couple of bugs
for some of the shortcomings I discovered. None of these are caused by this
changeset. I would like to hold off completing this issue until we
17 matches
Mail list logo
