Hello,
yes, an ExecutorService or Executor or ForkJoinPool depending on the
minimum requirements you have.
As a default you can eithter use
ForJoinPool.commonPool() or Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor() or a
DirectExecutor() if you dont want to handle the null case special.
BTW: little nit, I w
Am 08/09/16 um 19:04 schrieb e...@zusammenkunft.net:
> So it is a good idea to find a good shared default, but an API quite
> seldomly can isolate itself and the users about those aspects. So always
> allow to provide an alternate Executor. This also helps with thread
> naming, thread context, inte
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> On 08/13/2016 01:55 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>> On Aug 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Kim Barrett
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> full:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/jdk.04/
>>>
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarre
Hi Mandy,
On 08/13/2016 01:55 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Aug 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/jdk.04/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/hotspot.04/
This looks very good.
Have you considered having JVM_WaitForReference
