RFR(XS): 8075658: Mark intermittently failuring core-svc tests

2015-07-17 Thread Yekaterina Kantserova
Hi, Could I please have a review of this fix. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075658 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8075658/webrev.00 Thanks, Katja

Re: RFR(XS): 8075658: Mark intermittently failuring core-svc tests

2015-07-17 Thread olivier.lagn...@oracle.com
Hi Katja, Looks ok to me too. It has been a relatively manual process and I'm not aware of a mechanism how to sync test-key-bug. What I can do is to mark bugs I went through with for example 'key-intermittent' label to distinguish them form the new ones. That's another additional label,

Re: RFR(XS): 8075658: Mark intermittently failuring core-svc tests

2015-07-17 Thread Yekaterina Kantserova
Jaroslav, Thank you for the review! It has been a relatively manual process and I'm not aware of a mechanism how to sync test-key-bug. What I can do is to mark bugs I went through with for example 'key-intermittent' label to distinguish them form the new ones. Are there other suggestions?

Re: RFR JDK-8130914: java/util/zip/TestExtraTime.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: setTime should make getLastModifiedTime return the specified instant: 3078282244456 got: 3078282244455

2015-07-17 Thread Peter Levart
Hi Sherman, On 07/15/2015 09:10 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, Please help review the change for JDK-8130914. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130914 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8130914/ This is a regression triggered by

Re: RFR JDK-8130914: java/util/zip/TestExtraTime.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: setTime should make getLastModifiedTime return the specified instant: 3078282244456 got: 3078282244455

2015-07-17 Thread Xueming Shen
On 7/17/15 8:45 AM, Xueming Shen wrote: On 7/17/15 1:04 AM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi Sherman, On 07/15/2015 09:10 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, Please help review the change for JDK-8130914. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130914 webrev:

Re: RFR JDK-8130914: java/util/zip/TestExtraTime.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: setTime should make getLastModifiedTime return the specified instant: 3078282244456 got: 3078282244455

2015-07-17 Thread Xueming Shen
On 7/17/15 1:04 AM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi Sherman, On 07/15/2015 09:10 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: Hi, Please help review the change for JDK-8130914. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130914 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8130914/ This is a regression triggered by

Re: RFR(XS): 8075658: Mark intermittently failuring core-svc tests

2015-07-17 Thread joe darcy
Hello, Yes, my general guidance is to make sure flaky tests are marked as intermittent in the test itself. This lets someone running the test easily check if the test is known to be unreliable *in that state of the sources*. There is a upfront overhead to collecting information about the

Re: StackOverflowError on HashMap.hashCode() due to self reference

2015-07-17 Thread Vitaly Davidovich
IMHO, this doesn't warrant any special wording -- if someone hits this, I think it's fairly evident what the issue is. You can get the same problem with adding an ArrayList to itself and calling hashCode(). On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Krystal Mok rednaxel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone,

StackOverflowError on HashMap.hashCode() due to self reference

2015-07-17 Thread Krystal Mok
Hi Vitaly, I can buy that argument. It wasn't hard for me to recognize it when I saw it in real world. But apparently whoever asked me about it couldn't wrap his head around it to understand why... Maybe it's a case for a Pitfalls book instead of for JavaDocs. Thanks, Kris On Friday, July 17,

RFR (M/L): 8131168: Refactor ProcessHandleImpl_*.c and add implememtation for AIX

2015-07-17 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi, I worked on refactoring the native ProcessHandleImpl implementation to enable more code sharing and make it easier to add support for new platforms (e.g. AIX) and I think I had a pretty nice version running. But unfortunately I've just realized that the recent changes to ProcessHandleImpl

StackOverflowError on HashMap.hashCode() due to self reference

2015-07-17 Thread Krystal Mok
Hi everyone, I'm sure somebody has seen this stack overflow before. My question is: is it expected (which should be documented to warn people not to do this), or is it considered a bug (which should be fixed)? Example: https://gist.github.com/rednaxelafx/930f8979473185cfc0a0 import java.util.*;

Re: StackOverflowError on HashMap.hashCode() due to self reference

2015-07-17 Thread Krystal Mok
Hi Louis, hanks! I thought I had seen it somewhere but I couldn't recall where. That's exactly what I need to answer the guys who asked me for a doc reference. Thanks, Kris On Friday, July 17, 2015, Louis Wasserman lowas...@google.com wrote: The Javadoc of Map already specifies: Note:

RFR v2 - 8027634: Support @argfiles for java command-line tool

2015-07-17 Thread Henry Jen
Thanks Mandy and Magnus for looking into the patch, and feedbacks from Kumar Srinivasan and Michel Trudeau. We have an updated version to be reviewed at, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8027634/v2/webrev/ This version changes the syntax a little bit as following, but pretty much