Hi Volker,
Looks fine.
Is there any way to test this?
It seems like it needs a special file system state that would not be
readily available.
Thanks, Roger
On 8/10/15 9:57 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can somebody please review this trivial fix?
Thanks,
Volker
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Roger Riggs roger.ri...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Volker,
1) ProcessHandle.java:243
For the definition of the new commandLine method I would:
- Use @link instead of @code for references to commands() and arguments()
for easy navigation
- @implNote[1] should
Hi,
can somebody please review this trivial fix?
Thanks,
Volker
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
can somebody please review the following small fix contributed by
matthias.baes...@sap.com:
Hi folks,
We have a hang between LdapClient / Ctx due to the fact that
Connection.cleanup() calls LdapClient.processConnectionClosure which
locks the unsolicited vector and in turn calls LdapCtx.fireUnsolicited
which locks the eventSupport object. Unfortunately when an
LdapCtx.close() occurs
Hello Henry,
Build changes look good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-07-10 05:48, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
Please review proposed patch for JDK-8027634[1]. This patch is to enable java
support command line argument file like javac does. The implementation use the
same syntax rule, which is implemented in
New build changes look fine to me.
/Erik
On 2015-08-08 09:03, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
Another update for argument file support, this version we added a couple
measures to ensure compatibility,
1) Compile time directive ENABLE_ARG_FILES is needed to enable the feature,
only java is enabled
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133188
Just a next portion of tt tags removed.
specdiff report:
Hi Alexander,
I've been hoping that someone does cleanups of the jdk as you are doing now.
Some of these source files are part of jsr166 and are maintained
separately, in jsr166 CVS.
http://g.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/
And that has already been tt/code-cleaned (although it has been done
